October 28, 2020
Home  »  Website  »  International  » Opinion  »  The Indelible Yet Besieged Legacy Of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
Opinion

The Indelible Yet Besieged Legacy Of Ruth Bader Ginsberg

Ruth Bader Ginsberg's appointment as a Supreme Court Justice was met with a great deal of suspicion from feminist activists, who feared that she would not be the most passionate advocate for women’s rights. But, proved them wrong.

Google + Linkedin Whatsapp
Follow Outlook India On News
The Indelible Yet Besieged Legacy Of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
Justice Ginsberg’s death has caused a political storm in the USA.
AP
The Indelible Yet Besieged Legacy Of Ruth Bader Ginsberg
outlookindia.com
2020-09-22T16:50:56+05:30

The presidential tenure of Bill Clinton can best be described as tumult. The jury is out regarding many of his decisions, except one—the nomination of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the USA Supreme Court in 1993. Both supporters as well as detractors of Justice Ginsburg, do converge on the fact that her tenure was one of the most eventful ones in the Supreme Court in the past fifty years. Justice Ginsburg passed away on September 18, 2020, after spending close to three glorious decades in the USA top court.

Justice Ginsburg was the second female to ever adorn the benches of the USA Supreme Court, the first being Justice Sandra O’Connor. Later dubbed as the “Notorious RBG”, she was a pioneer of the women’s liberation movement in the USA and a significant portion of her life’s work was dedicated towards ushering in gender just laws. Ginsburg was inspired by the civil rights movement and saw the feminist activism as its extension and logical successor.

Growing up in the inherently unequal America of the 1940s-1960s with its institutionalised and mainstream sexism, Ginsburg was quickly confronted with the unjustness of the system. Despite having served on the Harvard Law Review (considered a symbol of intellectual brilliance) and graduating top of her class at Columbia, no law firm in New York City wished to hire a woman at the time. Similarly, she lost a chance of serving as a Law Clerk to Justice Felix Frankurter of the USA Supreme Court, who unabashedly told her the he wasn’t ready to hire women.  

Confronted by this harsh reality, Ginsburg turned to activism. From 1972, she began a close relationship with the American Civil Liberties Union, and co-founded its Women’s Rights Project. Within two years she had taken part in more than 300 gender-related cases. One of her most iconic wins at the Supreme Court was Frontiero v Richardson (1973), which decided that compensation and other service benefits cannot be given differently on the basis of gender alone. The case particularly challenged the service rules of the US Air Force which prohibited ‘husbands’ of female officers from being listed as dependents for the purposes of housing and other dependence. This was based on the assumption that men are the family breadwinners and women are the caretakers. Of the total six cases argued in the Supreme Court by Justice Ginsburg, she won an astonishing five, setting the foundation for a revolution in gender justice oriented jurisprudence which has subsequently been emulated across the world.

In her attempts to persuade an all-male Supreme Court, Ginsburg focused on male applicants. This strategic litigation allowed her to confront the Justices with the harmful effects of gender discrimination on men such as themselves. Winning their empathy in this manner, she managed to shake the foundations of the sexist system in the advantage of both men and women.

Ginsburg also landed several teaching positions and became the first female tenure lecturer at Columbia University. Subsequently, she functioned as a surprisingly moderate federal judge. Her appointment as a Supreme Court Justice was therefore met with a great deal of suspicion from feminist activists, who feared that she would not be the most passionate advocate for women’s rights. 

Justice Ginsburg proved them wrong. Her years at the Supreme Court were characterized by her staunch belief in gender equality and her support for LGBTQIA+ and minority rights. She was the author of the majority opinion in United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996), wherein the Court struck down as discriminatory the practise of male-only admissions in the Virginia Military Academy. This judgment revolutionized the US Constitution’s ‘equal protection of laws’ clause (14th Amendment) by adding equality on the basis of gender to the traditional interpretation of equality on the basis of race. Referring to the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Education Board of Topeka, Ginsberg stated that if racially segregated schools were declared unconstitutional, then separate military academies for women should also be declared unconstitutional, for they would not impart the same level of military training as the male ones. Justice Ginsburg’s verdict in the Virginia Military case in particular served to be a great inspiration behind the Indian army permitting the commissioning of women.

Faced with a conservative-leaning Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg often had to turn to dissenting opinions as well. She famously disagreed with the majority’s view in Bush v. Gore that the manual vote recount for the presidential election ordered by the Florida Supreme Court was unconstitutional. In Shelby County v. Holder, the majority held the federal preclearance for changes in the voting laws of states with a history of racial discrimination to be unconstitutional. Justice Ginsburg vehemently protested, stating that this preclearance effectively protected against racial voting discrimination and that the judgment resembled “throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.” Some of her other influential dissents dealt with issues such as gender workplace discrimination and reproductive health.

Justice Ginsberg’s death has caused a political storm in the USA. President Trump plans to fill her seat as soon as possible by replacing her with a female, loyal and conservative candidate. This would present the conservatives with a ‘super majority’ in the Supreme Court. Democrats met this news with a wave of protest and called to postpone any nomination until after the presidential election in November. Such a super majority would put the right to abortion, amongst others, on a shaky pedestal. A part of Ginsberg’s legacy in the fight for gender equality could therefore be at serious risk of being erased. This is a troublesome testimony that the fight against discrimination in the USA has not been won yet, but is on the contrary facing a threat of regression. Regardless, it goes without doubt that Justice Ginsberg’s was one of the most influential figures in the fight for women’s rights and liberal thought in the USA. Her highly respected, brilliant mind will be missed in these times of growing insecurity.

 

 

Hannah Aziza Ghulam is a LL.M candidate at the University of Cambridge and was formerly a Student Research Assistant to Professor Dr. Y. Haeck at Ghent University, Belgium.

Aditya Manubarwala is a LL.M candidate at the University of Cambridge and has previously served as Special Advisor on International Law and Public Policy to the President of Afghanistan. He is also the incumbent Global Peace Ambassador to India.    

 

(Views expressed are personal.)

 

For in-depth, objective and more importantly balanced journalism, Click here to subscribe to Outlook Magazine
Next Story >>
Google + Linkedin Whatsapp

The Latest Issue

Outlook Videos