Former BJP ideologue and RSS old-timer K.N. Govindacharya feels that Facebook and Twitter are actually siphoning away crucial data from India and the government, including the PM, is unknowingly helping this process by being active users of their services. Excerpts from an exclusive interview with Arindam Mukherjee:
You say you’re against the use of Facebook, Twitter and web-based e-mail by officials. But PM Modi is an avid user of Twitter and Facebook.
We have no objection to the use of technology but the issue here is of national security. When you open a Facebook account, you have to accept a 12-14-page agreement in which you give consent for transfer of all your data from India to the US and also for any type of usage of that data. The Public Records Act clearly states that no government data can be transferred outside India. And here you are signing a written agreement allowing that. How can you do that? According to our records, 19 ministries are on Twitter, five ministries have Facebook and Twitter accounts and use private e-mail IDs.
So your crusade is against Facebook?
It will not serve the interest of the people of Bharat and will not put the Indian government in good light. It is as if they have acquiesced and succumbed to the pressure. It is the indication that technology is outpacing politics as well as economics.
But this kind of usage has been happening for a long time.
Our crusade began two years ago when hackers threatened to hack the entire nation’s network. Then in 2012, Edward Snowden’s revelations came in and in 2013 it was confirmed that the US was snooping upon the whole world. This year we learnt that the US was snooping on the BJP. Our petition was filed two years ago and looks at taxation, content and law of the land, apart from national security. We have pointed out that companies like Facebook sell our data to big advertisers and firms, and do not pay taxes in India. No service tax, no income tax and no VAT when they should be paying it. We cannot prosecute them in India as they do not have servers in India.
So did you bring this to the government’s notice at any juncture?
When we confronted them, the UPA government said they did not have any official Facebook account. But the new government is using Facebook and Twitter. When in the last hearing we pointed to this, the additional solicitor-general said there was no official account on Facebook and Twitter. Everything was in personal capacity. So even the PMO is being used in personal capacity? Modi has a Facebook and Twitter account. The judges have asked us to file an affidavit. We will file that in a week’s time.
The government is preparing an e-mail policy. Will that solve it?
The e-mail policy makes it clear that, as per the Public Records Act, you cannot use those companies’ services for official communication whose servers are not located here. Here we have allowed government servants to use Gmail, Facebook, Twitter. How effective will the policy be, as only five lakh out of 50 lakh government employees have official e-mail IDs?
What should be done now, use only official platforms or force these companies to set up servers in India?
Three years ago the government heavy-handedly forced BlackBerry to bring its server to India. Why can’t Facebook do it? At the governmental level, a policy initiative should be taken and at the enforcement level law should be enforced. Unfortunately, on both the fronts, governments have failed. We have been fighting the PIL for two years and the kind of feet-dragging exhibited by the governments shows that they are neither serious nor sincere.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Big Social Media MNCs shoudl be forced to host their servers in India. Google, Twitter, Facebook host their servers in Manila and Jakarta, why not they do that right here in Bangalore ? If guaranteed power supply is the concern, then host these servers in power surplus Gujarat.
And yes in last line Shri Govindacharya is absolutely right. Modi should gently compel these biggies to host servers in India.
The truth is that the entire Indian govt is leaking like a sieve and there is no way to stop it from the snooping of the western powers.The technology is so advanced India and other developing countries cannot do much about it.Any curtailing of Facebook,Twitter etc., will have serious reaction from people.Keeping govt functions out of these is one solution.As Mr Govindacharya points out both the BJP and UPA are the same and will not do much.
He has a point but our politicians do not have brains to see through this
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT