Poshan
Home »  Blog »   »  Confronting Our Encounter Policy

Confronting Our Encounter Policy

Vir Sanghvi in his latest counterpoint:

There is something annoying and frustrating about the way in which the Congress and the BJP are playing politics with the encounter that resulted in the death of 19-year-old Ishrat Jahan and two of her companions in Gujarat

...Ideally, we should have the guts to look our encounter policy in the eye and to confront the issues head-on so that everybody – policemen, terrorists, lawyers and media – knows exactly where we stand.

But of course, we do no such thing. We lose ourselves in hypocrisy and doublespeak.

And when the politicians get involved, they only make matters worse by trivializing the issues so that they can win votes.

Read on

I think his point one and two are unexceptionable and everyone would agree with them. And of course, it is helpful that he is being provocative, so that the problem can be thought through. It's from his point three onwards that things start getting grey. Most thinking people, to my mind would not approve of just bumping off people on the mere charge of being terrorists -- and even if they do, there is a problem with that point of view, as his point four brings out.

People may find it easy to be in denial when they "know" that the people concerned are terrorists -- and that is where VS's own caveat to point one -- and the headline Can we allow a policeman to be prosecutor, judge and executioner? addresses the dilemma quite well.

The real need is for police and legal reforms so that the genuine concerns against actual terrorists not being able to be brought to justice can be addressed. 

Vir Sanghvi in his latest counterpoint:

There is something annoying and frustrating about the way in which the Congress and the BJP are playing politics with the encounter that resulted in the death of 19-year-old Ishrat Jahan and two of her companions in Gujarat

...Ideally, we should have the guts to look our encounter policy in the eye and to confront the issues head-on so that everybody – policemen, terrorists, lawyers and media – knows exactly where we stand.

But of course, we do no such thing. We lose ourselves in hypocrisy and doublespeak.

And when the politicians get involved, they only make matters worse by trivializing the issues so that they can win votes.

Read on

I think his point one and two are unexceptionable and everyone would agree with them. And of course, it is helpful that he is being provocative, so that the problem can be thought through. It's from his point three onwards that things start getting grey. Most thinking people, to my mind would not approve of just bumping off people on the mere charge of being terrorists -- and even if they do, there is a problem with that point of view, as his point four brings out.

People may find it easy to be in denial when they "know" that the people concerned are terrorists -- and that is where VS's own caveat to point one -- and the headline Can we allow a policeman to be prosecutor, judge and executioner? addresses the dilemma quite well.

The real need is for police and legal reforms so that the genuine concerns against actual terrorists not being able to be brought to justice can be addressed. 

Subscribe to Outlook’s Newsletter

Download the Outlook ​Magazines App. Six magazines, wherever you go! Play Store and App Store

THE LATEST ISSUE
CLICK IMAGE FOR CONTENTS


Online Casino Betway Banner
Advertisement