Banned book: Dwikhandita People’s Book Society, 2003
Status: Fatwa against her for her writings. Taslima is banned from entering West Bengal.
Freedom of expression is again under attack in India. Penguin India should not have withdrawn Wendy Doniger’s book The Hindus. The publishers should uphold an author’s freedom of expression. Shiksha Bachao Andolan Samiti, the organisation that claims that the book has many factual errors, could write a book correcting those errors.
The book under attack is currently one of the bestselling books on Amazon. It shows that censorship cannot keep freedom of expression suppressed. In fact, it breeds curiosity and so censorship is really its own worst enemy.
Penguin India is one of the biggest publishing houses in India. It had all the capacity to fight the court cases it faced. But instead, it compromised with those who do not believe in free speech. It said, “Indian Penal Code section 295A makes it difficult for any Indian publisher to uphold international standards of free expression”. It is true, but my question is why don’t you fight for the abolition of the age-old British law, which is used by governments to ban books, harass and imprison authors? Free speech is universal.
There’s no such thing as national free speech, or international free speech. Like there are no such things as Islamic human rights or Western human rights. Like free speech, human rights are universal. Writers should have the right to write whatever they like. Everyone should have the right to offend people. Without the right to offend, there’s no freedom of expression. Nobody should have the right to spend his or her entire life without being offended. If “free speech” means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they don’t like to hear.
Everyone should have the right to offend. Without the right to offend, there’s no freedom of expression. Without hurting sentiments of people, you can’t bring change in society.
Without hurting the sentiments of misogynists, obscurantists, ignorant irrationalists—you won’t be able to bring change in society. In this country, when sati was abolished, or girls’ education started, many misogynist sentiments were hurt. But should we care about their so-called sentiments or should we help society to evolve? It’s dangerous if the government tries to deny people freedom of expression to protect the sentiments of those who don’t believe in democracy.
Many of my books are banned in Bangladesh. My book was banned in West Bengal too. Its government not only banned my book, it forced me to leave the state too. The new government banned the release of my book Nirbasan in 2012 and a few months ago forced a TV channel called Akash Ath to stop telecast of a mega serial I wrote. The serial was about women’s struggle and how three sisters living in Calcutta fight against patriarchal oppression to live their lives with dignity and honour. She (Mamata Banerjee) banned me to appease some misogynist mullahs.
The truth is I am used for India’s votebank politics. If fundamentalists demand the banning of books, should governments ban them? Should fundamentalists decide what we should read, write, watch, wear, eat, drink, think? Governments seem to give them the authority. Fundamentalists do not believe in plurality of thoughts. They do not believe in individual freedom. They believe in theocracy, not in democracy.
Most Indian secularists do not support me. They support writers who are attacked by Hindus, not those attacked by Muslims. They support Salman Rushdie though, probably because he is not so vocal against Islamic oppression on women the way I am. I’m not a man. I’m a woman. A single woman at that. And a feminist. We live in a misogynistic, patriarchal society and people in this society hate feminists.
Freedom of expression is like rape in India. Politicians and intellectuals do not defend everyone’s freedom of expression like they do not condemn every rape. If I could get the same support as Wendy, the TV producer could start broadcasting my serial despite government threats.