National

Class 11 Student Who Allegedly Murdered Ryan Student Pradyuman To Be Tried As Adult

The Juvenile Justice Board, Gurugram transferred the case to District And Sessions Court. The hearing for which will begin from December 22.

Advertisement

Class 11 Student Who Allegedly Murdered Ryan Student Pradyuman To Be Tried As Adult
info_icon

A class 11th student arrested for the murder of a seven-year-old boy Pradyuman Thakur in the premises of Ryan International School, Gurugram, will be tried as an adult.

The Juvenile Justice Board, Gurugram transferred the case to District And Sessions Court. The hearing  for which will begin from December 22.

The board passed the order this morning responding to a plea that the teenager accused of the crime should not be treated as a juvenile.

At its last hearing on December 15, the board had reserved its decision till December 20 on whether the accused could be tried as an adult.

Advertisement

The teenager is expected to be produced before Gurgaon's Sessions Court at its next hearing on December 22.

The board had earlier rejected the bail plea of the Class 11 Ryan International School student, accused of killing Pradhuman Thakur, a Class 2 student of the same school, in the school premises on September 8.

It had set up a committee which included a psychologist from PGI Rohtak for an expert opinion on the accused, who had been taken into custody by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) last month.

The Juvenile Justice (Care For Protection Of Children) Act 2015 allows the board to transfer cases, of minors accused of henious offenses, to the Sessions court. Under Section 15, special provisions have been made to tackle child offenders committing heinous offences in the age group of 16-18 years. The Juvenile Justice Board is given the option to transfer cases of heinous offences by such children to a Children’s Court (Court of Session) after conducting preliminary assessment. 

Advertisement

The panel submitted its report in two sealed envelopes, which were opened in the court on the day of the last hearing.

Lawyer Sushil Tekriwal, representing Pradhuman's father, said the report was based on behavioural, sociological and psychological aspects of the teenager.

According to Tekriwal, the report said the accused should be treated as an adult and it suggested that he was "hyper- aggressive".

The CBI counsel had also pressed for the teenager to be treated as an adult.

The Juvenile Justice Board had noted that the accused was mature enough to recognise the consequences of his actions.

Pradhuman was found with his throat slit in the school's washroom. The Gurgaon police had said the crime was committed by the school bus conductor, which the CBI later refuted.

The CBI claimed the teenager had killed Pradyuman in a bid to get the school closed so that a scheduled parent- teachers meeting and an examination could be deferred.

(Inputs from PTI)

Advertisement