Some members of the anti-war movement would say "nothing more", and they would put forward thefollowing arguments to support that position. The first is that any force with the power to intervene willhave interests which extend beyond the liberation of the oppressed. It will use the intervention to furtherthose interests. This was demonstrably the case in Haiti last month, where the US used the restoration oforder as a pretext for deposing a disobedient leader. As Noam Chomsky says, "One choice, always, is tofollow the Hippocratic principle: 'First, do no harm.' If you can think of no way to adhere to that elementaryprinciple, then do nothing." [3] As it is impossible to send in an army and do no harm, or to exercise powerin another nation without affecting the balance of power elsewhere, this surely means that it is always betterto do nothing.