B Ramanji was the first and last person who called ULFA as Hindu Terrorist....
Read what Wikipedia says about this man..
" He is a firm believer of Gandhi-Nehru dynastic rule, and has often proposed it as a solution to many of India's political uncertainties and socio-economic woes."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._Raman
Read letters exchanged between Raman and Italian Waitress..
http://ramanstrategicanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/call-priyanka-open-letter-to-sonia.html
A very good synopsis, Mr Raman. At least some fresh air is blowing here.
You have gone as far as you can as an ex-official, thank you.
Glad the columnist's sober voice is joining those of liberal persuasion who might lack his domain knowledge and experience.
Mr Raman's lip sympathy is not warranted.He knows fully well how his IB to which he belongs carries out their sinsiter plots against Muslims to help the RSS/BJP cause,The cause of Hindutva.He knows well BJP itching for a war with Pakistan in order to come out winners in elections planned and implicated Muslims in the Parliament attack!IB's notorious role will be written in the history books of India with Raman as a co-facilitator.If ever the truth comes out that will another huge setback to BJP.Hence the secrecy.
This is similar to what the SIT under no other than Ragahavan implicated innocent Muslims in the Godhra train carnage which was the handiwork of VHP.If this truth ever comes out Modi and BJP will be gone.Longlive lies and atrocities.
The mitigating factors were examined by the Supreme Court and discarded, end of discussion. The stupidity of the mercy petition rule is that it is now seen as the right of an accused to be pardoned and not a discretionary power of the President. The President seems to have emerged as a super Judiciary. The earlier the courts clarify and more importantly restrict the mercy powers of the President, the better it is
I cannot evaluate the mitigating circumstances that Mr. Raman cites in favour of Afzal, but I do feel that if a major political party makes it a political issue by championing "immediate execution", a competitive pre-poll tussle is set up to show who is stronger in dealing with terrorism. This does not serve the cause of justice.
"The strong counter-terrorism credentials of bjp are evident from the facts that : 1. People in bjp ruled state, namely Punjab, openly eulogise slain terrorists and its relatives are honored." BJP does not rule PUNJAB, its akali. They are BJP partner jut like muslim league is a partner of congress in Kerala
2. Its coalition partner actively prevents hanging of a terrorist convicted of killing martyr Beant Singh. Now it is about coalition partner. MUSLIM league had been coalition partner of congress way longer than akalis are coalition partner of BJP
3. It actively shields terrorists indited in terrorist activities and attacks the Home Minister on the issue. Yeh, Binderwala was not just shielded, but created by congress for political purpose. Then same congress killed shiks in 1984!
That is the nature of politics in India be it Congress or BJP.
I Wonder why you are selective!
The strong counter-terrorism credentials of bjp are evident from the facts that :
1. People in bjp ruled state, namely Punjab, openly eulogise slain terrorists and its relatives are honored.
2. Its coalition partner actively prevents hanging of a terrorist convicted of killing martyr Beant Singh.
3. It actively shields terrorists indited in terrorist activities and attacks the Home Minister on the issue.
In United States, under similar conditions, the state, media and the political parties would focus on the plight of the families of the security forces who were killed in the attack, to which Mr Afzal was an accomplice. The sentencing and execution would be justified as bring justice to the families of the people killed by the attack.
In India, its totally perverse. There is hardly any coverage of the families who lost their bread winner or father or son in the attack. All the media attention and sympathy seems to be reserved for the accomplice to the attack.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
But:
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy: http://blog.outlookindia.com/default.aspx?ddm=10&pid=1669&eid=5
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT