File - Reuters (From Outlook 04 August 2014)
Herald Case: Court to Hear Matter Against Sonia, Rahul on Aug 28

A Delhi court, which had issued summons against Congress President Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others, today deferred till August 28 hearing in the case filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy in the matter pertaining to acquisition of National Herald daily.

Metropolitan Magistrate Gomati Manocha postponed the matter after the counsel appearing for Sonia Gandhi and others informed the court that Delhi High Court had yesterday stayed the criminal proceedings pending before the trial court till August 13.

Senior advocate Ramesh Gupta, who appeared for Sonia, Rahul and others, told the court that summons have not been served on accused Sam Pitroda as he stays in the USA now.

Swamy requested the court to hand over the summons issued against Pitroda to him so that he could serve it on him.

The court permitted Swamy's contention and fixed the matter for hearing on August 28.

In a reprieve for Sonia, Rahul and others, the high court had yesterday stayed till August 13 the criminal proceedings before the trial court against them.

"Renotify the matters on August 13. Till that time, the impugned order dated June 26, 2014 of the trial court against the accused shall remain stayed," Justice V P Vaish had said.

The stay had come as a relief to Sonia, Rahul and others including Congress treasurer Moti Lal Vora, General Secretary Oscar Fernandes, Sam Pitroda and Suman Dubey who were asked to appear before the trial court today. 

The Congress leaders have challenged the lower court's summoning orders against them on a complaint of Swamy alleging cheating and misappropriation of funds in the acquisition of the daily by Young Indian(YI).

Pitroda is the only accused who, so far, has not moved the high court as the summons has not been served on him. The high court has now fixed the matter for further hearing on August 13 when the counsel for Suman Dubey and Swamy will argue their case.

While summoning the six as accused in the case, the trial court had held that Swamy has established a prima facie case of cheating, misappropriation of funds and criminal breach of trust against them.

Swamy had accused Sonia and Rahul Gandhi and others of conspiring to cheat and misappropriate funds by just paying Rs 50 lakh by which YI obtained the right to recover Rs 90.25 crore which the Associated Journals Limited had owed to the Congress party.

The accused persons were summoned under sections 403 (dishonest misappropriation of property, 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) read with section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.

Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Read More In:

Sections:
Places:
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.
RELATED NEWS :


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

3/D-54
Aug 08, 2014
10:10 AM

There is no relief. It was clear strategy for Sibal and Co. to go to HC just few days before the summons and give long winding arguments. Obviously the proceedings would carry on even after the date of original summons and legal procedure would ensure the summons on August 8th got stayed. That is why the lower court postponed the summons to August 28th.

RSM, Delhi
2/D-7
Aug 08, 2014
01:17 AM

If these two gets indicted in the court, it will be a unique case in India. Congress is headed by people who did not only help others to rov the country, they themselves also robbed the country whever they had a chance.

george, london
1/D-94
Aug 07, 2014
05:09 PM

The media was screaming "relief" yesterday. How is it a relief if the hearing is simply postponed?

Unless the HC quashes the entire case(which is highly unlikely. A lower court has found prima facie and a higher court does not usually doubt that. Their interference will be limited to bail, dropping some charges etc. They dont usually throw the entire case out), Sonia and co would have to defend themselves in the case.

Akash Verma, Chennai
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: