Why do we like Anushka Sharma? She refuses to be measured on the Bollywood scale of vanity, delusion or daddy’s sugar. Which is to say she is not statuesque, connected, desperate or surnamed Khan or Kapoor. So, we actually have no reason to like her. But we have seen her movies, failed to dislike them and then bemusedly commented to friends, “That Anushka Sharma is good, huh?”
That can be rated as high praise for anyone belonging to this generation of Indian youth that mulishly queue up, come hail or shine, for a shot at their 15 minutes of Splitsvilla or Roadies fame. What Anushka did though, is refused to be a prop to Shahrukh Khan in her 2008 debut film Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi; stood out in the unassuming 2010 hit Band Baaja Baaraat; implanted herself in the Yash Raj Films studio legacy by being one of the last actresses he directed in his life; and now bagged enviable roles in upcoming films by Vishal Bhardwaj, Anurag Kashyap and Rajkumar Hirani. The last bit of that statement can also be taken as a hint to her evolution as an actress.
But at 25, Anushka has already been in the show business for five years. This makes you wonder where she might find the experience that is a necessary ingredient for acting chops. She seems to wonder about this as well. “I’ve used up all my experience up till now in my work. If I don’t have perspective, or new experiences, how am I going to grow as an actress? I’m older and more mature. I’m becoming more responsible and learning new things at work. I learnt to ride a bike for Jab Tak Hai Jaan. But my life now revolves around going to a film set, meeting people and attending award functions. Then I go home and spend the remaining time with my family. That’s not enough,” she confesses. “For me to be able to portray reality on screen I have to be able to witness it. It’s thus important for me to just get away, take off,” she adds.
And that’s exactly what she did recently, she says. Flew to Spain with a friend on a backpacking trip, where they made plans as they went along, booking tickets only a day in advance. “I think it’s very important to be...I won’t say, normal, because I think I’m pretty normal...open to new things. Not get stuck in a mould or adhere to some sort of an image that’s expected of you as an actress. Not let your perspective on life get too narrow.”
Besides travel, learning to play the drums and speaking Spanish is also on her extracurricular agenda. But exploring spirituality further isn’t.
Sequinned baby doll dress, Roberto Cavalli; ‘Serpenti’ wrap watch, Bulgari
Hair and makeup: Namrata Soni; junior fashion stylist: Ria Kamat; bookings editor: Akrati Fulwadhya; retouching By: Abhilash Augustine at Happy Finish India. (Photograph by Vishesh Verma)
The last time Anushka had graced a Marie Claire cover was in January 2011, fresh off the success of Band Baaja Baaraat. She’d said then that she was interested in spirituality and that she tended to start her day off with a round of meditation. That was then. “I’m not into that anymore. I’m just trying to work without stepping on anyone’s toes, respecting people. For me that’s spirituality. I’m not very religious. I don’t know why but I don’t feel the need to meditate anymore,” she laughs.
While she continues to trip over her words, in her unselfconsciously hurried manner of talking, she adds, “I was very young when I entered the profession. I was a kid with a lot of nervous energy. That’s why I used to talk so much. I feel I’m much calmer now and more confident so I don’t talk incessantly to cover up my awkwardness anymore.”
Coming from an army family, minus any film industry connections, Anushka says she relies solely on her instinct when choosing projects. Sometimes she gets her older brother’s opinion on scripts that she likes, just to be sure. In Vishal Bharadwaj’s next Matru Ki Bijlee Ka Mandola, Anushka plays the role of Bijlee, and is a part of a cast that includes Imran Khan, Pankaj Kapur and Shabana Azmi. She admits she had to push herself more to do justice to this character. But she feels her own performance automatically got better in the company of these veteran actors. Next up are Anurag Kashyap’s Bombay Velvet and Rajkumar Hirani’s Peekay. Three filmmakers with three very different and distinct styles. “I’m at a very exciting place in my career right now. I’ll be presented in three very different ways,” she says. You can’t disagree.
On working with Yash Chopra in his last film Jab Tak Hai Jaan, she has this to say, “No actor can feel their career is complete without having done a film with Yash Chopra. His films were always ahead of their time. I feel a director’s energy always passes down to the last person on the set. And he was such an exuberant, childlike person, with a grand sense of humour. He also seemed younger than both his sons put together. That’s how cool he was.”
The rapport she seems to have with the Yash Raj family is apparent in how at home she seems walking around in their Andheri studio complex. She’s spent an hour working out in the studio gym and orders her favourites from the pantry menu. She’s also dressed in what seems to be her most favoured attire – joggers and a sleeveless T-shirt. “I like loose, baggy clothes. I cannot make myself spend money on designer labels. Maybe because I’ve been brought up in a middle-class background and I remember my mother comparing price tags of two saris before picking one,” she recalls. “I feel very guilty when I splurge too much. I’ve grown up wearing stuff from Delhi’s Sarojini Nagar market or export surplus stores. I don’t think I have to be shopping on Bond Street for people to think that I’m important. I’m a high-street shopper. It suits me, my body and my age. Maybe one day, when I’m older, it would be nice for me to carry a Louis Vuitton bag. Right now, I wouldn’t be caught dead with it.”
Maybe not when it comes to fashion, but ask how the fame and being a celebrity might have changed her, and you can almost sense the wheels in her head turning, weighing the truth of her answer, as she speaks. “I think people start changing around you and then they think that you’ve changed,” she says. “On the other hand, people who know me only from my films come to me with a certain preconceived notion about me. It’s very difficult to get past that. Most of the time they don’t even want to know more than what they think they know.”
There is a mix of challenge and cynicism in her gaze, as she cites the example of paparazzi or film reporters that may make up or exaggerate things. “You do get a little cynical in this industry because not everybody plays fair. But slowly, I realised everybody’s doing their job. I have to be practical about things. I’ve become less judgemental and very grateful for where I am. And that gratefulness is not just because I’m an actress, famous and rich, etc. It’s because I get to do what I like to do. And for that you can take all the backlashes, the controversies, and people passing quick judgements.
“You lap it up because you think, ‘it’s okay, it’s fine’, because I’m getting to do what I love to do. Tomorrow someone may write something about me or some actress may take a dig at me. I’ve realised in my time here that it isn’t going to do any good to them or any harm to me because, at the end of the day, none of it matters. What matters is what happens on a Friday. In the theatre.”
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Long,lean,talented & a fauji's kid- Brilliant!!
i like anushka because she is ready to taske off her shirt at the drop of a hat...u missed one major point... bad article
@Vaibhav:You will never get laid, my friend.
Your right hand shall be your most faithful companion and pleasure provider(I am assuming you are right handed).
I wonder what a person like her, wants to be committed to life, to feel committed. How 'Sharma's in New Delhi, including Manu Sharma, find themselves, is intriguing. Also, it appears that Jessica Lall shouldn't have been in a situation, where she got killed. This applies to everyone, because it seems that people who frequent the establishments where people like Ms. Lall are employed, are broadly the cause of unfortunate situations there, I wouldn't blame the establishments, as I wouldn't have noticed Ms. Lall there, as she noticed Manu Sharma. It appears, the only difference between friends and enemies, is that we dislike enemies, and like friends, and what we like in friends, we dislike in enemies. I wouldn't like my enemies, to be like my friends. It seems, insane, senseless, and friends and enemies are the cause of the problems of humanity.
She flew to Spain to witness reality? Thats the bollywood life
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT