Modi Interview: CEO Distances Prasar Bharati From Row

In the wake of a massive controversy over Narendra Modi's interview to Doordarshan, Prasar Bharati today distanced itself from the row saying it was completely left to the editorial team of DD News to go ahead and telecast it.

Jawhar Sircar, CEO of Prasar Bharati, wrote to members of the Prasar Bharati board informing them about the circumstances surrounding the interview "as I see them".

He has claimed that a "shadow" still looms over government servants posted at DD which is leading to lack of credibility of the public broadcaster.

Sircar said questions have been raised in the public domain about the impartiality and the motives of the public broadcaster and told the members of the resolutions of the PB board seeking more operational autonomy from the Information and Broadcasting ministry which it did not get.

"A young minister didn't give greater autonomy," he has reportedly written in his letter to the Prasar Bharati Board

In a way, therefore, he said the ministry lost an opportunity to convince a young minister, an obvious reference to Manish Tewari, to break this long traditional linkage between the ministry and the News Division which has continued unabated even after PB was born and assigned its distinct role in 1997.

He also added that "There was no deliberate editing or omission of any portion of the interview. Wherever editing was done, it was for technical reasons and during post-production. There was no interference or control from any authority in the entire process."

The letter comes in the midst of a raging controversy over the delay in the telecast of the Modi's interview and editing out of portions relating to his observations on Priyanka Gandhi and his purported friendship with Ahmed Patel, a close aide of Congress President Sonia Gandhi.

Sircar said if an initiative of the PB board to bring in "external professionals" and change the rules regarding appointment of DG's of Doordarshan and All India Radio had succeeded, "we may not have faced the type of public criticism that a single interview has invited."

About the interview being withheld, Sircar said he was told by DG News of Doordarshan on April 27 afternoon, the day after the interview was done, that his team was on the job and that it would be telecast soon.

"But many of us felt that the subject was 'too current' to hold on and further delays could only cause unnecessary controversies.

"I gave them the 'strength' and it appears that while portions critical of Doordarshan were telecast, certain comments on other personalities were apparently edited," he said enclosing a statement issued by DG News of Doordarshan on the issue last night.

In spite of his complaint about the lack of autonomy, the CEO said he must admit that he had found enough cooperation from the News Division team, over which PB has no real powers.

He offered to lay some of these issues before the board meeting in June hoping that it would convince the authorities to allow PB to function with greater autonomy and professional competence.

He also suggested that the best option now for the News Division is to make all out efforts to seek a balancing interview so that the neutrality of the public broadcaster is not questioned, telecast interviews at the earliest juncture with due publicity and do so without editing.

It would help clear the air and also attract TRPs for DD besides reinforcing neutrality and respect for plurality of opinions, he said.

Meanwhile, Doordarshan News interviewer Ashok Srivastav, clarified his stand saying, "I never wanted to create storm I just tried to do my job as a professional journalist."

Srivastav had in his earlier tweets had said that the full interview should have been aired. "Original interview was 56 minutes but I got half an hour chunk. We telecast 34 minutes. Professionally I feel we should have telecast full version. I also feel that the portion which is important shouldn't edited. I am not final authority."

Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

5/D-56
May 03, 2014
08:50 AM

If you got half an hour chunk, you conduct half an hour interview. Editing an interview is unethical. - Anwaar

For once, I agree.

Bonita, Chennai
4/D-47
May 03, 2014
07:29 AM

When the BJP comes into power along with its camp followers - the straws in the wind already indicate it will - let's see how much freedom Doordarshan and the media in general will breathe.

Ramesh Ramachandra, Bangalore
3/D-31
May 03, 2014
02:35 AM
Comment removed for violation of Website Policy
provethiswrong, FactGarh
2/D-261
May 02, 2014
10:56 PM

> "....original interview was 56 minutes but I got half an hour chunk. We telecast 34 minutes."

If you got half an hour chunk, you conduct half an hour interview. Editing an interview is unethical.

Anwaar, Dallas
1/D-257
May 02, 2014
09:50 PM

These guys must really hate the social media.

Few years back, their lies would have gone unchallenged. Now, they get badly thrashed.

Their "secular and liberal" tendencies, honed over the years by sucking up to the Gandhis still take precedence over common sense, and any self-respect and honesty they might have left. They don't realize that they are likely to get caught, and lose their already miniscule credibility. They brazenly commit the crime, and then run around, trying to save their sorry ass.

Whats InAName, San Francisco
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: