HC Quashes Centre's 4.5% Sub-Quota for Minorities
Holding that the Centre acted in a "casual manner", the Andhra Pradesh High Court today quashed the 4.5 per cent sub-quota to minorities carved out of 27 per cent OBC reservation--a verdict that may affect admissions already made in central educational institutions such as IITs.

In a setback to the Centre over the sub-quota issue, the Court said the Office Memorandum(OM) creating the sub-quota was based on religious grounds and not on any other consideration.

The December 22, 2011 OM for a subquota of 4.5 per cent for socially and educationally backward classes of citizens belonging to minority communities out of the 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in central educational institutions and jobs was announced by the Centre ahead of the Assembly elections in five states including Uttar Pradesh and Punjab.

The very use of the words "belonging to minorities" or "for minorities" indicates that the sub-quota has been carved out only on religious lines and not on any other intelligible basis, the bench observed while setting aside the sub-quota.

Shortly after the verdict was pronounced, the Congress treaded cautiously, saying the court judgement has to be read and understood.

"You cannot react to court judgments until you have perused, read, understood and appreciated..(We can comment)....After we receive copy of the judgment", party spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters in Delhi.

Setting aside the OM, a division bench consisting Chief Justice Madan B Lokur and Justice Sanjay Kumar said, "In fact, we must express our anguish at the rather casual manner in which the entire issue has been taken up by the central government."

"No evidence has been shown to us by the learned Assistant Solicitor General to justify the classification of these religious minorities as a homogeneous group or as more backward classes deserving some special treatment.

"We must, therefore, hold that Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) do not form a homogeneous group but a heterogeneous group," it observed.

According to K Ramakrishna Reddy, senior counsel who argued for the petitioner R Krishnaiah-- a backward caste leader from Andhra Pradesh, the judgement may affect the admissions that have already been made in central educational institutions such as IITs.

"We have, therefore, no option but to set aside the carving out of a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent in favour of backward classes belonging to minorities out of the 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in both the OMs dated 22.12.2011 and the Resolution dated 22.12.2011. We do so accordingly," the court said.

The first OM states that the 4.5 per cent sub-quota is carved out of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens "belonging to minorities" as defined in Section 2(c) of the NCM Act.

The resolution and the second OM created a sub-quota "for minorities".
Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

59/D-39
Jun 07, 2012
11:30 AM

>>but was not sure how the govt viewed this.

We should worry how the constitution views this not the government. Governments have been raping the constitution when it comes to teh issue of reservation. While Congress trying for Muslim reservation thrice in AP and now once at the centre, with sustained propaganda it won't be long before 'Dalit Muslim' becomes a part of our mainstream discourse followed by a constitutional amendment. Then conveniently, the whole nation will develop amnesia about the constituent assembly debates.
 

RSM, Delhi
58/D-10
Jun 07, 2012
02:54 AM

Ganesan,

>>  have always found the concept of dalit muslims or dalit christians ridiculous but was not sure how the govt viewed this.

The government had no reason to take a stand on it because of the way the constitution was written. It says, " Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph 2, no person who professes a religion different from the Hindu 5 [the Sikh or the Buddhist] religion shall be deemed to be a member of a Scheduled Caste”.

 

Anwaar, Dallas
57/D-111
Jun 06, 2012
06:55 PM

 RSM:

Thanks for the info. If there is no documentation of dalit muslims, it makes no sense to offer reservations to them-because they are non existent. 

I have always found the concept of dalit muslims or dalit christians ridiculous but was not sure how the govt viewed this.

Ganesan, Nj
56/D-97
Jun 06, 2012
04:31 PM

>>I do not know. Do we have a column for "dalit muslims" when taking a census

No we don't.

RSM, Delhi
55/D-78
Jun 06, 2012
01:05 PM

>>Just admit that you have run out of arguments. Your communal bias stands exposed.

Typical mullah! Keeps on ordering everyone to admit things as if this forum is his madrassa.

RSM, Delhi
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: