Making A Difference

The Controversy On Tibet

Despite all the brouhaha and claims by the opposition there is no substantive change in the formulation on reference to Tibet in the joint declaration. Updates.

Advertisement

The Controversy On Tibet
info_icon

So has India made any significant concessions on Tibet, without reciprocity from China on Tibet? Yes, ifyou believe the opposition and the critics, but the Minister of External Affairs and his ministry have beenprompt in pointing out that the language of the joint declaration only echoes previous statements issued bythe two countries.

The confusion seems to have arisen because of a much quoted release by the official Chinese news agencythat "the Indian government has, for the first time, recognised explicitly the Tibet Autonomous Region aspart of Chinese territory". There was much talk of the use of the word "inalienable" in thejoint declaration. It was claimed that the in the declaration India was said to have recognised that Tibet is"an inalienable part of China". But a perusal of the full text of the declaration reveals that thiswas mere speculation.

Advertisement

The Ministry of External Affairs has released this list of previous references to Tibet in India-Chinadocuments.

1954: The Agreement between India and China on Trade And Intercourse between TibetRegion of China and India

"Being desirous of promoting trade and cultural intercourse between Tibet Region of China and India andof facilitating pilgrimage and travel by the peoples of China and India."

1958: Notes sent by the Ministry of External Affairs to the embassy of China in India

"The Government of india recognise that the Tibetan region is part of the People’s Republic ofChina."

1988: India-China Joint Press Communique

"The Chinese side expressed concern over anti-China activities by some Tibetan elements in India. TheIndian side reiterated the longstanding and consistent policy of the Government of India that Tibet is anautonomous region of China and that anti-China political activities by Tibetan elements are not permitted onIndian soil."

Advertisement

1991: India-China Joint Communique

"The Chinese side expressed concern about the continued activities in India by some Tibetans againsttheir motherland and reiterated that Tibet was an inalienable part of Chinese territory ad that it was firmlyopposed to any attempt and action aimed at splitting China and bringing about "Independence of Tibet". TheIndian side reiterated its long-standing and consistent position that Tibet is an autonomous region of Chinaand that it does not allow Tibetans to engage in anti-China political activities in India."

2003: Declaration on Principles for Relations and Comprehensive Cooperation between theRepublic of India and the People’s Republic of China

"The Indian side recognizes that the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the territory of the People’sRepublic of China and reiterates that it does not allow Tibetans to engage in anti-China political activitiesin India. The Chinese side expresses its appreciation for the Indian position and reiterates that it is firmlyopposed to any attempt and action aimed at splitting China and bringing about "independence of Tibet".

Tags

Advertisement