Another reason, some say, could be the violence against women that has been reported, documented, ‘fashionised’ and in general captured the imagination of the social media generation and media in general. “A film like Queen, which I enjoyed very much, may not have had the response that it had if it were “pre-Nirbhaya” and the discourse it sparked,” says actress Tilottama Shome. Much of the change has been led by the women themselves as it has been in real life. “The burden of ensuring business has been the hero’s preserve so far. Now heroines are willing to take the risk,” says Richa. So the Bollywood trade that has hitherto been run like a feudal, patriarchal set-up may now be willing to be more accommodative and gender-equitable, provided it sees the money. The heroines, says filmmaker Shoojit Sarcar, have been overshadowing heroes in terms of their choice of work. “Top-of-the-line actresses are proudly backing unusual projects, doing things on their own terms. They don’t want to just dance around the trees,” he says. The sheer range of roles and narratives of women-centric films is far superior and more progressive. Tilottama, however, feels that though the Bollywood woman has progressed from pious goddess to the sexy, sexy mujhe log bole, to the assertive kissing heroine, in truth, these are just mild variations of each other. “The intolerable change has been in the hypersexualisation of the female body to make profit. But thankfully there are a few directors who are exploring narratives that are gender-sensitive and make place for women of different sizes,” she says. Things are changing, she feels, even if at glacial speed, thanks to the few independent filmmakers and producers who have taken the risk at personal cost. She has done some unusual roles like playing the stony Aruna Ahemadi in Dibakar Banerjee’s Shanghai or Kanwar the man-woman in Anup Singh’s Qissa.