Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill is Anti-Men: NGO

The proposed 'Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill', introduced in the Lok Sabha has been termed as an "anti-men" legislation by an NGO here.

The proposed inquiry proceedings in the 2010 Bill are designed to deny justice to men. The proposed Internal Complaints Committee, as provided in Section 4 of the proposed Act, shall be headed by a woman, according to All India Men's Welfare Association (AIMWA).

Its members shall consist of at least two women employees “committed to the cause of women”. The term has not been explained in the proposed Act, but in common parlance, it means "a feminist woman". Thus the basic constitution of the internal complaints committee has been designed to be anti-men.

Similarly, Local Committee constituted under Section 7 of the proposed Act is chaired by "eminent woman in field of social work committed to the cause of woman" and representatives of NGOs "committed to the cause of woman," AIMWA said.

Civilized jurisprudence of any society requires unbiased judges, whereas the proposed Act provides of anti-men jury, it said.

No man respondent can expect any justice from such biased jury, where it knows that they hold office because “they are committed to the cause of women”. 

"Also, there is a provision for settlement under Section 10 of the proposed Act. A man respondent shall be aware in the settlement proceeding that if he doesn't agree to the settlement proposal by the inquiry committee, the same inquiry committee shall inquire into the charges."

"Thus the proposed settlement mechanism is nothing but an extortion mechanism to rob men of property and self esteem. Such feminist dominated inquiry committee has also been given power to transfer respondent during inquiry. Such power is likely to be used in such manner to deny justice to man," AIMWA Central India chief Rajesh Vakharia alleged. 

Further, all proceedings under the proposed Act is treated as secret. No information about enquiry/conciliation proceedings etc can be divulged not even under the Right to Information Act. It is seen that name of complainant/respondent could have easily been kept secret, he said.

Such secrecy has been proposed to conceal the wrong doing and blatant injustice to men by the inquiry committee, he alleged.

AIMWA said that recent development have shown that Right to Information Act has been used successfully by Mens Rights activists all over the country to expose various injustices done to men through other Gender-biased laws.

In order to conceal wrong doings such laws, Section 16 of the proposed Act conceal all proceedings under the Act from the purview of the Right to Information Act. Rule 26 provides that court shall take cognizance under this Act only on a complaint of a woman or committee.Thus men have been barred from making any complaint against anybody before a court of law for any wrong doing done to them under the proposed Act, it said.

The Bill aims at enslaving men by making them an easy target of extortion and dismissal from service through biased procedure and at the same time deny men any remedy against such wrong doings in the court of law. This is a bill to humiliate men, subjugate men and facilitate ransom and extortion from men, Vakharia alleged.

Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

8/D-63
Nov 29, 2012
09:54 AM

Paranoid, obsessive, 'crying wolf' sums up the tenor of comments by MU. So much so, when a serious issue as this one comes up, his comments run the risk of being ignored.

K.Suresh, Bangalore
7/D-35
Nov 29, 2012
07:27 AM

 MU,

Lighten up a little. Yes, the second sentence (#3) was a mild dig at your propensity to indulge in a rant on every subject no matter how irrelevant

However, the first sentence was serious. See the movie if you haven't already. It is about a woman who (mis)uses sexual harassment laws to get rid of an inconvenient colleague.

Bonita, Chennai
6/D-98
Nov 28, 2012
08:45 PM

The government might as well make it mandatory to have signed declarations prior to making love / sex.

Male Unblocked, Chennai
5/D-94
Nov 28, 2012
08:23 PM

The media may be picking this news item in order to give it more publicity and encourage women to misuse it.

AIMWA has a point.

Male Unblocked, Chennai
4/D-93
Nov 28, 2012
08:18 PM

2 and 3

Some males like you ( in fact most ), alongwith females, think that male rights is a JOKE.

Male Unblocked, Chennai
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: