Angered by Pakistan's consultations with Kashmiri separatists, India today called off next week's talks between Foreign Secretaries, telling it bluntly to choose between an Indo-Pak dialogue or hobnobbing with the separatists.
In a dramatic setback to efforts to resume the stalled bilateral dialogue, India cancelled the talks scheduled to be held in Islamabad on August 25, raising strong objections to consultations held with separatist Hurriyat leaders by Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit.
Shortly before the first of the separatist leaders Shabir Shah drove into the Pakistan mission here, Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh telephoned Basit and told him "in clear and unambiguous terms that Pakistan's continued efforts to interfere in India’s internal affairs were unacceptable.
"It was underlined that the Pakistani High Commissioner’s meetings with these so-called leaders of the Hurriyat undermines the constructive diplomatic engagement initiated by Prime Minister Modi in May on his very first day in office," official Spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin said.
Officials said Singh, who was to reach Islamabad on August 24, told the High Commissioner that "you can have dialogue with India or separatists."
Since Basit went ahead with the meeting with Shah which was to be followed with consultations with other separatist leaders tomorrow, India announced cancellation of the talks agreed upon by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif in May in a bid to break two-year- old stalemate in the bilateral dialogue process.
"Indian Foreign Secretary had conveyed to the Pakistan High Commissioner today, in clear and unambiguous terms, that Pakistan's continued efforts to interfere in India’s internal affairs were unacceptable," the Spokesperson said.
"At a time when serious initiatives were being undertaken by the Indian government to move bilateral ties forward, including towards the resumption of a regular dialogue process, the invitation to so-called leaders of the Hurriyat by Pakistan’s High Commissioner does indeed raise questions about Pakistan’s sincerity and shows that its negative approaches and attempts to interfere in India’s internal affairs continue unabated," he said.
The only path available to Pakistan is to resolve outstanding issues through a peaceful bilateral dialogue within the framework and principles of the Simla Agreement and the Lahore Declaration, he said.
"Therefore, under the present circumstances, it is felt that no useful purpose will be served by the Indian Foreign Secretary going to Islamabad next week. The Foreign Secretary's visit to Islamabad for talks on 25 August stands cancelled," the Spokesperson added.
Ahead of the talks in Islamabad, Basit had invited separatist leaders from Kashmir "for consultations" here.
Pakistan envoys had in the past too talked to separatists from Kashmir before any major diplomatic initiative with India.
However, Islamabad broke from this practice when Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif visited India to attend the swearing-in ceremony of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in May this year. Sharif was severely criticised in Pakistan for not meeting Kashmiri separatists.
Meanwhile, there is a spurt in ceasefire violations by Pakistani army along the LoC which is seen as an attempt by the neighbouring country's armed forces to scuttle the upcoming Foreign Secretary-level talks between the two sides by defence experts.
"Over-reaction to an irritant
Editorial, The Hindu"
"What is really interesting is the reader's reaction to the edit. The Hindu paper gets creamed royally by its readers."
That is what I do for the links that are posted by Anwar. The reader reaction is always far more interesting and informative.
British has finally left India in May 2014, according to Guardian.
Too much ho-haa and waste of "national" energy and time.
Personally, I think we ought to just "ignore" Pakistan. If we run into them at global fora, just say a polite "hi - bye", smile and move on. We ought to have invited others at SAARC and not Pakistan. We did the right thing by completely not mentioning Pakistan in a 15th August speech. I hope we can do the same at the UNGA whether Pakistan makes a big deal or not.
On the other hand if we do want to engage, then using "talks" as a chip is just churlish, childish and silly. Not worthy of a nation with aspirations at the high seat. In this case I would rather just keep talking endlessly but not going anywhere till Pakistan is just blue in the face.
What is really interesting is the reader's reaction to the edit. The Hindu paper gets creamed royally by its readers.
"By THE EDITORIAL BOARD, The New York Times"
NYT can go and screw itself. Why is it interfering in Indian affairs?