POSTED BY Sundeep Dougal ON Aug 30, 2012 AT 21:45 IST ,  Edited At: Aug 30, 2012 21:45 IST

Shiv Visvanathan does some much-needed plain-speaking in these troubled, politically-correct times and deserves to be quoted at length:

What happened in Mumbai, and is still happening, is atrocious. If Muslims are as rabid as Bal Thackeray, or Raj Thackeray, then one must say so. If Muslims insist on speaking exclusively for Muslims and do not recognise Bodo suffering then theirs is an ethnic of narcissism, and not a secular value. Unless Muslims realise that over a million Bodos have been displaced, the displacement of three million Muslims will make little sense. One man’s suffering cannot be the cause of another man’s celebration. This cannot be the secular way or the secular ethic.

In our society, secularism has to be defined differently. It cannot be a battle between religion and science or separation between state and religion. Secularism is the way we respond to strangers. The stranger is the other who defines us.

The first law of secularism should be hospitality. We welcome the other because he is not us. The other is the reminder that we are not complete as truths, that as fragments we need each other. The second law of secularism can be formulated after the Dalai Lama’s comment that George Bush’s behaviour “brings out the Muslim in him”. Similarly, after the Gujarat carnage I can say that Narendra Modi brings out the Muslim in me. It is a way of giving secular space a meaning where we become the other in their moment of suffering.

Yet, our secularism allows for boundary walls...

I am writing this because I am concerned about the fate of democracy. The situation is tense and let’s not forget that Assam is the state with the second largest Muslim population in India. We need to understand that a coercive minoritarianism is as putrid as bully boy majoritarianism.

The Muslim fanatic and the Hindu fundamentalist both threaten democracy and we need open ended democracy that challenges both.

Read on at the Deccan Chronicle: Confessions of a troubled secularist

POSTED BY Sundeep Dougal ON Aug 30, 2012 AT 21:45 IST ,  Edited At: Aug 30, 2012 21:45 IST
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
TRANSLATE INTO:


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression
20/D-89
Sep 07, 2012
12:06 PM

Arun,

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution saying, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," was passed in 1791, and the courts are still busy settling disputes about the "separation" clause. It is not easy.

Anwaar
Dallas, United States
19/D-84
Sep 07, 2012
11:51 AM

As per Arun Shourie, Indian secularism consists of branding others communal.

RSM
Delhi, India
18/D-82
Sep 07, 2012
11:47 AM

>>but separation of religion and state is the very essence of modern democratic secular countries

Since independence, this was never the essence of our democracy. To implement separation of religion of state in India, first the government has to get out of managing temples. Our seculars will be the first to howl if such a step is even proposed!

RSM
Delhi, India
17/D-79
Sep 07, 2012
11:14 AM

In India secularism for some and not for all.Its how practiced by the pseudo seculars.while some sections of the society want others to be secular while they will abide by thier own personal laws and do not want to be guided by the laws of the land.And this has been cleverly put to gains by the people who often ruled the country.

India is not secular because its the only country in the world who shamelessly want to tolerate the traitors and the acts of treason,do not want to punish the convicts simply because they belong to a particular community even when the apex court given its judgement to hang them.Is this because our secular government is not interested to carry the blame that in India a person belonging to a minority is hanged based on his religion instead of his crime.

Secularism is a farce in India.

rahul
Bangalore, India
16/D-76
Sep 07, 2012
11:06 AM

But secularism in India is interpretted according to ones own convenience while it should have been a way of life.

The people that are most secular are the people who have most sufferers or victims of non secular forces as secularism if found to nest in people who are tolerant,democratic in nature.

In India secularism has become more of a fashion for the politicans,celebrities and vested interests.The so called learned or "Buddhi Jeevis" are the real trouble makers who for thier personal gains vitiate the atmosphere without them getting involved in constructive or productive work to keep the secularism alive.

rahul
Bangalore, India
Order by
Order by
PhotosNewsBlogsLatest
Short Takes
click for more
recent tags
Assembly Elections
BJP
Canada
Congress
Corruption
Haryana
Levity
Maharashtra
Maharashtra Navanirman Sena (MNS)
NCP
Parliament
Shiv Sena
Shootouts - Hate and other crimes
TV
 
bloggers
A. Sanzgiri
Boria Majumdar
Buzz
Dr Mohammad Taqi
Freya Dasgupta
G. Rajaraman
K.V. Bapa Rao
Maheshwer Peri
Namrata Joshi
Omar Ali
Our Readers Write Back
OWD
Poster
Prarthna Gahilote
Shefalee Vasudev
Sundeep Dougal
Sunil Menon
ARCHIVES
Go
SMTWTFS
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031
recent comments
On Oct 19, after the results of the assembly elections...
Poll Started on: Oct 22, 2014
More...
Do you know who is the youngest to win the Nobel prize...
Freya Dasgupta, Rimme Dirchi
More...


ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: