The government idea behind the new pension scheme is that it should be at par with the epfo scheme (Rainy Days, Feb 16). But the fact is that nps results have been dismal over the last seven years. Subscribers are losing even the capital invested in the scheme. This is because the system format has been designed so that at the most it’ll generate savings bank account returns to subscribers, a technical drawback of most unit-linked financial products sold in our country. For they are neither insurance nor pension nor investment products, but a money-making tool for operators at the cost of subscribers. NPS should be discontinued or converted into an EPFO scheme with improved office and table management and refinement of procedures.
Instead of this, a much better idea would be to end the taxation of interest on retiree savings. It is very unfair that hard working people who pay taxes all their lives must still do so even after retirement.
New pension scheme has been introduced by government in lieu of GPF holders pension scheme for its employees and it has been extended to general public as well. The government idea behind the scheme is that it should be at par with EPFO scheme. But results shown by NPS authorities are very very dismal and non encouraging over last seven years. Even subscribers are loosing their capital invested in the scheme. under these conditions how it can be called a pension scheme? This has happened because system format and structure has been designed and operated in such a manner that at can pass on at the most saving bank account return to its subscribers in most favourable circumstances and nil or negative return in all other type of circumstances in long run.This is the technical drawback of unit link financial products sold in our country under different names like ULIPS, pension product, market plus product, future plus product etc. They are neigher insurance nor pension nor investment products . By the verture of their design itself they can not pass on stainable return to irs subscribers in long run. It is a money making tool for its operators only at the cost of subscribers. As per my opinion NPS should be discontinued or converted in to EPFO scheme with improved office and table management and refinement of proccedurs..
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT