Letters | May 27, 2019
  • May 27, 2019

    This refers to the cover story titled Star wars (May 13). In a country like India, where films have for long been one of the most prominent spaces to engage the masses, it makes sense that many Bollywood celebrities gravitate tow­ards politics. Prithviraj Kapoor was the Hindi film industry’s first entry into Parliament in the 1960s. He was nominated to the Upper House. He was a confidant of then prime minister Nehru who selected him for what was termed as ‘cultural diplomacy’. Nehru often asked him to lead delegations oversees. Bollywood superstars Amitabh Bachchan, Shatrughan Sinha, Dharmendra, Vinod Khanna, Hema Malini, Rekha, Jaya Bachchan, Mithun Chakraborty have all been roped in by different political parties time and again and have been parliamentarians but they did nothing significant in their political avatars except being showpieces. The trend goes on and there are many in the fray in the ongoing Lok Sabha elections. However, it is for the first time that Bollywood is sharply divided on a singular figure—Modi. Anti-Modi statements by some film personalities were issued in 2014 too. But the current situation has brought out all political sentiments to the forefront and opinions are clashing. The hostility is out in the open. Pro-Modi actor Anupam Kher has put it precisely, saying that they are asking the public to oust a constitutiona­lly-elected government and are therefore campaigning for the opposition parties. Bollywood had never been so deeply politicised.


    M.C. Joshi, Lucknow


    It’s ok if Bollywood celebrities enter politics; as citizens of democracy, they have every right to. But political propaganda ­affecting the content of movies is a bit too much to take. Movies should alw­ays exist in a parallel domain, having their own integrity. And it’s no surprise that actors who openly support the BJP government are part of the neo-propaganda movies—Anupam Kher acted in The Accidental Prime Minister to make former PM Manmohan Singh look worse than what has been already made of him in the public discourse; actor Vivek Oberoi even tried reviving his career with an unprecedented scheme of pleasing the prime minister by making a hagiography on him. Of course, a film has been made on Congress president Rahul Gandhi too. What is this! In no other age has Indian cinema been so dependent on politicians for content and so ­invested in acting as an ­extension of propaganda.


    Vibha Singh, Jaipur


    The story of stars divided on political lines in the current scenario is well known, especially if you are active on Twitter, but what one would like to learn about is how the economics of film industries has changed in the past few decades. I’d like to learn how much of a hold the government has on Bollywood. There is a race among stars to get in the good books of the government. And those who beg to differ are attacked by the ruling party’s supporters or branded as opposition supporters. There is nothing like individual opinion anymore. Every comment is seen in light of ­national politics.


    Ram Avadheesh, On E-Mail


    It’s good to track what’s happening in Boll­ywood during election season. It gives us insights into the minds of the people who influence the thinking of so many others. One thing is clear, the pro-Modi stars have nothing to lose as they are choosing the side of power while film personalities critical of the government are going against the tide and are speaking out despite BJP supporters trolling them by calling them anti-national. What’s interesting is, anybody who expresses concern over the increasing communal tensions in the country is branded anti­-Modi. This is dangerous and signals the beginning of fascism in the garb of democracy. Moving on from Bollywood, you should think of a cover on the media, which is also divided into Modi and ­anti-Modi camp. It will make for a good cover: keep the same layout, have Arnab Goswami in the place of Anupam Kher and Ravish Kumar in the place of Naseeruddin Shah.


    Shardul Ishan, On E-Mail

  • One-Liner
    May 27, 2019

    The Prime Minister’s acting skills have wooed these Bollywood stars to support his party.


    Anil S., Pune

  • May 27, 2019

    At the risk of generalisation, I could say that we, the people belonging to the great middle class of India (Forever Stuck In Middle Earth, May 13), are terribly self-centered. We enjoy our ‘cool’ and ‘happening’ life, spend time in air-conditioned malls and multiplexes, holiday abroad, wear designer clothes and jewelry, and eat out. Any government that fails to further enable these luxuries becomes our bete noire. We start drawing room revolutions and war monger on Facebook and Twitter. While our eyes remain glued to the sky, the impoverished masses—domestic help, drivers, hawkers, ragpickers and beggars—are invisible to us. We complain when a government or political dispensation throws crumbs at them. Governments also throw crumbs at us, albeit butter-coated, and we claim we are stuck in the middle earth.


    Richa Juyal, Dehradun


    The important turning point as far as middle class political participation goes came in 2013 with the India Against Corruption movement when Anna Hazare and co invoked a residual ­nationalism in the middle classes, who came out on the streets in protest against the corruption in the then UPA government. It was a moment of great hope for many in the ‘thinking class of India’. The scenes of protest from New Delhi and other cities appeared to be announcing a new era of citizens’ participation in politics. At the time, not many were making much of the election in 2014 as things were more about the present. But, as we came to realise later, a battered party was watching all this from the sidelines, analysing how the new dynamic could work for them. And bang, 2014 undid the Congress and brought in the BJP government to power like never before. The citizen’s movement birthed a new political party and the landscape still looked hopeful. Five years since, no middle class group dares to speak against the government. The tables have turned. But all this proves one thing, the middle class in India is a faux-political class due to its massive privileges vis-a-vis the rest of the people. So, it’s no surprise that the manifestos of political parties don’t talk about middle class issues specifically and dir­ectly. Of course, indirectly, the BJP mani­festo’s very first issue is to do with the middle class: national security.


    Nirmal Vyas, Jaipur

  • Ad Attack
    May 27, 2019

    The May 13 issue of Outlook has 41 pages of advertisements of private universities and colleges—38 per cent of the total page count. It looks very disgusting. We, the readers from 1996 ­onwards, miss the Vinod Mehta days. It is very unfortunate that he failed to create a second-level editorial team. I wish my subscription gets terminated as early as feasible.


    Sankar Ganapathi, Coimbatore

  • Dey Way
    May 27, 2019

    Apropos Manna Dey Diary (May 13), it is not true that O.P. Nayyar and Naushad never experimented with Manna Dey. The beautiful classical duet Tu hai mera prem devta from Kalpana (1960), composed by O.P. Nayyar, and the soulful Umariya ghatati jaye re from Mother India, tuned by Naushad, show that no music director could overlook Manna Dey’s versatility.


    G.C. Roli, On E-Mail

  • May 27, 2019

    This is in response to your cover story Manhandled (May 6). For an article that seeks to highlight how women politicians are treated, the language used by your senior journalists to ­des­cribe them is awful. “Tall, dark and thin!” is what you wrote about Jothimani. Here is how you described Trinamool candidate Nushrat Jahan: “Dressed in a cream Tangail cotton saree with a narrow red border and a matching backless red blouse…” I do not think your writers would have ­focused on the clothes, skin colour and physique if they were writing about male politicians. It’s really ironic considering the discrimination you sought to highlight.


    S. Lalitha, Bangalore

  • May 27, 2019

    This ­refers to your cover story on women in politics (Her Crown of Thorns, May 6). Entrenched taboos and social conservatism discourage women from entering politics, which remains a predominantly male sphere. Women are still mostly expected to play the role of mother, sister, wife or daughter. A few eminent women leaders are just exceptions who prove the rule. Even women active in student politics rarely succeed at the state or national level. Women’s representation in the political space has been rising only at a glacial rate, exposing the hypocrisy of the political class. Reservation to the extent of the proposed 33 per cent will be a step in the right direction. A referendum on the subject should also be considered.


    Jaideep Mittra, Varanasi

  • May 27, 2019

    This refers to The Chief Question Is: What’s Right?, May 6), your story on the sexual harassment complaint against the Chief Justice of India. Our social structure is such that we either shame the victim, or believe every word against the accused. Sexual harassment is a ser­ious crime, but so is falsely implicating someone to settle scores or ext­ort money. Just as the victim’s name is not disclosed publicly, the alleged perpetrator’s name should also be held back until the court decides the case.


    Siddharth Tharad, Calcutta

  • Fate Accompli
    May 27, 2019

    This ­refers to Phnom Penh Diary (May 6). The author seems to have had a good time in Phnom Penh, a city which he wanted to visit, then not visit after reading its bloody history, and then ­finally visit due to his fate. You never know where destiny takes you to.


    Ajay Bhan, Chandigarh

Online Casino Betway Banner