National

Kangana Violated Sanction Plan At Khar Residence, Says Court; Rejects Actress’ Plea

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) had in March 2018 issued a notice to Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut for ‘unauthorized constructions’ at her Khar flats.

Advertisement

Kangana Violated Sanction Plan At Khar Residence, Says Court; Rejects Actress’ Plea
info_icon

Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut violated the sanctioned construction plan while merging her three flats, a civil court in Mumbai remarked while rejecting her plea seeking to restrain the Mumbai civic body from demolishing the unauthorized construction.

A court in suburban Dindoshi dismissed an application filed by Kangana last week. The detailed order became available on Thursday.

Judge L S Chavan noted in the order that Kangana, who owns three flats on the fifth floor of a 16-storey building in Khar area of the city, merged them into one.

In doing so, she covered the sunk area, duct area, common passage and converted free the Floor Space Index (FSI) into a habitable area, the judge observed.

Advertisement

"These are grave violations of the sanctioned plan for which the permission of the competent authority is required," the court said.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) had in March 2018 issued a notice to the actor for "unauthorized constructions" at her Khar flats.

Another notice asked her to restore the structure to its original position as per the original plan, warning that if the order was not followed, then the unauthorized portion will be demolished.

Kangana challenged the demolition notice and also requested the court to restrain the civic body from carrying out demolition. The court had then ordered status-quo.

Advertisement

In the latest order on December 23 judge Chavan rejected the actor's application, saying the "interference of this court is not required".

However, the court has given her six weeks to approach the Bombay High Court against the order.

On September 9, the BMC had demolished parts of Kangana’s bungalow in the Pali Hill area for alleged "unauthorized" construction. She moved the HC against it.

The high court later termed the BMC's action as illegal and malicious.

Tags

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement