At a secluded farmhouse on the outskirts of Delhi, on the serpentine NH8, a handful of couples come together fortnightly for what are popularly known as swinging parties. At these soirees, couples—all married and in the 35-40 age group—meet to explore their sexuality with and amongst each other. Following a light dinner, the host, a demure man named Vaibhav, with a gentle, almost feminine nature, introduces the couples to each other, all of whom he has handpicked for the evening after probing interviews. The couples then interact freely with each other in play areas such as the dressing room, the film club, and the ‘grope wall’.
“The internet has broken barriers. Earlier, swinging, like other non-conformist sexual activities, was confined to the rich and fashionable circles. The internet has brought this opportunity to the urban middle class. My parties mostly include married, middle-aged, committed couples who are looking for ways to make their marriage more interesting,” says Vaibhav Singh, a Delhi-based organiser of swinger parties and successful computer engineer by day.
Swinger clubs, like the one initiated by Vaibhav, can be easily found on the internet, says Manu Sachdev, a small business owner and a community-familiar who has been attending the former’s parties for the past three years. “My wife and I enjoy these parties, we feel it helps spice up our family life (Manu has two teenage daughters) and if done in a safe environment can help build our relationship.”
Elsewhere, a young woman meets a man whom she had known years ago on Facebook: a childhood friend of her brothers. Renu, an air-hostess based in Bangalore, has just divorced her husband after six years of unhappy marriage, one which had been arranged by her parents. After endless nights of talking on the phone to Rushab, who lives in Delhi, she decided to pay him a visit. She even decided to stay back permanently, but with one condition—she will not ever marry him.
“I’ve just had it with marriage,” says Renu. “I enjoy being in a live-in relationship, it has all the benefits of marriage, but none of the drawbacks. Some people frown upon my arrangement, but for me it is the perfect solution.”
Just down the road from Renu’s South Delhi home, I meet Sangeeta. For a soft woman of benign, even nondescript appearance, short and pudgy—clad in a simple salwar-kameez—she is surprisingly loquacious. An eager Sangeeta talks freely, almost in a manner of showing off, about her open marriage.
An open marriage is not what people think. Some of my friends do think that I am promiscuous, or that my kids see me with other men. Many of my so-called friends ended their friendships with me, they thought I was immoral, and that the only way to live was in an orthodox marriage, caged in with the in-laws. But my husband and I know that our marriage looks like most people’s marriages, except that we are honest with each other, and that we are happier than we have ever been before.”
Photograph by Narendra Bisht
Sangeeta speaks to me quite openly about how sexuality plays a very big important part in her and her husband’s relationship, especially now, after ten years of marriage, when they have reached what she calls the “middle-age dumps”. She tells me that despite being from an educated, urban background (both her parents are doctors), every cultural standard that she had encountered told her that sex before marriage was bad and that “nice” girls waited until marriage. She had always believed that being a good wife was the one thing above all that she should shoot for, because it was ingrained in her that it would prove her worth as a woman. Now, finally at 35, Sangeeta has pretty much overhauled her views. A three-year overseas stint in the UK with her engineer husband, exposure to glossy magazines, television and liberal faceless friends made on the internet have encouraged her to enter new forms of relationships—something she would never have imagined she would do when she was 18.
When I was a kid, my girlfriends and I teased each other chanting the popular jingle, “First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes (Smriti) with a baby carriage.” In the Indian context, the order of love and marriage was understood by all of us to be the other way around. At this time, such truisms were uncontroversial and as empirically accurate as they were morally prescriptive.
Those were the days when any sort of love other than arranged monogamous relationships dared not raise its head, and nobody would have thought of any other form of a romantic relationship than what this jaunty jingle celebrated.
Baby, carriage and all sure have come a long way since those innocent times. Paths between love, marriage, sexuality and children have multiplied, divided, inverted, eroded and been re-paved. Stories of people such as Manu, Renu and Sangeeta demonstrate that today in India there are more ways of organising relationships and of exploring sexuality than there have been ever before.
Just a decade ago, Indians could not imagine procreation and marriage as separate, or even procreation and sex as separate. We never imagined tolerance for premarital sex, live-in relationships, or open marriages, yet as I interviewed urban, and largely middle-class couples and individuals for this article, I found them speaking eagerly about their unconventional relationships and desires.
The past decade has seen a marked increase in the importance placed on sexuality within a relationship, increasing pressure on the relationship equation with new parameters in the fray.
According to Sanjay Srivastava, professor of sociology at the Institute of Economic Growth, “There is increasingly a realisation amongst Indians that life-long romantic attachment does not guarantee a happy marriage. Romantic love in India, at least through movies and novels, has been mostly built around non-sexual attachments. However, the increasing realisation that romantic love does not necessarily lead to the kind of happiness that it promised, is leading to greater focus on sexuality in relationships.”
A prime reason for this shift, continues Srivastava, is the increasing distance from wider kinship networks. Couples marry, move away to other cities, and are less likely to be under surveillance from kinsfolk than before. So, urban mobility, changing nature of work and, very significantly, the lessening of stigma (at least in some circles) on women having unconventional relationships, is also an important context in this regard.
We certainly live in sexually interesting times, a time during which we are surrounded by hypersexuality in the guise of navel-baring Munnis and gyrating Sheilas, yet we retain our puritan underpinnings in equally exact proportions, and the act of marriage remains of paramount importance.
Unconventional forms of relationships such as live-in partnerships and open marriages are certainly not the norm or the mainstream in India, but through these new paradigms we get a sense of where marriage and sexuality may be headed, not according to statistics that tend to capture the most tectonic shifts, but according to pioneers, such as the people who I have spoken to, who stand on the frontlines. These arrangements still risk being judged, and for this reason, every individual that I spoke to asked for their names to be changed and declined photo requests.
According to Renu, “There is a definite social reward attached to sticking it out in marriage and conforming to prude sexual behaviour. There is shame and a whole lot of stigma attached to changing the rules, leaving marriage, refusing to marry, or opting for a set-up like I have even if it has given me a happier life.”
It is surprising to see the large number of low-conflict, melancholic marriages, mostly in the cohort of people in their late ’30s, 40s and early 50s. My interactions and studies indicated a beguiling paradox: many of the people who I spoke with either felt more comfortable existing within the rules of melancholy marriages/relationships or with breaking them completely through affairs and divorce, than by revising their mindset towards relationships.
It seemed that even though there existed an incentive to bring about change, couples seemed disinclined to figure out how marriage and sex might evolve substantively, and not merely superficially into something better and more satisfying within the existing relationship. This is probably linked to the shortage of marriage counsellors, sex therapists and family psychologists who can speak freely to couples and guide and counsel them. As the uncomplicated (though not necessarily happier) age of the baby carriage comes to end, we are presented with a brand new frontier, one in which the future is uncertain as old standards, traditions and priorities are gently blown away.
(Ira’s next book is on love, sexuality and marriage in urban India)
Apropos Ira Trivedi’s piece (There’s a Whole Lotta Lovin’ Goin’ On, Dec 26), what else can one expect from someone who, if I am not wrong, was once part of the ground-breaking intellectual exercises of beauty pageants? One thing’s in her favour, though: she proved too classy for Bollywood and took to saving the world with her words, however tangled up the thought behind them might be.
Abhisekh Prakash, on e-mail
Why get married in the first place if you want to fool around eventually?
Saj Kumar, Gurgaon
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
OMG !!! We are turning into America .... free marriages, swinger parties ...... Please get this muck outta your minds Gentlemen & Ladies ........ 1 man for 1 woman is the way, it is a norm that must be respected ..... free sex is not a rallying point like women's lib or the ombudsman bill & other serious issues that some of us middle-class people fancy ........ it is unethical,crass & crude, it makes us more animal than refined people with a 6th sense ....... Please don't let these get into your thought ....
Pretty cool.Pretty cool.
I am heading back!
What, is this mix and match new? The political parties have always been doing it.
@Bowenpalle Venuraja Gopal Rao
All that you have said is perfectly valid only in a healthy society where everybody respects each other and what is preached is practised by all. Unfortunately Indian society doesn't subscribe to such lofty ideals. Our society is, unfortunately , one where people who preach about morality to everyone are themselves the most immoral. We are full of people who cry hoarse about 'evil western culture' and don't blink an eyelid when their own children go and settle abroad and adopt western ways. We have a number of hypocrites who talk about 'sanctity of marriage', and yet think nothing of cheating on their wives and keeping mistresses. To be lectured to about morality and good behaviour by such scum is akin to having Adolf Hitler taking to you about human rights! As you have said, you cannot have sex with anyone, but there is nothing wrong with consensual sex between two mature adults. Barring instances of incest or rape, for which there should be strict laws solely to protect the victim, decisions about whom to have sex with is best left to the much cleaner human conscience, than to a delusional society badly in need of a reality check.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT