AAP Says No to FDI in Multi-Brand Retail in Delhi

In a major policy reversal, the Aam Aadmi Party Government today withdrew the approval given by the previous Sheila Dikshit dispensation for FDI in multibrand retail in Delhi, saying allowing global retail chains like Wal-Mart and Tesco to set up shops will result in large-scale job losses.

Delhi's Industry Secretary Amit Yadav told PTI that the city government in a letter has communicated its decision in the matter to the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) of the Union Commerce and Industry Ministry.

"I am directed to inform you that government of NCT of Delhi has reviewed its earlier decision and it has been decided not to support FDI policy in multibrand retail trade in Delhi," the letter written by Yadav to DIPP Secretary said.

Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, however, said though his government reversed the decision on allowing FDI in Delhi, the Aam Aadmi Party is not "opposed to FDI per se".

"It was part of our commitment in the manifesto (for Delhi polls). We are not against FDI per se. This is something that ought to be decided on sector-to-sector basis," he told reporters when asked about his government's first major reversal of policy.

The Chief Minister said though allowing FDI in multibrand retail will improve consumer's choice to a great extent but experience world over showed that it "leads to loss of jobs to a very large extent".

"There is huge unemployment in Delhi and AAP government does not wish to increase this unemployment. Delhi is not prepared for FDI," he said, justifying the decision.

The previous Congress government had taken a number of steps to remove bottlenecks in attracting FDI in multibrand retail. It had even announced plan to make amendments to the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Act to allow direct connectivity between retailers and farmers.

As per the existing provision, farmers cannot sell their produce directly to retailers as it has to be routed through the mandis operated by APMC.

Endorsing the FDI policy, then Chief Minister Dikshit last year had announced that Delhi will become the first city in the country to have global retail chains like Wal-Mart and Tesco.

As per the FDI policy approved by the Cabinet, the final authority for granting trade licence rests with the states under their respective Shops and Establishment Acts.

States which had supported the Centre's decision on FDI in retail includes Maharashtra, Delhi, Jammu and Kashmir, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, Andhra Pradesh and Assam - all ruled by the UPA then.

As per Centre's decision, foreign retailers will only be allowed to set up shop in cities with over one million population.

Kejriwal said his government had to take a decision between better choices for the consumers and unemployment.

The Chief Minister felt the entire retail sector has not been given a "conducive and honest environment" and his administration would do everything possible to help the traders.

"Today, if you want to start the business or if you want to do business, you have to face many bottlenecks because of huge corruption. In the next few days, I am going to have meetings with the traders and industrialists to ask them about steps required to help them," he said.

Kejriwal said trade and business have been generating wealth and creating employment opportunities and his government's priorities would be to help the entrepreneurs and trading community.

"We are committed to creating an honest environment to do business. Ever since the launch of anti-corruption helpline, I have been getting the feedback that officials are on back foot and afraid of asking for bribe," said Kejriwal.

Emerging story. Watch this space for updates as more details come in
Read More In:

Sections:
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
Translate into:
© Copyright PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of any PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without their prior written consent.


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression

7/D-56
Jan 14, 2014
09:17 AM

"It was part of our commitment in the manifesto (for Delhi polls). We are not against FDI per se.

If you are not against FDI, why was it in the manifesto?

This is something that ought to be decided on sector-to-sector basis,

Does this statement mean anything or is it a loophole to allow a subsequent U-turn? Please tell us now which sectors do you think will benefit from FDI and which will suffer? 

Bonita, Chennai
6/D-41
Jan 14, 2014
06:31 AM

AAP did not apply it self when goin against FDI.

Today those who see it as a threat to its aspiration of becoming PM will have a go at it and those who have been propogating FDI will slam it.

About FDI and India a whole lot needs to be understood before making a choice

harun, chennai
5/D-32
Jan 14, 2014
03:58 AM

Strange decision, coming from a party of educated leaders.

Inspite of which, it is still a far better party, than the looters we see under various guises.

Misogynist, Chennai
4/D-31
Jan 14, 2014
03:32 AM

Great decision. Worldwide reviews have shown that FDI in retails in developing countries is a disaster, especially for employment but surprisingly also for bargaining power of farmers. Also, the capital access and cost are very different for big foreign corporations and domestic small shops.

Sachin Kumar, Shamli
3/D-9
Jan 14, 2014
01:52 AM

I think this is a mistake.

Anwaar, Dallas
Order by

Order by

Order by

ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: