The Madras High Court today dismissed a petition by a former police Officer seeking a stay in trial of the Sankararaman murder case, in which Kanchi Seer Jayendra Saraswathi and his junior Vijendra Saraswathi are main accused
S P Sakthivel, who was also Chief Investigating Officer in the case
submitted that the prosecution had never sought his assistance after his
retirement on March 31 2006. He also noted that many witnesses were
treated as hostile.
He contended that unless trial in Puducherry was stayed, his efforts to
nab the accused would go in vain and the truth would never come come
He said action should have been taken against approver Ravi Subramaniam
under Section 308 of CrPc (Trial of person not complying with conditions
of pardon) for turning hostile and on basis of his confessional
statement under Sec164 of Cr.P.C. "That apart, the Government should have
proceeded against him for giving false evidence," he said.
Sakthivel sought a direction to the Home Secretary,ADGP of CB-CID to
take appropriate steps against the approver and to re-examine hostile
witnesses and mark their confessional statements before examining him
as a witness in his capacity as Investigation officer.
When the matter came up before Justice P Jyothimani,Public Pleader P
Kumaresan said necessary steps were taken at the right time against the
approver and that this court could not exercise jurisdiction in the
sessions court trial as it would amount to interfering with
administration of justice.
Dismissing the petition, Justice P.Jyothimani said once investigation is
completed and trial is in progress, the scope of the court here to
interfere is limited. The parties in question would be entitled to
question the validity of the judgement only after it is delivered, he
Since the petitioner is the Investigation officer,he should be entitled
to get a copy of documents and must be permitted to peruse the same
before he is asked to give evidence.
Earlier a local court in Puducherry adjourned to April 5, hearing in the
case following a request by Sakthivel, seeking time to peruse documents
relating to the case.
Only eight of the 24 accused were present in court and the absentees included the two Seers.
The trial was shifted from Chengalpattu court in Tamil Nadu to
Puducherry following a Supreme Court order in 2005 on a petition by
Sankararaman, manager of Varadaraja Perumal temple in Kancheepuram, was
allegedly murdered in the premises of the temple on September 3, 2004.
Sankararaman Murder Case: HC Declines to Stay Trial
THE LATEST ISSUE
- Indra Gupta, The Sarkari Doctor Aspiring To Keep Jaipur In The Pink Of Health
- Stay Wherever You Are To Stop Coronavirus From Spreading: PM's Message To Country
- 'Don't Panic,' Sonia Gandhi Tells People, Suggests PM Annouce Sector-Wise Relief Package
- The Viral Learning Curve: Universities And Classes In The Time Of Corona
- Coronavirus: Cases In India Rise To 283; Amid Fear, Country To Observe 'Janata Curfew' Tomorrow
- Dipak Misra Was Reviled As CJI But Ranjan Gogoi Beguiled His Way To Power
- Taking Up Hijab Against Coronavirus
- Seemingly Happiest People Often Suffer From Depression
- Blog | Not Music Or Art, But It's 'Fear' That Binds Us Together
- Restructuring Indian Railways’ Cadres: Is The Proposal Good For The Nation?
- In Chasing Away Maoists, Odisha's Malkangiri Village Delivers Telling Message This R-Day
- Vasundhara Raje, Who Attended Party With Kanika Kapoor, Tests Negative For Coronavirus
- Coronavirus: UP Govt To Give Rs 1,000 To Daily Wage Labourers, Construction Workers
- MP: 22 Rebel Congress MLAs Join BJP; Scindia Says Everyone Will Get Tickets
- Clapping Won't Help, Country Needs Economic Package: Rahul's Jibe At PM Modi
- Some To Protest From Balconies Against NRC, CAA During Janta Curfew
- Coronavirus: SC Lawyer Bodies Appeal To CJI To Declare Holidays For 2-4 Weeks
- Mary Kom Breaks Quarantine Protocol Amid Coronavirus Scare
- Coronavirus Grows, As Do Questions: Will The Tokyo Olympics Open?