While this is one side of economic development, our agriculture sector seems to be getting left behind. When the Green Revolution began in the late 1970s, it brought about a quantum leap in agricultural production in the country, making us self-sufficient for meeting our food requirements. However, the growth and productivity of the sector has somewhat stagnated over the last decade or so. It is important to note that agriculture still contributes nearly 20 per cent of our gdp and employs close to two-thirds of our working population. If we have to achieve growth rates of over 10 per cent, then the agricultural sector will play a crucial role and, therefore, needs a big push.
I believe that the growth opportunities for our agriculture sector lie in looking at markets beyond our borders for our produce. India has competitiveness in terms of diversity—from tropical, sub-tropical to temperate climates. Abundant rainfall, sunshine and soil quality, along with a large arable land mass, make it a natural large volume cultivation hub. We also have a competitive labour cost structure which makes us a low-cost producer.
Picture this, India is the second largest grower of fruits and vegetables. It produces about 130 million tonnes of fruit and vegetables every year, which translates into 10 per cent of global fruit output and 14 per cent of global vegetable output. However, its horticulture exports are less than one per cent of world trade in fresh produce and the wastage is almost 30 per cent of the total production.
The reasons for this are poor post-harvest management facilities, lack of air, road and rail transport in terms of cold chain facilities, capacities and prohibitive costs of shipment. To add to that, there is a limited technical knowledge to meet world standards in cultivation and a lack of interest in implementing stringent food safety and hygiene norms.
But what if this was not the case? Here lies a great opportunity for India to create a foothold in the world's fresh produce market. Imagine fresh Indian produce retailing in all leading supermarkets of the world. Imagine the Indian farmer getting good returns for his produce and every corner of the country prospering. This may sound like a dream but it is very much possible to turn it into reality. What's required is some right steps by the government and initiative by private enterprises.
There are already a large number of corporates engaged in the export of basmati rice and other food grains and we have witnessed phenomenal growth in these exports over the last few years. We must now focus on our strengths in the area of fresh produce and plug the gaps that constrain us.
Horticulture production is a high-risk, yet high-return endeavour. The farmer gets higher returns if he undertakes fruits and vegetable farming. The constraints in terms of produce marketing, storing and handling along with high level of intermediation are current risks that far outweigh the returns. This is an area where corporate participation and initiatives will make a significant difference.
Corporates can bring in the requisite expertise in terms of good agricultural practices, research and development on pest control, irrigation equipment, financing back up and risk cover. Corporate participation also brings in a systematic and structured approach to farming and marketing of fresh produce in both export and domestic markets. And over a period of time the benefits of scale could dramatically transform our agricultural landscape.
A gigantic leap will need to be made to achieve success in positioning India as a consistent quality supplier. Positive policies that promote public-private partnerships in a workable format are the need of the hour. What is also required is the development of vital infrastructure support such a cold chains, roads and transport facilities, perishable centres at the airports to ensure that the fresh produce reaches its intended markets on time. In addition to this, we need to raise awareness levels among farmers regarding the benefits of contract farming.
As part of our vision to be a knowledge economy, we must also develop world-class agriculture universities and institutes that focus on r&d. Newer varieties of seeds developed locally, research on soil and farming practices will help provide us vital knowhow and global edge. I was delighted to note a Rs 100 crore grant to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, in the recent budget. We have made it possible in IT, ITES and telecom. Why not agriculture? The resources are available and it's only a question of initiative and enterprise. Let us sow the seeds of another agricultural revolution.
(The author is chairman, group MD, Bharti Enterprises.)
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT