Once its Diamond Jubilee celebrations are over, the three-member Election Commission will discuss amendment of the Constitution to see that the CEC does not have the power to remove an Election Commissioner.
"I don't believe that I have the power. I have the power only of consensus. We are a three-member Commission. Only for administrative reasons, there is a CEC. Otherwise our powers are completely equal," Chief Election Commissioner Navin Chawla told PTI in an interview.
Chawla, against whom his predecessor N Gopalaswami had made the unprecedented recommendation for his removal last year, said that since the CEC does not have such a power, the Constitution should reflect that position.
As the Commission celebrates the Diamond Jubilee on Monday, he felt that a multi-member Commission is "ideal" on several grounds.
Asked what has been the government's reaction to his view on the issue, Chawla, who will demit office in July after more than a year as CEC, said he has still not written to the government.
"I propose to consider that (writing to the government) after the Diamond Jubilee celebrations. I have not written yet. We have to discuss it in the Commission," he said.
Chawla had assumed the office after the first phase of Lok Sabha polls last year following government's rejection his predecessor's recommendation for his removal on the alleged ground of "partisanship".
Article 324 of the Constitution provides that while the CEC shall be removed only by an impeachment procedure, the other ECs shall not be removed except on the recommendation of the CEC.
The BJP relied on this provision to seek the removal of Chawla and Gopalaswami had also insisted that he had such a power.
The CEC had earlier said he will write to the government making his recommendation for the Constitutional amendment.
To a question whether he was going to consult the other Commissioners on the issue since the Constitution vested such a power only in the CEC, Chawla said, "I never do anything without consultation with others. That is why I say we are a three-member Commission. The Full Commission takes a view on everything."
Asked if he was ready to sacrifice the power of the CEC to recommend removal of an EC, Chawla said, "You have to read the Constitution with the letter and spirit of the Seshan order of the Supreme Court. I must abide by that. I do not think myself of 'I'."
Replying to questions on whether the Commission should be single member or multi-member, he said, "I think a three-member Commission is ideal. The reason is by definition if any institution is a single member then that person takes with him or her their experiences when they retire."
With three members, Chawla said, even if one person retires, two others remain. That would lead to moving the lessons of the past and good practices of the present and future from one Commission to another, Chawla said, adding, "So there is continuity. There is great strength in my view."
He ruled out the possibility of differences among the members coming in the way of effective or efficient functioning.
"I think it devolves on a good chairman to carry foward the work in complete harmony. We work in complete harmony. It is already 15-16 years since (T N) Seshan's time, and it has been a multi-member Commission. It has worked well," he said.
He said when three individuals were there, there were bound to be different perceptions.
"We would expect that. Otherwise why have three if everybody had to have necessarily the same view. But we must harmonise," the CEC said.
Chawla said that two Commissioners could overrule the CEC though it has not happened at the moment "because we feel with three, you get better inputs".
"After all before a decision is taken, there is an extensive discussion and if then we don't get divergent views, then why have three, we can as well have one. I think the strength lies in multi-member Commission and it has been proved," he said.
Poll Panel to Discuss Statute Change on EC Removal
THE LATEST ISSUE
- In Absence Of Ailing Paswan, Son Chirag Left To Fight His Own Battle In Bihar Polls
- RCB Vs DC LIVE: Udana Gets Dhawan; Delhi 88/2 (11)
- JEE Advanced Cut Off Lowest In Recent Years, Here’s Why?
- Hathras Case: Forensic Report That Denied Rape Contains No Value, Say Medical Experts
- Covid-19 And The Dream Of Aatma Nirbhar Bharat
- IPL 2020: KL Rahul’s Record Century, Yuzvendra Chahal’s Clever Bowling Highlights Of Week 1
- IPL 2020: Emergence Of The Team Psychologist And T20 Spinner
- IPL 2020: Expect Run Outs, Batting Collapses And Run Freeze In Initial Matches In UAE
- Woman Scribes' Rift Over Rhea Chakraborty Exposes TV-Print Divide
- Brace For Exciting England-Australia Clash As Old Enemies Meet In New World
- Sports And National Education Policy: A Flawed Understanding
- Smriti Irani Calls Rahul Gandhi A 'VIP Kisan'
- 2 CRPF Personnel Killed In Terrorist Attack In Kashmir’s Pampore
- Trio Wins Nobel Prize In Medicine For Discovery Of Hepatitis C Virus
- Delhi Riots: Umar Khalid Sent To 14 Days Judicial Custody
- AIIMS Report A 'Slap' On Those 'Defaming' Maharashtra: Minister
- Scientists Say ‘Feluda’ Test Could Help India Battle COVID-19
- Amit Mishra's Season Ends
- Cavani To Man Utd, Depay To Barca: Possible Transfer Deadline Day Deals