The British did not interfere with this system. However, when India became independent and the Constituent Assembly was convened to frame the Constitution of India, our leaders framed two articles that are relevant to this issue—the Fifth Schedule and the Ninth Schedule.
The Fifth Schedule states briefly that all scheduled areas of the country which are forest reserves and inhabited by scheduled tribes are to be administered by the governors of the states by appointing tribal advisory councils from among the tribals of a particular forest reserve or a scheduled area. Regrettably, no governor of any state in India has ever constituted tribal advisory councils of scheduled tribes living in the reserve forests or scheduled areas of the states they were governing. In this deliberately created vacuum, the chief ministers of the states have merrily administered their reserve forests by leasing forests for mining to private companies, evicting the tribals living in these forests for millennia.
The Ninth Schedule of the Constitution dealt with the fact that cultivable land which over thousands of years had come under the ownership of upper castes should be acquired by the government and redistributed among India’s landless peasantry. Since land revenue was a state subject, the states were directed to legislate land ceiling laws and implement them by acquiring farmlands from landlords and redistributing them to landless farmers who for centuries worked under the most abominable conditions on the lands of the landowners.
Regrettably, only three states have implemented the land ceiling laws legislated by all the states by 1955. These were Jammu and Kashmir, West Bengal and Kerala, the latter two when Communist ministries were ruling there. In West Bengal, the jotedars—as the landlords are called there—tried to manipulate the land records and deceive the landless farmers and the government. This resulted in an uprising in a village called Naxalbari led by the Communist Party of India, Marxist-Leninist (CPI-ML), a faction of the Communist party. In Kerala, the land ceiling was successfully implemented in the plains districts and this has prevented the Maoist Naxalites from organising a revolution there.
In the vacant space created by the central government in not implementing the Fifth and Ninth Schedules of the Constitution, the CPI-ML that has today, after many mutations, evolved into the Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-Maoist) stepped in. Since the 1970s, they have organised the scheduled castes and tribes who were deliberately denied cultivable lands and rights in the forest or scheduled areas enshrined in the Constitution. The land ceiling acts legislated by all the states are lying abegging in the statute books, as also the Fifth Schedule as no tribal advisory councils have been formed by any governor.
Today, the states and the Centre are only screaming of the Maoist threat to the country and a mini-war is being carried out against the evil Maoists and the poor scheduled castes and tribes whom the Maoist leaders have organised as their cadres. Nobody wants a Maoist government. But what is the answer to this problem? Is it to maintain a thunderous silence on not enforcing the Fifth and Ninth Schedules of the Constitution? Under what laws have the state governments leased forest lands to mining companies when it is the tribal advisory council which is to decide how to utilise their forest lands?
There is a simple solution to the problem of the forests. They have to be divided into sections of 10 villages. The whole area should then be cordoned off by the CRPF or BSF, and tribal advisory councils constituted in each section. The paramilitary force deployed around will prevent any Maoists from entering this area and also see that the tribal advisory councils are appointed. The councils will then decide how to organise collection of forest produce or liaise with mining companies.
In the states, the land ceiling laws must be enforced by deploying the CRPF on the ground and supervising the removal of land in excess of the land ceiling laws of the state and distributing it to the landless people. The oppressed people will then realise that the CRPF are their friends and not the oppressive arm of a corrupt government.
(E.N. Rammohan is the former director-general of the BSF.)
Apropos E.N. Rammohan’s column Unleash the Good Force, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh are doing enough to make their common border a war zone. Everything is blamed on the Naxals, the lack of infrastructure, and all else. We really need a relook at our anti-rebel strategies.
Rajan C. Mathew, Bhilai
The land belongs to him who labours on it. The revised land ceiling laws must be enforced throughout the country.
Beena Mathur, Pune
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
BACK TO BASIC
Thanks Mr. EN Rammohan for an article containing solution to keep the rebels in check. In reality, only implementation of the Land Ceiling Acts and enforce the fifth and ninth schedule by unleashing good force can pacify the oppressed people in India.
Sir, you said no Governor implemented the fifth schedule and never bother to form Tribal Advisory Council which is to decide how to utilize their forest lands. Here our Jharkhand government has done enough to eliminate the forests by itself.
Hindustan Times, Ranchi on 10th July 2012 reported “with the Forest Dep’t failing to appoint guards in the state, the surveillance of forest areas and the monitoring of development work in those areas have come to a standstill”.
Nonchalant: *There has been no recruitment of forest guards since 1977 when Jharkhand was still a part of unified Bihar.
*After bifurcation in 2000, the dep’t created many new posts and appointed officials at the top level but failed to recruit a single forest guard.
*In Mosabani, there are two forest guards against 14 sanctioned posts, in Mango and Rakha mines, three guards in each range against a required strength of 21.
Interestingly, the dept now has five Principal Chief Conservators of Forest but in undivided Bihar there was only one. There are same numbers of Additional PCCFs and many Regional Conservators of Forest and DFOs for each division.”
The famous Sal Forest of Jharkhand is disappearing constantly. That turns as ‘blessing in disguise’ for industrializations through the Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development (SPWD).
Government passes the buck on industries in the name of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). But how CSR response can be seen in the centenary slogan of Tata Steel that claims to plant 1.5 billion trees but where those are we can’t see. Interestingly, Tata never mention how many trillions of precious Sal trees it has destroyed so far and how many tribals had been evicted from their ancestral homestead and where they are now –nobody knows. Kurmi, one of the thirteen Scheduled Tribes and in majority in Jharkhand, had been deleted from the ST’s list without any notification to encroach their land for industry and mining as the Chotonagpur Tenancy Act (CNT) prevents purchasing of tribals’ lands. Thus the ninth schedule is enforced!
After economical liberalization, errant industries are boosted as they are unchecked by the state or the law, have assaulted our lands, forests and rivers ruthlessly. Now Jharkhand is one of the worst states in the Environmental Performance Index (EPI). Thanks to the crony capitalism.
Last but not the least, inception of the separate Jharkhand helped the immigrants to legitimate their status in the state and thereby repress the nature worshiping son-of-the soil with stark hubris of cultural hegemony. We are called as ‘Jungli’ at our own home!
Please no indignity anymore, we want responsible behavior.
Kade Mahto, Jamshedpur
Wonderful solution!B.G.Verghese to learn from Rammohan that there was no rule of law in India since 1947.How true were the remars of Late Azad,encountered by GOI regarding the Indian Constitution in his rejoinder to his article before his death.
A lot of water has flown down India's rivers since the Fifth Schedule was enacted; clearly this is an idea whose time has passed. As regards land reforms, decades of unremitting population growth has ensured that few really large holdings remain. There is simply not enough land to go around. Where tribal sub plans and huge financial outlays have not brought a better standard of living to the tribal population, economic develpment, including mining, must be given a chance.
bjp employees parrot the official line of keeping vanvasi apolitical. They should not get to have a say in their own destiny. For that end keep parroting the line of educational and health facilities knowing very well the govt schemes in these areas would never work.
RAJAN C MATHEW >> Control of citizens protests by fire power has never helped any administration any where !
I know only two nations successful in exerting full control over its citizens through force. North Korea in keeping their citizens in cage with no corrupting information from outside world. Other successful country is Saudi Arabia. Their method is the combination of force and Islam. Burma tried and failed. China is wise enough not to try.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT