Making A Difference

'Interested In Lowering Tensions'

Is this the formal position, as articulated by the Pakistan foreign minister: 'You're talking of terrorism sponsored by Pakistan across LOC, but I would rather that you also spoke of state terrorism committed by Indian military occupation forces in K

Advertisement

'Interested In Lowering Tensions'
info_icon

Text of the joint press conference by the American secretary of state and the foreign minister ofPakistan, on Jan 29

Colin Powell: We reviewed the situation in Afghanistan. We reviewed ourbilateral relationship, which we believe is strong and will continue to grow in the months and years ahead. Wediscussed the situation on the entire subcontinent. We talked about relations between India and Pakistan, andI once again reaffirmed to the Foreign Minister that the United States wishes to play a helpful role in thearea and will be doing everything we can to continue to reduce tensions in the region, and hopefully reach apoint where dialogue can begin between India and Pakistan and all of the various issues that exist between thetwo nations, to include, of course, Kashmir.

Advertisement

We also had a discussion on topical issues such as Iraq, Iran and similar matters. And I might point outthat the Minister gave me a very full description of Pakistanis concerns on a new NSEERS program, theregistration program. We know that this program has caused some concern among Pakistani Americans as well asPakistanis back home who are watching how it is being implemented.

I assured the Minister that we are very sensitive to those concerns. He gave me a number of ideas as to howsome of these concerns can be dealt with. He will be meeting with the Attorney General later this afternoon toalso discuss this matter. But I also reinforced that this is not something directed at Pakistan or directed atMuslims or directed at Pakistanis in America; it is an effort on the part of the United States to do a betterjob of knowing who is in our country.

Advertisement

We appreciate all the contributions that Pakistanis have made to American life, and so many Pakistanis havebecome American citizens. So we will continue to learn from our experience with the program, and I wanted tolinger on this point so that the Minister has my full assurance that we will be doing everything to implementthis program in a dignified manner.

Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri: Thank you.

Colin Powell: Mr. Minister.

Khurshid Mehmud Kasuri: Yes, I'd like to first read a very brief statement and then I amquite -- I am available for answers.

I have had extremely cordial and productive discussions with your Secretary of State, Mr. Colin Powell. Ourtalks today encompassed the entire range of our bilateral relationship. We also exchanged views ondevelopments in our region, including relations with India and Pakistan, particularly the Kashmir issue, thelatest developments in Afghanistan, the situation obtaining in Iraq.

Both of us reaffirmed our mutual commitment to strengthen and broaden the Pakistan-U.S. relationship indiverse fields and to lend it a permanent character. The U.S. Secretary of State has assured me of the firmU.S. commitment to the well-being and prosperity of Pakistan.

Both sides expressed profound satisfaction on our strong cooperation in the global fight against terrorism.I reaffirmed Pakistan's abiding commitment to the Secretary of State in this regard and assured him that ourcommitment is long-lasting.

I apprised the Secretary of State of the state of our relations with India and the need for initiation of abilateral dialogue process between Pakistan and India to resolve all outstanding issues, including the coreissue of Jemo and Kashmir. The Secretary of State assured me that the United States will remain engaged inSouth Asia and would work towards the beginning of a Pak-India bilateral dialogue process.

Advertisement

In the context of Afghanistan, we expressed our commitment to the Bonn process which is aimed at bringingabout peace and stability in Afghanistan. We also reaffirmed the need for an all around commitment in orderthat the process of Afghanistan's reconstruction gets underway.

On Iraq, we had an exchange of views, particularly in the context of our membership with the United NationsSecurity Council. We hope for a peaceful outcome, including Iraq's full compliance with the Security Councilresolutions.

I also raised with the Secretary of State an issue of very immediate, shall I say primary concern forPakistan, and that is -- and that has agitated our public opinion immensely. This relates to the registrationof foreign nations in the United States under the NCS program. I have urged the Secretary of State thatPakistan should be excluded from this list and that Pakistani nationals in the United States should beprovided the necessary relief and flexibility under the law.

Advertisement

On this last issue, I just want, Mr. Secretary, your permission to say one or two things because I know alot of Pakistani journalists are also here and they are very educated and they want to hear something from me.I have brought out to the Secretary of State all the ramifications of this particular law. Now, we havediscussed various things, but what I have suggested to him is that even under the law, because the Secretarysaid it will ultimately apply to the whole world, it's not aimed at Pakistanis, but what we are afraid of ismass deportation of Pakistanis under any provision or pretext whatsoever. That will be devastating and it willplace undue pressures on our relationship. The Secretary, I am grateful, appreciates that and he has promisedto play, let's say a supportive role, and I am grateful to him for that.

Advertisement

Thank you very much.

Question: Mr. Secretary, if we could please revert back to Iraq. There's talk on the Hillnow again about maybe exile for Saddam Hussein as possibly the only way left to avoid a confrontation. Iwonder if you could again address that.

And so far as the evidence you're going to present, not all of it I understand has been seen by theinspectors. Is it a different category of material or something?

Colin Powell: Well, with respect to exile, if he were to leave the country and take someof his family members with him and others in the leading elite who have been responsible for so much troubleduring the course of his regime, we would, I am sure, try to help find a place for them to go. And so thatcertainly would be one way to avoid war, and we have indicated this before.

Advertisement

With respect to my presentation next week, I expect to put forward information and evidence which will fillin some of the gaps with respect to what Dr. Blix and Dr. El Baradei discussed earlier this week about theproblems they have had getting Saddam Hussein to participate in the disarmament, to lead the disarmamenteffort, which he is required to do under [UN Security Council Resolution] 1441.

The information I present, some of it will be an expansion of information that has already been seen, someof it is information that has been given to inspectors, and some of it will be new information that werereally not relevant to the inspectors' work but relevant to making the case with respect to the Husseinregime's possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Advertisement

Elaine Monaghan.

Question: Well, actually -- (laughter).

Colin Powell: Very well.

Question: I actually wanted to ask you about the evidence, in fact, I'm afraid. I'm alittle confused because one of the suggestions seems to be that it's satellite photographs that -- satellitephotographs, which don't seem to be a particular problem in terms of intelligence because they were taken bysatellites. So is there going to be more evidence that may involve you having to consider revealing sources,that kind of thing?

Colin Powell: You can be sure that we will be as forthcoming as we can next week, but alsomindful of sources and methods. And it will be, I think, a rather comprehensive presentation, but we'll allsee it together next Wednesday.

Advertisement

Question: A Pakistani journalist wants to ask a Question.

Colin Powell: Of course.

Question: You have been in touch with Pakistani and Indian leaders on a resumption ofdialogue between the two countries. What are the prospects now?

Colin Powell: Well, I think we have to find a way to get the dialogue begun. Somesuggestions have been made that perhaps some economic moves from one side to the other might be a way tojumpstart it. I think many people are watching activity that is occurring across the line of control to seewhether the rate of that activity, if it went down, might be an encouraging step.

Advertisement

So we're looking for different ways to use our good offices to get a dialogue moving, but at the moment Idon't know that I can be more forthcoming in that. We'll continue to work hard at it. And what I said to bothPakistani and Indian leaders is that the United States is committed to doing everything we can to get thedialogue going.

There were some people who were concerned that, you know, once the demobilization took place and thingscalmed down a bit, the United States would not be interested any longer. We are interested. We remaincommitted. We remain committed to a strong U.S.-Pakistan relationship and a strong U.S.-Indian relationship.It's not a zero sum game. We can have good friendships with both nations. And by having good friendships withboth nations, we can lend our good offices to solving difficulties between --

Advertisement

Khurshid Mehmud Kasuri: In this connection, I explained to the Secretary of State theefforts made by the Government of Pakistan, by myself, by Prime Minister Jamali, to invite Prime MinisterVajpayee to Pakistan for the SAARC conference. Unfortunately, for reasons best known to the leaders andGovernment of India, that invitation was not accepted, and that would have appreciably actually led to alowering of tensions in the region.

Colin Powell: Thank you. Terri.

Question: I know you don't put much stock in what the Iraqis say, but the Iraqi UNAmbassador was just at the stakeout up at the UN, and he said that in 1998 the Clinton Administrationconfirmed that all Iraqi weapons of mass destruction had been destroyed by the attacks in 1998, and he askedwhether now -- this is putting one President in the position of contradicting another. What is yourunderstanding of what the situation was in 1998 and --

Advertisement

Colin Powell: That's a verbal trick on his part. I think what he's referring to is afterOperation Desert Fox, a great deal of damage was inflicted, I am quite sure, on the targets that the ClintonAdministration and the military at that time went after. But I don't think anybody would claim that thosestrikes, in and of themselves, pulled up the entire infrastructure. And, in fact, I think the Questions thatexisted at that time, put forward by UNSCOM -- what happened to these stocks -- those Questions remainrelevant today and that's what we'll be looking at.

Question: Mr. Secretary, you said that if Saddam Hussein and his retinue decided to leaveor were willing to leave, the United States might try to find somewhere where he could go. Would the UnitedStates also, under those circumstances, consider offering any kind of immunity for Saddam Hussein and thosepeople?

Advertisement

Colin Powell: I am not prepared to talk to that. I think it's not for the United Statesalone to offer that kind of protection. I mean, it would have to be a broader forum that might look at such a Question.But I think that's so hypothetical right now that it would be interesting to chat about, but not terriblyrelevant at the moment.

Question: Mr. Secretary, Mr. Minister, any comments on the diplomatic dogfight betweenIndia and Pakistan? And it has been going for many, many years and some people are -- both nations are blamingeach other. And also on terrorism from Pakistan into India, both nations are blaming each other. And also,sir, as far as this diplomatic fights are going on, or dogfights, some people in India are saying that now whyshould India and Pakistan have diplomatic relations at all.

Advertisement

Khurshid Mehmud Kasuri: Well, thank you for the Question because it does provide me anopportunity to put another light on that. You're talking of terrorism sponsored by Pakistan across LOC, but Iwould rather that you also spoke of state terrorism committed by Indian military occupation forces in Kashmir.

Having said that, and since I do not believe in heightening rhetoric, I have not responded in kind to somevery inflammatory statements from Ministers in the Government of India because I'm interested in loweringtensions. I have already stated the Government of Pakistan, the Foreign Minister -- myself, the Prime MinisterJamali, we are very keen to resume a process that ultimately leads to a solution of all outstanding issues,including the core issue of Jemo and Kashmir.

Advertisement

Colin Powell: Thank you.

Tags

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement