PTI Photo/ Shirish Shete
File
CBI Probe Against Mulayam, Akhilesh to Continue: SC
Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav and his son and UP Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav failed to get any relief today from the Supreme Court which directed the CBI to go ahead with its inquiry "independently" in the disproportionate assets case against them.

The court, however, dropped the CBI probe against Dimple Yadav, wife of Akhilesh Yadav, saying that she was not holding any public office and she was only a private person holding no position.

The apex court said "CBI is an independent body" and it is free to proceed with the probe against Mulayam and his two sons--Akhilesh and Prateek--in accordance with the law.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Altamas Kabir and H L Dattu refused to alter the March 1, 2007 order for CBI inquiry against them saying that "the proceedings in the review petition cannot be converted into the appeals".

The bench also accepted that its direction in the March 1, 2007 order directing the CBI to place the report of progress into the investigation before the Union Government suffered from "error" and required modification.

The court said it is "not contemplated in the Delhi Police Establishment Act" under which CBI functions that the agency has to file its status report to the government and there was a need for modifying its earlier order.

"We are modifying our order of March 1, 2007 to remove the error in it directing CBI to place the report before the government," the bench said.

The bench said, "Since CBI is an independent body, there is no obligation for it to file the status report before the government".

"CBI, which is probing the case, has to decide what steps it has to take," it said.

While holding that the CBI probe against Mulayam and his sons cannot be dropped, the bench said CBI will take independent action in pursuance to the March 1, 2007 order in accordance with the law.

The bench cleared the UP Chief Minister's wife Dimple from the DA case, saying the "probe against her is liable to be dropped and the review petition filed by her is allowed."

The apex court passed the order almost two years after it had reserved order on February 17 last year on the review petition filed by Mulayam, his sons Akhilesh and Prateek and Dimple.

The court had ordered a CBI inquiry on March 1, 2007 into the alleged accumulation of disproportionate assets by the Yadav family on a public interest litigation (PIL) by an advocate, Vishwanath Chaturvedi, reportedly a Congress leader.

Deviating from the precedent of hearing review petitions in the judges' chambers, the bench had heard the petition in an open court at Yadavs' request.

Seeking a review of the apex court order, Mulayam and his family members had submitted that there was no evidence against them and that they were being harassed by political adversaries.

They had assailed the apex court's earlier order claiming it would "set a dangerous precedent" of allowing political opponents to file "false and frivolous" petitions against their detractors.

Earlier, during the arguments, the Centre, while refraining from going into the merits of the allegations against the Yadavs, had cited a number of judicial pronouncements to drive home the point that the apex court has powers to order a CBI inquiry in "exceptional cases".
Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Read More In:

Sections:
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

3/D-105
Dec 14, 2012
01:03 PM

>> "The apex court said "CBI is an independent body" and it is free to proceed with the probe  ..."

The court may direct to CBI to proceed with the probe. But then, you can only take the horse to the water. You can't make it drink if it does not want to. Hein ?

K.Suresh, Bangalore
2/D-104
Dec 14, 2012
12:49 PM

"The court, however, dropped the CBI probe against Dimple Yadav, wife of Akhilesh Yadav, saying that she was not holding any public office and she was only a private person holding no position."

How so convenient !!! If only Akhilesh had known it earlier, he would have dumped all the disproportional assets on her lap.

BTW, a private person appears to be the most privileged person in the country. Just look at Vadra.

K.Suresh, Bangalore
1/D-39
Dec 13, 2012
02:20 PM

///The apex court had reserved its order on February 17///

So it took almost ten months, after completion of hearing, to deliver verdict on ' if the investigation would continue and if, yes, against whom and where to submit the investigation report'. Should we be proud of promptness of our hon. judges?

dinesh chauksey, bhopal
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: