The Night After

It is now fashionable to talkabout "the day after". Let's talk about the night after.

After the end of hostilities in Iraq, the world will be faced with two decisive facts:

First, the immense superiority of American arms can beat any people in the world,valiant as it may be.

Second, the small group that initiated this war--an alliance of Christianfundamentalists and Jewish neo-conservatives--has won big, and from now on it will control Washington almostwithout limits.

The combination of these two facts constitutes a danger to the world, and especiallyto the Middle East, the Arab peoples and the future of Israel. Because this alliance is the enemy of peacefulsolutions, the enemy of the Arab governments, the enemy of the Palestinian people and especially the enemy ofthe Israeli peace camp.

It does not dream only about an American empire, in the style of the Roman one, butalso of an Israeli mini-empire, under the control of the extreme right and the settlers. It wants to changethe regimes in all Arab countries. It will cause permanent chaos in the region, the consequences of which itis impossible to foresee.

Its mental world consists of a mixture of ideological fervor and crass materialinterests, an exaggerated American patriotism and right-wing Zionism.

That is a dangerous mixture. There is in it something of the spirit of Ariel Sharon, aman who has always had grandiose plans for changing the region, consisting of a mixture of creativeimagination, unbridled chauvinism and a primitive faith in brute force.

Who are the winners?

They are the so-called neo-cons, or neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all ofwhose members are Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well as in thethink-tanks that play an important role in formulating American policy and the ed-op pages of the influentialnewspapers.

For many years, this was a marginal group that fostered a right-wing agenda in allfields. They fought against abortion, homosexuality, pornography and drugs. When Binyamin Netanyahu assumedpower in Israel, they offered him advise on how to fight the Arabs.

Their big moment arrived with the collapse of the Twin Towers. The American public andpoliticians were in a state of shock, completely disoriented, unable to understand a world that had changedovernight. The neo-cons were the only group with a ready explanation and a solution. Only nine days after theoutrage, William Kristol (the son of the group's founder, Irving Kristol) published an Open Letter toPresident Bush, asserting that it was not enough to annihilate the network of Osama bin Laden, but that it wasalso imperative to "remove Saddam Hussein from power" and to "retaliate" against Syria andIran for supporting Hizbullah.

Following is a short list of the main characters. (If it bores you, skip to the nextsection).

The Open Letter was published in the Weekly Standard, founded by Kristol with themoney of ultra-right press mogul Rupert Murdoch, who donated $ 10 million to the cause. It was signed by 41leading neo-cons, including Norman Podhoretz, a Jewish former leftist who has become an extreme right-wingicon, editor of the prestigious Encounter magazine, and his wife, Midge Decter, also a writer, Frank Gaffneyof the Center for Security Studies, Robert Kagan, also of the Weekly Standard, Charles Krauthammer of theWashington Post, and, of course, Richard Perle.

Perle is a central character in this play. Until recently he was the chairman of theDefense Policy Board of the DefenseDepartment, which also includes Eliot Cohen and Devon Cross. Perle is a director of the Jerusalem Post, nowowned by extreme right-wing Zionists. In the past he was an aide to Senator Henry Jackson, who led the fightagainst the Soviet Union on behalf of the Jews who wanted to leave. He is a leading member of the influentialright-wing American Enterprise Institute. Lately he was obliged to resign from his Defense Departmentposition, when it became known that a private corporation had promised to pay him almost a million dollars forhe benefit of his influence in the administration.

That Open Letter was, in effect, the beginning of the Iraq war. It was eagerlyreceived by the Bush administration, with members of the group already firmly established in some of itsleading positions. Paul Wolfowitz, the father of the war, is No. 2 in the Defense Department, where anotherfriend of Perle's, Douglas Feith, heads the Pentagon Planning Board. John Bolton is State DepartmentUndersecretary. Eliot Abrams, responsible for the Middle East in the National Security Council, was connectedwith the Iran-Contra-Israel scandal. The main hero of the scandal, Oliver North, sits in the Jewish Institutefor National Security Affairs, together with Michael Ledeen, another hero of the scandal. Headvocates totalwar not only against Iraq, but also against Israel's other enemies, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and thePalestinian Authority. Dov Zakheim is comptroller for the Defense Department.

Most of these people , together with Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, areassociated with the "Project for the New American Century", which published a White Paper in 2002,with the aim 'to preserve and enhance this 'American peace'"--meaning American control of the world.

Meyrav Wurmser (Meyrav is a chic new Israeli first name) is Director of the Center forMiddle East Policy at the Hudson Institute. She also writes for the Jerusalem Post and is co-founder of theMiddle East Media Research Institute that is, according to the London Guardian, connected with Israeli ArmyIntelligence. MEMRI feeds the media and politicians with highly selective quotations from extreme Arabpublications. Meyrav's husband, Davis Wurmser, is at Perle's American Enterprise Institute, heading MiddleEast Studies. Mention should also be made of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy of our oldacquaintance, Dennis Ross, who for years was in charge of the "peace process" in the Middle East.

In all the important papers there are people close to the group, such as WilliamSafire, a man hypnotized by Sharon, in the New York Times and Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post.Another Perle friend, Robert Bartley, is the editor of the Wall Street Journal.

If the speeches of Bush and Cheney often sound as if they came from the lips ofSharon, one of the reasons may be that their speechwriters, Joseph Shattan, Mathew Scully and John McConnell,are neo-cons, as is Cheneys Chief-of-Staff, Lewis Libby.

The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close alliance withthe extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who nowadays control Bush's Republican party. The foundingfathers were Jerry Falwell of the Moral Majority, who once got a jet plane as a present from Menachem Begin,and Pat Robertson of the Christian Coalition and the Christian Broadcasting Network, which help to finance theChristian Embassy in Jerusalem of J.W. van der Hoeven, an outfit that supports the settlers and theirright-wing allies.

Common to both groups is their adherence to the fanatical ideology of the extremeright in Israel. They see the Iraq war as a struggle between the Children of Light (America and Israel) andthe Children of Darkness (the Arabs and Muslims).

By the way, none of these facts are secret. They have been published lately in dozensof articles, both in American and world media. The members of the group are proud of them.

The Zionist general.

The man who symbolizes this victory is General Jay Garner, who has just been appointedchief of the civilian administration in Iraq.

He is no anonymous general who has been picked accidentally. Garner is the ideologicalpartner of Paul Wolfowitz and the neo-cons.

Two years ago he signed, together with 26 other officers, a petition organized by theJewish Institute for National Security Affairs, lauding the Israeli Army for "remarkable restraint in theface of lethal violence orchestrated by the leadership of the Palestinian Authority," which is certainlynews to the Israeli peace forces. He also stated that "a strong Israel is an asset that American militaryplanners and political leaders can rely on."

In the first Gulf War he praised the performance of the Patriot missiles, which hadfailed miserably. After leaving the army in 1997, he became, not surprisingly, a defense contractorspecializing in missiles. It was alleged that he landed non-competitive Pentagon contracts. This year heobtained a defense contract for $ 1.5 billion, as well as a contract for building Patriot systems in Israel.

Therefore, there can be no better candidate for the job of chief of the civilianadministration in Iraq, especially at a time when contracts for billions of dollars for reconstruction have tobe handed out, to be paid for by Iraqi oil.

A new Balfour declaration.

The ideology of this group, that calls for an American world-empire as well as for aGreater Israel, reminds one of bygone days.

The Balfour declaration of 1917, that promised the Jews a homeland in Palestine, hadtwo parents. The mother was Christian Zionism (among whose adherents were illustrious statesmen like LordPalmerston and Lord Shaftesbury, long before the foundation of the Zionist movement), the father was Britishimperialism. The Zionist idea allowed the British to crowd out their French competitors and take possession ofPalestine, which was needed to safeguard the Suez Canal and the shorter sea route to India.

Now the same thing is happening again. Last year Richard Perle organized a briefing inwhich a speaker proposed war not only on Iraq, but on Saudi Arabia and Egypt as well, in order to secure theworld's oil heartland. Iraq, he asserted, was only the pivot. One of the justifications for this design is theneed to defend Israel.

To bet on our life?

Seemingly, all this is good for Israel. America controls the world, we controlAmerica. Never before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of world power.

But this tendency troubles me. We are like a gambler, who bets all his money and hisfuture on one horse. A good horse, a horse with no current competitor, but still one horse.

The neo-cons will cause a long period of chaos in the Arab and Muslim world. The Iraqiwar has already shown that their understanding of Arab realities is shaky. Their political assumptions did notstand the test, only brute force saved their undertaking.

Some day the Americans will go home, but we shall remain here. We have to live withthe Arab peoples. Chaos in the Arab world endangers our future.

Wolfowitz and Co. may dream about a democratic, liberal, Zionist and America-lovingMiddle East, but the result of their adventures may well turn out to be a fanatical and fundamentalist regionthat will threaten our very existence.

The partnership of the neo-cons and the Christian fundamentalists may engendercounter-forces in Washington. And if Bush is defeated in the next election, like his father after his victoryin the first Gulf War, this whole gang will be thrown out.

The Bible tells us about the kings of Judea, who relied on the then world power,Egypt. They did not appreciate the rise of forces in the east, Assyria and Babylon. An Assyrian general toldthe king of Judea: "Behold, thou trustest upon the staff of this bruised reed, upon Egypt, on which if aman lean, it will go into his hand and pierce it." (II kings 18, 21).

Bush and his gang of neo-cons is not a bruised reed. Far from it, he is now a verystrong reed. But should we bet our whole future on this?

Uri Avnery is an Israeli journalist. His essays are included in TheOther Israel: Voices of Refusal and Dissent.