- Login | Register
- Current Issue
- Most Read
- Back Issues
The Telangana cabinet today decided to issue four ordinances to amend existing acts.
One of these ordinances will a
The government has directed Internet service providers (ISP) to block distribution and transmission of child sexual abuse
An all-women website, which will focus on struggles and achievements of women with a view to bridge the gender gap in digi
Business models of e-tailers in India are not just running out of steam but even have not worked, says information technol
Softbank-backed online merchant Snapdeal will lay off 500-600 employees across verticals as co-founder Kunal Bahl admitted
SoftBank-backed Snapdeal will lay off around 600 people across its e-commerce, logistics and payments operations over the
The Ministry of Home Affairs website was hacked today, prompting authorities to temporarily block it, an official said.
Dancing to the tunes of a Bollywood number is not advisable to a person who had excused himself from his country's courts
Spain voiced alarm as the US White House's Spanish-language website vanished after Donald Trump came to power, saying remo
Numeric combination of '123456' was the most common password of 2016, followed by '123456789' and 'qwerty', according to r
It's an issue that all news publications have been grappling with since they set up their websites. Bill Mitchell reports in Poynter Online :
The New York Times is testing a price point of $5 a month for access to nytimes.com, with a 50 percent discount for print subscribers.
The Times e-mailed a survey to print subscribers Thursday afternoon inviting their reaction to that pricing plan and asking a range of questions about online pricing.
New York Times Co. spokeswoman Catherine Mathis confirmed in a telephone interview that the Times had sent the survey, but said no timetable has been set for a decision and no decisions have been made about online pricing.
The survey reads: "The New York Times website, nytimes.com, is considering charging a monthly fee of $5.00 to access its content, including all its articles, blogs and multimedia. All of this content is currently available for free.
"When answering the following questions, please think about whether you would be willing to pay for continued unlimited access to nytimes.com.
"How likely would you be to pay a $2.50 monthly fee -- which would be a 50% discount for home delivery subscribers -- for continued, unlimited access to nytimes.com?"
Perhaps a similar survey is called for here in India as well. Historically, Outlook has remained entirely free from the very beginning. Two other newsweeklies decided initially to be for print/paid subscribers only but perhaps found that they were still incurring costs for the websites they had set up and hardly had any extra paid readers. So they too later joined the world wide model of opening up their content for all. The question, however, remains: What are publications to do if web advertising doesn't contribute any significant proportion of extra costs incurred for setting up and maintaining these websites? Hope that some sort of a micro-payment model on per view/click becomes viable...? Treat these website costs as part of brand-building and advertising costs? Keep on waiting Micawber-like for somethign to turn up?