Home Minister P Chidambaram today expressed shock and disgust over "deliberate distortion" of his statement in the media about middle class attitude towards price rise, saying he did not "mock or chide" anyone.
"He (Chidambaram) is shocked and disgusted by the deliberate distortion of the relevant question and answer at the media briefing in Bangalore on 10.7.2012," a Home Ministry statement said here.
"The Home Minister made a matter-of-fact statement and he did not mock or chide anyone. If the interview is viewed, it will be seen that he spoke in a matter-of-fact manner," it said.
The statement referred to newspaper reports on his press conference yesterday in which he was quoted as saying that people were prepared to pay Rs 20 for a cone of ice cream but protest against a rupee hike in wheat and rice prices.
The statement said Chidambaram used the word "we". He did not use the words "why do they make so much noise about price rise".
"We are prepared to pay rupees twenty for an ice cream cone but won't pay one rupee more for a kilo of wheat or rice," he was quoted as saying in today's statement.
He did not say, "There needn't be any complaint for price rise when things are on the side of poor farmers. The report is, therefore, a complete distortion of his statements," it said.
The Home Minister answered a question on the burden on the common man and referred to the different segments of the population and the schemes that benefit the different segments, it said.
He referred to higher minimum support price (as benefiting the farmers); MGNREGA (as benefiting the rural poor); mid-day meal scheme (as benefiting millions of children); and he referred to PMGSY (as benefiting thousands of villages).
The Home Minister referred to the price of crude oil and how the government was constrained to first raise petrol prices and then how it was reduced twice to benefit the middle class.
Quoting exact text of the answer, the statement said Chidambaram then said, "You mentioned high food prices. Yes, food inflation is high. But higher procurement prices will reflect in slightly higher food prices. But higher procurement prices benefits millions of farmers.
"If you increase the price of sugarcane, sugar cannot be cheaper than before. If you increase the price of procured wheat or procured paddy, rice and wheat for the consumer cannot be less. Sometimes, and I have written about this once, we are prepared to pay fifteen rupees for a bottle of water but we will not bear one rupee increase in the price of a kilo of wheat or a kilo of rice."
Distortion of Remarks on the Middle Class Shocking: PC
THE LATEST ISSUE
- Coronavirus Tests Must Be Free In Govt & Private Labs, SC Tells Centre
- At All-Party Meet, PM Modi Suggests Extending 21-Day Lockdown
- Corona In The Chambal, Corona In The Secretariat
- Private Airlines Refused To Carry Samples Of Coronavirus To Pune For Testing
- Why COVID-19 Outbreak In India's Slums Will Be Disastrous For The Urban Poor
- Chronology Is Clear: MPLADS Abolition Leaves MPs At The Mercy Of Centre
- Bollywood Needs A New Ecosystem To Bring Its Economy Back On Track After Corona
- 'Corona Jihad', 'Tablighi Virus'...Would 'Mandir Virus' Be Okay In Such Intolerant Times?
- Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayan Then and Now: Politics Of An Epic Kind
- Blog: Kashmiris Have Lived Through Many A Lockdown. They Could Advise World On How To Face One
- Dipak Misra Was Reviled As CJI But Ranjan Gogoi Beguiled His Way To Power
- Coronavirus Hotspots In 15 UP Districts To Be Sealed: All You Need To Know
- Mumbai Makes Masks Compulsory In Public, Violators To Face Action
- Opinion: Animal World May Not Be Immune To Coronavirus Pandemic
- Phased Rollback Of Lockdown Most Rational Approach: Kerala CM
- 'He Was Great': Trump Praises Modi Day After Retaliation Warning
- Suspension Of Olympics Qualification Big Blow For Indian Athletes: Coach
- India's GDP May Plummet To Multi-decade Low Of 1.6%: Goldman Sachs
- Akhtar Proposes Indo-Pak Series To Raise Funds For Fight Against COVID-19