Saturday 27 August 2016

‘Maxwell’s Approach To The War Is Superficial’

On key overlooked questions by Neville Maxwell while dealing with the Sino-Indian war.
Outlook INTERVIEWS Bertil Lintner

Bertil Lintner, who challenges Maxwell’s thesis, shares some of his views on key overlooked questions while dealing with the Sino-Indian war. 

Is the Henderson Brooks report adequate to understand the 1962 conflict?

The Henderson Brooks report examined lac­unae in India’s defence before the 1962 war, but it does not explain why China atta­c­ked. One has to put the ’62 war in context­—then it becomes clear that it had more to do with internal power struggles in China than the border dispute, or Nehru’s forward policy.

What was the internal struggle in China?

Mao Zedong launched his ‘Great Leap For­ward’ in 1958 and it lasted until 1961, in which an estimated 18 million to 31 million died from starvation. It was a disaster and Mao had to take the blame for it. He would have been purged by his critics in the ruling Com­munist Party. To regain power and sideline his enemies, he indentified an ‘outside enemy’ and decided to rally the party and, more importantly, the army against it. India became that country. It had granted asylum to the Dalai Lama and allowed him to set up a government in exile on its soil. Additionally, there was also the excuse of the border dispute.


Neville Maxwell, who put the Henderson report on his website, thinks Indians should read it for a better understanding of the conflict. What do you think?

That’s rubbish. Maxwell should broaden his horizons and realise that the border dispute was not the reason for the 1962 war. It is worth noting that China, in January 1961—a year before the war—sent a combined force of three divisions, or 20,000 men, of regulars from its People’s Liberation Army across the border into northeastern Mya­nmar. The target was a string of secret, Nationalist Chinese Kuomintang camps across the border in Myanmar, which were used to launch raids into China. It was swift and over in a matter of weeks. Then, the Chinese troops withdrew to their side of the border—just as they did a year later in India’s Northeast.

So you see a link between these two?

I often look at the 1961 Mekong River Operation as a ‘rehearsal’ for the even bigger operation that occurred in 1962.

How did it help Mao?

You can see what Mao gained from all this. He managed to reposition himself within the party; the army was won over; and his enemies were sidelined, even purged, not Mao.

What areas is Maxwell glossing over?

Maxwell glosses over the geopolitical factors behind the 1962 war, or, I would argue, he is probably unaware of them. His approach to the issue is superficial and lacks substance.

AUTHORS: Outlook
TAGS: India-ChinaWar1962
SECTION: International
SUBSECTION: Interviews
OUTLOOK: 14 April, 2014
Download the Outlook ​Magazines App. Six magazines, wherever you go! Play Store and App Store

Post a Comment

You are not logged in, please Log in or Register
  • Daily Mail

In 1999, India and France entered into a $3.5 billion deal for the supply of these submarines. The first of the 6 subs is out on sea trials for the last three months and is to be commissioned later this year. At this stage, a newspaper in Australia has revealed secret data on the submarines, plausibly stolen from India. Indian Defence authorities have ruled out any pilferage of data from India.

POLL STARTED ON: Aug 26, 2016
Brazil’s Rio de Janeiro is hosting the 31st Olympic Games from August 5 to 21. This is the first Olympics being held in South America and is going on even as a majority Brazilians are unhappy with their rulers. Here’s a quiz on some random Olympic facts and related trivia.
QUIZ STARTED ON: Aug 11, 2016