Mere Coincidence That Politicians Benefited? SC Asks
The Supreme Court today refused to entertain a government's plea not not to hear a PIL on alleged irregularities in the allocation of coal blocks and sought an explanation whether guidelines were flouted in allotments.

The apex court, which turned down the Centre's contention that the petition based on the CAG report which is under the scrutiny of Parliament's PAC cannot be considered, said "the petitioner has sought to point out illegality and there is nothing wrong in it."

"This is not distribution of state properties in a small way. It is mines of largesse, not even tonnes of largesse. By the way, is it a mere coincidence that so many politicians, their relatives or supporters were benefited in the 194 coal block allotments," a bench of Justices R M Lodha and A R Dave asked solicitor general R F Nariman.

The other questions posed by the SC to the government included the following and the coal secretary has been asked to file a response in eight weeks as to:
  • Why competitive bidding process was not followed for allocation of coal blocks?
  • What were the guidelines for allocation of coal blocks and whether there was any deviation during actual allocation?
  • Why so many politicians and their relatives figure among the alleged irregular allottees?
  • Whether the guidelines for allocation overlooked the safety mechanism to render the allotments as largesse in favour of private parties?
  • Whether government's objective in coal block allocation has been achieved through the present mode of allocation, which was faulted by the CAG?
The bench said the prayer seeking a direction for alleged "unconstitutional" and "arbitrary" allocation of coal blocks "requires explanation from you (centre) because it is not the distribution of state's property in small scale but it talks about tons of largesse."

Further, the bench questioned as why the names of politicians and their relatives have cropped up among the alleged illegal allottees of coal blocks in which the policy of "competitive bidding" formulated by the government in 2004 was not followed.

The bench rejected Solicitor General Rohinton Nariman's contention that the petition based on the CAG report was "premature" as the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) headed by senior BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi was slated to examine it from September 20 about the correctness of allocation.

"Nevertheless, keeping in view the CAG is a constitutional functionary and whether its report is final or not, it has a value. And here the petitioner has sought to bring point to show illegality and there is nothing wrong.

"Least are we concerned with the correctness of report which will be examined by the PAC or Parliament. But we can rely on it (CAG report)," the bench said adding that "these are different exercises (before the court and PAC)."

"There is a difference in the exercise done by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Parliament and PAC can proceed with the issue on the basis of the CAG report. We don't want to encroach upon their exercise but the petition raises different things altogether. There are sufficient averments which require explanation from you," the court said.

Issuing the notice to the Government, the bench also made it clear that it is confining itself only to the aspect of guidelines formulated by the Centre for allocation of coal blocks and directed the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, file a detailed affidavit within eight weeks on the guidelines and policies followed on the subject of allocation of coal blocks.

The court passed the order while hearing a PIL filed by advocate M L Sharma on the alleged coal blocks scam which has purportedly caused a huge loss to public exchequer.

The bench said the affidavit shall cover the guidelines framed by the government for the allocation of coal blocks.

It said the Secretary should also elaborate the process adopted for allocation of these coal blocks and whether the guidelines had an in-built mechanism to ensure that the allocation of coal blocks does not lead to distribution of largesse unfairly in the hands of few private companies.

The bench also sought to know whether the guidelines for allocation of coal blocks were strictly followed and whether by their allocation, the objectives of policies were realised.

The bench wanted to know what were the hindrances for not following the policy of "competitive bidding" adopted by it in 2004 for allocation of the coal blocks.

Lastly, the court sought to know what steps were proposed to be taken against the allottees who have not adhered to the terms of allocation or have breached the agreement.

The apex court also made it clear that it is primarily concerned with the aspect of the adherence of the guidelines and policies concerning the allocation of coal blocks and all other aspects including the demand for the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities is not taken at this stage.

During the hearing, the Solicitor General informed the bench that the criminality aspect of the alleged irregularities in the coal block allocation was already being looked into by the CBI.

"We are at present touching the allocation part and no other thing," the bench said.

"Our focus is on the issue of guidelines followed in the allocation of coal blocks," it added.
Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

6/D-33
Sep 15, 2012
09:09 AM

 Lately Manmohan Singh's government is getting active in getting things done. Allowing FDI in retail and aviation is good example and sent good signal to foreign and domestic investers. Now if the government gives in the supreme court's pressure in dismantling coal privatization will have opposite effect. If the court and the opposition have their ways then what would be guarantee that the new retail policy will be in force in future? Walmarts need assurance that their invesment won't be confiscated at the whim of courts.

Rajesh, Phoenix
5/D-4
Sep 15, 2012
12:14 AM

Coal has blackened so many faces for ever ,never to be washed/cleaned. With the notices served by the SC to the governmen in the case- Coalgate -,   examination of CAG`s report by PAC appears now being side lined. The matter has gone sub-judice,hence commenting anything byany one may be treated as -contempt of court. To be taken care of.

P.Gautampurkar,Sawai Madhopur,Rajasthan.

Parshuam Gautampurkar, Sawai Madhopur-Rajasthan
4/D-2
Sep 15, 2012
12:05 AM

With SC`s notice to the Govt. in the matter- Coalgate scam-  now examination by PAC appears now being sidelined . The Ho`ble Appex court will examine the case thoroghly and pronounce judgement. The case now gone sub-judice nothing can be commented by anyone else the same may be treated as - Contempt of Court.

Let us now wait and watch. The PIL being examined covers the complete issues needing thorough examination by an independent authority which will be the Appex court. 

Parshuam Gautampurkar, Sawai Madhopur-Rajasthan
3/D-123
Sep 14, 2012
08:32 PM

 Hon. SC should have asked the gov if there were any guidelines available then while allotting coal blocks, instead?

dinesh chauksey, bhopal
2/D-93
Sep 14, 2012
04:54 PM

At last the SC is as they say "seized of the matter". Short of attributing collusion between CAG and SC, no more villification is possible. Of course 8 weeks is a bit too long, but letting the sarkar have a long rope might be just the thing under the circumstances.Let us see the sarkartry and wriggle out, by fronting various secretaries/ lower order functionaries for the malfunction. Where the 2G went Coalgate will follow.Chacko Committee as well as MM Joshi Committee can twiddle their thumbs .There would be no stopping our 'news debating societies'   on the idiot box from putting their various spins on the issues involved. With nill effect on the sinking TRPs.Better stick to newspapaers for the real stories/implications.The same old bunch will be on parade on the Telly.

Dr.V.Mahadevan, Chennai
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: