POSTED BY Sundeep Dougal ON Jul 29, 2011 AT 23:40 IST ,  Edited At: Jul 29, 2011 23:40 IST

Now that the redoubtable Mr Digvijaya Singh has jumped into the fray ("It's a very bad article and it is seditious also") after the Harvard students who wanted that the university "end its association with religious extremist Subramanian Swamy"  for his distasteful  op-ed of July 16 in the DNA, it is perhaps time to compile our old short-takes and also revisit Salil Tripathi's article in the Mint on July 20:

If the secular, liberal, and leftist Indians want views like Swamy’s to be restricted, then the right-wing nationalists will want views like Arundhati Roy’s to be restricted. This is not to suggest that Roy and Swamy are in any way comparable, except to suggest that both arouse visceral responses of similar intensity among different types of Indians, and India is a better society if it aggressively protects free speech. Disagree with them by all means; challenge them, debate them. Don’t stop them from speaking. Otherwise, as the late Behram Contractor, who wrote as Busybee, astutely observed about the emergency, the only safe topics left to discuss will be cricket and mangoes.

As Sandip Roy points out in the Firstpost, more than anything else, hounding Mr Swamy out of Harvard would only make him a "freespeech martyr".

The Harvard petitioners had better be careful that they don’t make Swamy a political martyr in their zeal to kick him off campus without real debate. That would allow him the perfect excuse to retreat to the safety of yet more newspaper op-eds, where he can sit on a pedestal and lob incendiary monologues.

Let Subramanian Swamy defend his ideas instead, and the whiplash-inducing twists and turns in his ideology, in an open forum...

Swamy clearly does not believe in a pluralistic “open” society. But that is no reason for the rest of us to cede those values in the name of opposing him. To repeat what he once said about Saudi Arabia: “We are not going to imitate them. Our society is different.”

Harvard students should hoist Swamy on his own words. Instead of sending him into exile, they should remind of this inconvenient truth: There is no democracy without debate.

Meanwhile, Mr Swamy seems to be revelling in all the attention that he has never perhaps got before in his life, not even for all his 2G activism, or so it would seem at least going by his tweets of the past few days, where he can of course choose to be selective in what he responds to:

POSTED BY Sundeep Dougal ON Jul 29, 2011 AT 23:40 IST ,  Edited At: Jul 29, 2011 23:40 IST
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
TRANSLATE INTO:


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression
23/D-141
Aug 07, 2011
08:28 PM

 Swamy's house has been attacked. Public disturbance, thus having been manufactured, IPC section 295A can be invoked.

nobody inparticular
Mumbai, India
22/D-134
Aug 07, 2011
07:48 PM

Those who curse Swamy for writing forcefully against Islamic Terror have not come out with a single rebuttal on the issues raised by him.He has tried to analysis aims of the Islamic Terrorists in India .
No point wise condemnation and rebuttal is coming except usual general criticism

What are the points Secus want to contest in Swamy's article ??

a k ghai
mumbai, India
21/D-11
Aug 05, 2011
01:59 AM

Ghai,

>>  I will honestly welcome your point wise rebuttal to Swami's views.

DNA itself, which originally published Swami's article, has published several rebuttals. You can read those. Saves me the trouble of writing rebuttals.

Anwaar
Dallas, United States
20/D-102
Aug 04, 2011
05:28 PM
Comment removed for violation of Website Policy
Kiran Voleti
Chennai, India
19/D-70
Aug 04, 2011
01:39 PM

Your agreeing with Swamy is no surprise at all. I come across some folks on Muslim blogs who are as paranoid and bigotted as you are. Keep well! "

Faruki sahib

I will honestly welcome your point wise rebuttal to Sawmi's views . His Mandir Masjid views I have not agreed though he had correctly stated the Historical facts .
Calling Bigots etc is o k. But I honestly I have not found any one on this board or even else where point wise bring out flaws in Sawmi's Article.

So what are your rebuttals at least ? Hindus and Muslims are Mature enough to see  the truth and .

a k ghai
mumbai, India
Order by
Order by
PhotosNewsBlogsLatest
Short Takes
click for more
recent tags
26/11: Terror In Mumbai
Children
Faiz Ahmed Faiz
Indo-Pak
Lashkar-e-Taiba
Media
Pakistan
Pakistan: Terrorism In
Peshawar
Taliban
Twitter
Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi
 
bloggers
A. Sanzgiri
Boria Majumdar
Buzz
Dr Mohammad Taqi
Freya Dasgupta
G. Rajaraman
K.V. Bapa Rao
Maheshwer Peri
Namrata Joshi
Omar Ali
Our Readers Write Back
OWD
OWD
Poster
Prarthna Gahilote
Shefalee Vasudev
Sundeep Dougal
Sunil Menon
ARCHIVES
Go
SMTWTFS
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031
recent comments
Delhi government has banned all operations by private...
Poll Started on: Dec 09, 2014
More...
Alfred Nobel signed his last will and testament on...
Buzz
More...


ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: