July 25, 2021
Home  »  Blog  »   »   »  The Case Against Modi Is Not Weakened By 1984

The Case Against Modi Is Not Weakened By 1984

The Case Against Modi Is Not Weakened By 1984

Hartosh Singh Bal returns to the 'Secular Nonsense on 1984' with characteristic plain-speaking:

The question, ‘What about 1984?’, is a trap. The case against Modi is not weakened by this counter, but the attempt to engage with it does highlight a secular failure on 1984 that persists. If you consider the difference between the pursuit of justice post-2002 and post-1984, [Mukul] Kesavan’s explicit claim [in the Telegraph—"the reason the dynastic Congress isn’t as dangerous as Modi’s BJP is dispiriting but straightforward: while the Congress is capable of communalism, it isn’t constituted by bigotry."] that is what accounts for the active involvement of civil rights activists in Gujarat and their apathy in practice over the 1984 killings. Many of the activists who have done outstanding work in Gujarat, such as Teesta Setalvad, see no problem in maintaining close links with the Congress. They see the BJP and Modi as ever present dangers that need to be combated, but they treat 1984 as an aberration that lies in the past.

...Madhu Kishwar, always a maverick, is treated these days with well-deserved disdain by secularists for her recent claims that Modi acted promptly and effectively to quell the 2002 violence in Gujarat. Yet, the same people see no problem in claiming Mani Shankar Aiyar, another maverick, as their own even though he has spent close to three decades making similar claims about Rajiv Gandhi’s response to the 1984 violence in Delhi.

Read the full piece at Open: Secular Nonsense

Also See older pieces referenced here:

Next Story >>
Google + Linkedin Whatsapp

The Latest Issue

Outlook Videos