Pramila Shende, Manoli village, Yawatmal, looks on vacantly at a group of old women cleaning wheat in front of her thatched mud house. It is for the 13th-day ceremony for her mother-in-law who passed away on February 2. Just two weeks prior to that, on January 14, her husband, Ramrao Shende, 40, hanged himself in the field after he could not pay off his crop debt. His ailing mother’s condition worsened and she died leaving Pramila, 35, and her four children aged between 12 and 3 years behind. He had received the loan waiver in 2008 and had borrowed several times after that.
“He never said or indicated that he was under so much stress. He never discussed money with me. All I know is that he was trying to get the BPL card so that we could get some benefits,” said Pramila, who has never been to school and works as a farm labourer when time permits her.
UPA government’s Rs 52,275 crore farm loan waiver was hailed as a life-saver (literally, considering Vidarbha region was reporting several farmers’ suicides every day) in 2008. However, four years after that, with one Lok Sabha win under their belt, the Congress led government now stares at a CAG report that says, it really may not have helped the person in question—India’s struggling-for-survival farmer.
Ramrao’s suicide may be a case in point. Despite the temporary relief of the waiver, he finally did what has been the inevitable fate of these farmers in the region. Their four acre plot never earned them anything, her relatives say. While his bank loan amount is only Rs 11,000, his friends estimate that he owed much higher amounts to money lenders. Pramila is yet to get any compensation for her husband’s death.
“Ramrao must have become a defaulter at the bank and so he started borrowing from different people. It will be hard to find how much he borrowed but he clearly felt dejected that he could not look after his wife and children,” said Mohan Jadhav, secretary, Vidarbha Jan Andolan, an NGO that has been fighting for farmers’ rights in this area. The villagers have been by her side in the past two weeks.
However, the support may not last. In the neighbouring district of Wardha, Kamlabai Gudhe’s husband Palasram committed suicide in 2006. They received much attention and Rs1 lakh in the compensation package. As soon as any vehicle enters Lonsawli village, where she stays with her son, daughter-in-law and grandchildren, the villagers make caustic remarks—“They must be getting more money. Government will only look at their family, as if we are not in trouble just because we have not committed suicide.” So on. Kamlabai recently fell at home and her son is again under debt because of the treatment.
The fact is most farmers in this village too have farm loans, did get the waiver and borrowed again repeatedly, without being able to pay.
That points to the crux of the matter.
A defaulter farmer, for the past two years has been going to money lenders, mortgaging gold and land to fund the cost of production. Farmers said costs of seeds, fertilisers, insecticides and labour charges have consistently increased and never match the rates they get for their produce. Roughly calculated a farmer puts more than 20,000 to produce a maximum of 4 quintal cotton per acre every year. For that, he gets a maximum of Rs 16,000. The calculations never add up, they say.
None of these issues are new. They very well existed before the loan waiver. And they do so now. “Unless there is a plan for income generation for the farmer no loan-waiver will work. The farmers don’t need waivers, they need adequate loan and competitive market prices,” says Jawandia. Officials also said that without taking into account their social, health and education needs, the farm loans will continue to be diverted to handle marriages, deaths, hospital visits etc.
The waivers have also perpetrated a negative mindset. Bank officials said the ones who could pay back are refusing to do so in the hopes of another waiver. Some farmers also accepted that.
Purshottam Kakde, managing director of the Yawatmal District Central Cooperative Bank said the majority of bank’s NPAs were from the crop loan account holders who received the waiver. “There were no irregularities from our side while disbursing. But of the total outstanding loan amount of Rs 400 crore, maximum is due by the waiver beneficiaries.” He added that once a defaulter, a farmer does not receive loans. “They do not understand that they are not benefitting from the other schemes such as zero percent loans etc.” The farmers borrow from unofficial sources with an interest rate of 5% per month, that is 60% a year.
A Congress stronghold, the farmers pinned hopes on visits of PM Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi before Lok Sabha elections in 2004, 2009. The expensive carrot of loan waiver was dangled and it worked for the election results. And with an eye on 2014 elections, the farmers are waiting for more.
In the meanwhile, they spend their days at the farms. “It is a good exercise and a good pass time. Nothing more,” says a sarcastic Sindhu Lohare, from Dorli village, Wardha. As regards Pramila, who manages to speak only a yes or a no, it is hard to tell if she is grieving for the deaths of her loved ones or worrying about her children’s survival.
Hanuman Lambe, Dorli, Wardha
In Dorli village farmers are extremely protective about Hanuman Lambe, who has a 3 acre irrigated plot. Although as indebted as everyone else, he is a proud father of Sushma who is currently pursuing engineering in Ichalkaranji.
“I used to repay regularly so I got a benefit of only Rs 15000 when the waiver was announced. However, I borrowed Rs 25,000 the following year but the crop failed. And I had to raise money for my daughter’s education,” said Lambe, who had already sold 2.5 acres for his elder daughter’s marriage. He now has a crop loan of nearly Rs 58,000 and has got 10-12 quintal cotton this year. At best, he will earn about Rs 48,000 in the market this year. He has to purchase seed, fertilizers, insecticide etc for the upcoming season. And of course we need to add some living costs—for the entire year— to that.
Vilas Zade, the deputy sarpanch and his friend said Lambe was extremely depressed and had started to behave strangely. “We were really worried for him. On one hand his daughter, who is both intelligent and hardworking, had got admission and had to pay the fees in one week’s time. On the other hand, a farmer simply cannot raise Rs. 50- 60,000 at such short notice,” said Zade.
After persuading the bank officials he received an educational loan of Rs 1,10,000 per year for his daughter and he mortgaged the only 3 acre plot that he has. His daughter will get six months after completion of her course to start repaying.
“We have taken a chance. But we don’t know how it will all unfold. These are hard times,” says his wife Sulochana sounding happy and worried at the same time.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
The major alment in vidharba is due to non execution of irrigation projects in time leading to cost inflation which benefits only corrupt political parties. How active are the counselling agricultural centres for farmers? are they telling back the government about the bad crop due to lack of rains/non availability of irrigation facilities. These agri centres should be nodal points with responsibilities answerable for the shortage of production and should reflect the remedial measures needed to keep up the tempo of agriculural production. We saw the power mad congress party, scaled down the corruption of 70000 crores in irrigation and termed it as escalation. More than the industries, agriculture is the source for human living which is cooly forgotten. Whereare we going? The 62000 crore agri waiver of 2008 was without identifying the sources for generation and was a political decision of last minute pushed into the budget. That reflects the poor or absolute emptiness of economics on the political head dictating the government. There should be monitoring of agriculture from the panchayath level and monitored for positive results so that the ultimate national level results are positive. It is better that the party chiefs are educated, administratively intelligent and wise in economcs. Unless this happens in India, under a corruption corroded party chief like congress will continue to destroy our country gifted by nature with all resources for a prospering prosperous country. One important factor is intelligent water management for homogenous agricultural prosperity.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT