The Supreme Court today said mere observations made by it cannot be treated as a law or a precedent and a review petition in exceptional circumstances can be filed in High Courts even after the apex court had dismissed a special leave petition.
A bench of justices Markandeya Katju and Gyan Sudha Mishra said in a judgement that the apex court court cannot take affront if the high court entertains a review petition even after the Supreme Court had dismissed a special leave petition.
"In our opinion, the above observations cannot be treated as a precedent at all. We are not afraid of affronts. What has to be seen is whether a legal principle is laid down or not. It is totally irrelevant whether we have been affronted or not."
"A mere stray observation of this court, in our opinion, would not amount to a precedent. The above observation of this court is, in our opinion, a mere stray observation and hence not a precedent, " the bench said.
The apex court passed the ruling while upholding an appeal by Gangadhara Rao challenging the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court to dismiss his petition in a property dispute on the ground that his SLP was already dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Rao had contended his SLP was dismissed without assigning any reason by the apex court and hence a review petition before the high court was maintainable.
Agreeing with the view, the apex court said "by a judicial order, the power of review cannot be taken away as that has been conferred by the statute or the Constitution. This court by judicial orders cannot amend the statute or the Constitution."
The apex court said a special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India is a discretionary remedy and, hence, it can be dismissed for a variety of reasons and not necessarily on merits.
"We cannot say what was in the mind of the court while dismissing the special leave petition without giving any reason. Hence, when a special leave petition is dismissed without giving any reason, there is no merger of the judgment of the High Court with the order of this Court. Hence, the judgment of the High Court can be reviewed since it continues to exist, though the scope of the review petition is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record," the bench said.
HCs Can Hear Petitions Even After We Dismiss It: SC
READ MORE IN:
THE LATEST ISSUE
- Delhi Court To Hear M J Akbar's Criminal Defamation Case Against Priya Ramani Today
- As Stubble Burning Continues, Delhi's Air Quality Turns 'Poor'
- Sabarimala Temple Row: Section 144 Imposed In Four Places Of Kerala
- M J Akbar Resigns Over #MeToo Allegations, Says Will Challenge 'False Accusations'
- 7-Year-Old Girl Returning Home From School Raped In Haryana's Rewari
- Durga Puja In Calcutta A Parable Of Life
- M J Akbar Should Be Fired Rather Than Being Allowed To Resign
- Why Kishore Kumar Declined A Cover Version Of His Idol KL Saigal's Songs
- Health Hazards Caused By Contaminated Water Supply In Indian Railways
- BJP Is Unlikely To Flaunt Its Economic Record In 2019 Election Campaign
- Stinking Toilets In Trains: Blame It On Passengers
- Major Changes Likely In H-1B Visas Including Revision Of 'Definition Of Employment'
- Demanding VAT Cut, Delhi Petrol Pumps Call For Shut Down On October 22-23
- Hyatt Gun Row: Despite Raids In UP, Police Fail To Nab BSP Leader's Son
- 'Will Challenge False Accusations Levied Against Me': Full Text Of MJ Akbar's Resignation
- Meet Reshma Nishanth Who Wants To Become One Of The First Women To Enter Sabarimala
- Security Tightened In Surat After Bihar Migrant Labourer Named In Minor Girl's Rape, Murder
- Asian Champions Trophy: India Open Title Defence With Oman Clash
- In Pics: PM Narendra Modi Meets Asian Para Games 2018 Medallists