POSTED BY Outlook Web Desk ON Feb 12, 2015 AT 14:06 IST ,  Edited At: Feb 12, 2015 14:06 IST

On February 10, Jon Stewart, legendary host of the Daily Show announced his retirement to an unsuspecting audience, after 16 incredible years on air.


Here are videos when he talked about Modi and the Indian elections on his show.



And a few picks from his takes on various events:



Read Full Post  |  0 comments
POSTED BY Outlook Web Desk ON Feb 12, 2015 AT 14:06 IST, Edited At: Feb 12, 2015 14:06 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Nov 06, 2014 AT 22:38 IST ,  Edited At: Nov 06, 2014 22:38 IST

The following Twitter Collection is by our most favourite "Twitterist" Señor Dr Majorly PhD, who is still better known as MajorlyProfound.

Living up to his self-description of "insightful" is certainly a daily routine for this self-described "strategist on strategic geostrategic strategy."

Read Full Post  |  0 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Nov 06, 2014 AT 22:38 IST, Edited At: Nov 06, 2014 22:38 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Apr 18, 2014 AT 16:55 IST ,  Edited At: Apr 18, 2014 16:55 IST

Inspired by the success of the viral YouTube video The First Kiss, comes The First Indian Kiss, presented by the Torture Talkies who show us what happened when they asked 20 strangers to KISS in India.

Read Full Post  |  0 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Apr 18, 2014 AT 16:55 IST, Edited At: Apr 18, 2014 16:55 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Apr 27, 2012 AT 23:24 IST ,  Edited At: Apr 27, 2012 23:24 IST

Who should write about India? Last week, Patrick French wrote about Writings on India in the Hindustan Times:

there is a growing antagonism towards the idea of foreigners engaging with India, a latter-day literary swadeshi predicated on the theory that Indians should be doing it for themselves, rather than listening to what outsiders have to say. It is a view that arises out of a justified sentiment, namely that for too long India had to endure books by foreigners which distorted its culture and history. But today, the denouncers of the foreign hand on the keyboard are more often than not vigilantes in search of a crime. In my experience, the people who hold this view most strongly are those who have studied at universities in Britain or North America, and in some cases still live outside India. The kind of career made by David Frost, Daljit Dhaliwal or Fareed Zakaria in the United States would be impossible in India. Although foreigners are occasionally regarded as entertaining and even interesting, they remain a curiosity. I think it’s fair to assume that when Fareed Zakaria, the Mumbai-born son of the Congress party stalwart Rafiq Zakaria, presents his weekly show on CNN, he is not greeted by catcallers asking him what right he has to discuss American politics. He does not face intellectuals in Washington DC who pose, in all seriousness, the preposterous question: Who should be allowed to write about America? Yet this is precisely the debate that recurs, time and again, in India, spurred by people who would not think of applying the same rules to themselves in an overseas context. The British journalist Edward Luce recently published a book titled Time To Start Thinking: America and the Spectre of Decline. Even those American reviewers who disagreed with his thesis did not think to question Luce’s right to write the book. As Francis Fukuyama wrote about him: “In a tradition stretching back to de Tocqueville, sympathetic foreigners are often the keenest observers of American life.”...

India’s writing elite is fundamentally pro-establishment, and dislikes the way the nation has changed. Global power is shifting. It is a different world now, one in which many writers of Indian origin make a living abroad, and the richest person in England is Indian. Contrary to what we are fed, Indian voices are not stifled, but vociferously heard. Literature should not be constrained by parochial rules of engagement, self-censorship or the pious, self-affirming orthodoxies of social media. Creativity should not be stifled by finger-wagging. Let the “Who should write about India?” question be consigned to the dustbin of history. Let Xuanzang go free, to write the books he wants. Let India accept the rest of the world, as the rest of the world accepts India.

Read Full Post  |  13 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Apr 27, 2012 AT 23:24 IST, Edited At: Apr 27, 2012 23:24 IST
POSTED BY Buzz ON Jan 16, 2012 AT 06:14 IST ,  Edited At: Jan 16, 2012 06:14 IST

Pratap Bhanu Mehta in the Indian Express has a brilliant article on What Vivekananda Valued , arguing that his underlying sensibility was open, self-confident and governed by the belief that humanity needs wider circles of identification to transcend narrow identities::

He directed India towards a liberality by reminding us that it was god’s job to protect us, not ours to protect our gods. The distinction of Indian nationalism was precisely that it never saw the nation as the highest embodiment of value. With the condescension of hindsight it is too easy to dismiss this project as either disembodied idealism, or worse still, an assertion of Indian superiority. But embedded in it was the radical idea that India means nothing if it is not going to be a source of alternative values. There is a recognition of pluralism, but not one that sacrifices truth. “We want to lead mankind to a place where there is neither the Vedas, nor the Bible, nor the Koran, yet this has to be done by harmonising the Vedas, the Bible, the Koran.” Whatever one may think of this project, the idea that each tradition could reach to some place outside itself, by working through all traditions, was a sign of intellectual ambition that is now all but lost.

Again, in hindsight, Vivekananda has been read as progenitor masculinity in politics; and he has certainly been appropriated that way. His claim that “for our motherland, a conjunction of the two great systems, Hinduism and Islam — Vedanta Brain and Islam Body is the only hope” has been tirelessly misinterpreted. This quotation is prefaced by two striking claims “Practical Advaitism, which looks upon and behaves to all mankind as one’s own soul, was never developed amongst the Hindus.” And “if any religion approached equality in any appreciable manner it was Islam and Islam alone.” The reference to Islamic body is not to an ideal of power; it is to the central idea of equality.

Read Full Post  |  18 comments
POSTED BY Buzz ON Jan 16, 2012 AT 06:14 IST, Edited At: Jan 16, 2012 06:14 IST
Short Takes
click for more
recent tags
Barack Obama
Minority & Religious
Mobile Phones
Religious Discrimination
Science & Technology
A. Sanzgiri
Boria Majumdar
Dipsikha Thakur
Dr Mohammad Taqi
Freya Dasgupta
G. Rajaraman
K.V. Bapa Rao
Landing Lights
Maheshwer Peri
Namrata Joshi
Omar Ali
Our Readers Write Back
Outlook Web Desk
Outlook Web Desk
Prachi Pinglay-Plumber
Prarthna Gahilote
Shefalee Vasudev
Srishti Gupta
Sundeep Dougal
Sunil Menon
recent comments
The launch of the second volume of President Pranab...
Poll Started on: Feb 05, 2016
After an initial sighting some years ago, the Zika...
Siddhartha Mishra


OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: