POSTED BY Sundeep Dougal ON Oct 14, 2010 AT 02:14 IST ,  Edited At: Oct 14, 2010 02:14 IST

 

The immediate response to the announcement of three interlocutors "to hold talks with all shades of opinion including the separatists in Jammu and Kashmir as part of efforts to bring peace in the state" have been greeted with at best a more tepid than lukewarm response. Because of other things, this post is just a compilation of some of the recent op-eds in mainstream media:

On the recent statement by Omar Abdullah that " Kashmir acceded to India and, unlike Hyderabad and Junagadh, did not merge with India", General S.K. Sinha, the former governor of J&K:

...the hair-splitting distinction between accession and merger is meaningless. It may be mentioned that in the earlier two centuries many Princely States, including Kashmir, acceded to the British Crown but the people of those states were not given British nationality. It was refreshing that during the nuclear debate in Parliament in 2008, Omar rightly won accolade for asserting his Indian nationality.

Omar’s irritation over Kashmir being described as an integral part of India was uncalled for. That has been our national stand and not that of any particular party as such. Neither his father nor his grandfather ever contested this. On February 22, 1994 the Indian Parliament passed a unanimous resolution asserting that Kashmir is an integral part of India and directing that Kashmir territory illegally occupied by Pakistan be liberated. The National Conference representative in Parliament supported that resolution. [Read on at the Asian Age]

Wajahat Habibullah, the former Chief Information Commissioner and a former interlocutor on J&K, on the same question:

That rather confused me, but in a way it is true because the Constitution of India does not apply to J&K, and they are governed by Article 370 which is a special provision which gives accession of J&K to India. Yes, J&K is different from Hyderabad and Junagarh.

So far as the CM talked of disputed area, he is being accused of voicing Mr Geelani. The Government of India takes objection. But let me draw attention to the Shimla Agreement which has a simple clause regarding J&K. It said we will (bilaterally) discuss all issues, including J&K. So what does it mean? It means that we have agreed that there is a difference or a dispute which we have agreed to discuss with each other. On its part, Pakistan agreed that it is no longer an issue which concerns the United Nations. But this is something they have not come to terms with. But the fact is that from both sides there was a concession, so what is the need to be alarmist about it? I believe that J&K is an integral part of India, but it is the people in that part who do not feel so.

Also, in 1994, Parliament acknowledged there is a dispute since a part of the state is occupied by Pakistan. So there is a dispute whichever way we may look at it. So, you can use this word and there is no need to be alarmed about it. Mr Omar Abdullah’s statement has not been able to establish lucidity. Now he is on very delicate ground. [Read on at the Asian Age]

On the way ahead, Balraj Puri:

In this background, the known differences between the national parties and the separatists of Kashmir, as also between the mainstream parties of Kashmir and Jammu, need to be discussed. The first step should be to reconcile the urges and needs of the regional diversities with which the state is blessed. The failure to do so is the single most important cause of all complications in what is called the Kashmir problem.

A concrete step was taken in reconciling regional aspirations by Jawaharlal Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah when they signed the Delhi Agreement in 1952. This not only provided for the state's autonomy but also included, on my suggestion, a provision for regional autonomy. Whatever the BJP might say today, it is a recorded fact that the Bharatiya Jana Sangh founder, Shyama Prasad Mukerjee, eventually agreed to support the agreement.

The State Peoples' Convention, convened by Sheikh Abdullah in 1968 and which included the entire political spectrum of the Kashmir region except the ruling Congress, unanimously accepted my draft for an internal Constitution of the state which provided for regional autonomy and devolution of power at district, block and village levels, whatever be the final solution regarding the status of the state. [Read more: Starting point Of dialogue - The Times of India]

Also on J&K, two contrasting views: from the CPI and the BJP

POSTED BY Sundeep Dougal ON Oct 14, 2010 AT 02:14 IST ,  Edited At: Oct 14, 2010 02:14 IST
Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
TRANSLATE INTO:


Post a Comment
Share your thoughts
You are not logged in, please log in or register
Must See
Daily Mail
Digression
4/D-63
Oct 18, 2010
01:25 PM
"A concrete step was taken in reconciling regional aspirations by Jawaharlal Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah when they signed the Delhi Agreement in 1952."

No such formal agreement exists between the Center and the J&K state.
Abhishek Agrawal
Mumbai, India
3/D-15
Oct 15, 2010
01:35 AM
Keeping a problem under carpet does not solve it.. it only aggrevates with time. All the Nehru/ gandhi clan seem to be a part of blunders and mess India is in today, be it Ayodhya or J&K.

They never had guts to solve problems. Power, power and power seem to be their birth right or only goal.
Lalit Jha
Houston, United States
2/D-122
Oct 14, 2010
08:43 PM
Pakistani rogue policy on Kashmir(By Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury)

http://www.srilankag...licy-on-kashmir.html
blrajith
Bangalore, India
1/D-27
Oct 14, 2010
05:13 AM
So what was Omar Abdullah's much hyped "I am an Indian first" parliament speech in the no-trust motion during the nuclear deal all about?
Ajit Tendulkar
Seattle, United States
Order by
Order by
PhotosNewsBlogsLatest
Short Takes
click for more
recent tags
Assembly Elections
BJP
Canada
Congress
Corruption
Haryana
Levity
Maharashtra
Maharashtra Navanirman Sena (MNS)
NCP
Parliament
Shiv Sena
Shootouts - Hate and other crimes
TV
 
bloggers
A. Sanzgiri
Boria Majumdar
Buzz
Dr Mohammad Taqi
Freya Dasgupta
G. Rajaraman
K.V. Bapa Rao
Maheshwer Peri
Namrata Joshi
Omar Ali
Our Readers Write Back
OWD
Poster
Prarthna Gahilote
Shefalee Vasudev
Sundeep Dougal
Sunil Menon
ARCHIVES
Go
SMTWTFS
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031
recent comments
On Oct 19, after the results of the assembly elections...
Poll Started on: Oct 22, 2014
More...
Do you know who is the youngest to win the Nobel prize...
Freya Dasgupta, Rimme Dirchi
More...


ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISING RATES | COPYRIGHT & DISCLAIMER | COMMENTS POLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:    a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   
Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic: