MEDIA COMMENTS
Modi made it impossible for the media to ignore him


Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register
If you wish your letter to be considered for publication in the print magazine, we request you to use a proper name, with full postal address - you could still maintain your anonymity, but please desist from using unpublishable sobriquets and handles
Must See
Published
Daily Mail
Digression
Order by HAVE YOUR SAY
1/D-21
Dec 23, 2012
02:42 AM

Most of the journalists who indulge in Modi-bashing are corrupt, biased and cunning. 

skp
Bangalore, India
2/D-64
Dec 24, 2012
11:24 AM

Ashutosh from IBN 7, may not be a Modi fan, but he is an honest individual.
A rare honest media person.
I once saw him give that donkey abuser that goes by the name of Karan Thapar, a well-deserved bum rap for being a sycophant.
Actually, he didn't directly even name Thapar, but he(Thapar) felt really insecure and started defending himself.
It was hilarious!

Just Joe King
Gotham, India
3/D-67
Dec 24, 2012
11:32 AM

As for Modi not being to better his support base:
Please look at the Keshubhai factor and how he played the spoiler role to perfection in many constituencies.
Moreover, Congress and Keshubhai's Party are representative of an old style RSS/VHP kind of politics which is not pro capitalism as such.
So, Gujarat one way or another, is the first large rightist state in India.
Haryana, is also a rightist state. But it is a small state in comparison.And the irony in the congress and a farmer(Hooda) being in power and promoting largely free enterprise  hasn't been lost on me!

Just Joe King
Gotham, India
4/D-44
Dec 25, 2012
08:39 AM

 Anuradha Raman,

To be honest, Modi's usage of media and myth is just a fraction of the amount of public money that the Nehru-Indira-Rajiv-Sonia-Rahul dynasty has spent to spread the myth of CONgress party and Nehru-Indira-Rajiv-Sonia-Rahul Dynasty laying their lives for the well being of India.

Countless roads, bridges, public institutions have been named after a few members of a dynasty (nehru,indira, rajiv) even though India is today one of most underdeveloped nations in the world and the role of the dynasty , which has ruled for 50 out of 65 years (of free india) in destroying India from within has never been fairly investigated by media.

If journos like you were really honest, you will examine the media's glorification of dynasty and the money trail behind it, but you will not or rather your employers viz the billionaire neo rich industrialist Rajan Raheja will not allow you to do such an investigation.

Ramki
Delhi, India
5/D-5
Dec 28, 2012
12:20 AM

 "Numerous MoUs signed, but not clear how many translated into projects on the ground"

What the heck are you doing? Is it not the job of a reporter to find these things out? 

Rakhal
Philadelphia, United States
  Order by BACK TO ARTICLE 
Order by HAVE YOUR SAY
Order by HAVE YOUR SAY


ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: