Now that the Great Indian Election Circus has started rolling, and the NaMo chant is being heard loudest over the others in the campaign din, the prospect of the Gujarat chief minister morphing into the prime minister of India is beginning to raise serious concerns in the West, even among those who have not missed an opportunity earlier to run down the Congress-led UPA government. The Economist went so far as to ask the Indian voter to consider Rahul Gandhi over Modi. “We do not find the prospect of a government led by Congress under Mr Gandhi an inspiring one. But we have to recommend it to Indians as the less disturbing option.”
Other mainstream English-language publications in the UK, US and elsewhere are likewise expressing serious apprehensions about a Modi-run India in a series of editorials and news analysis.
The Economist’s lead article, for instance, went on to say, “it would be wrong for a man who has thrived on division to become prime minister of a country as fissile as India.”
Several other publications, such as the Financial Times, The New York Times and The Guardian, have all come out with articles that ask questions ranging from the security and safety of religious minorities in India to gender equality under a possible Modi rule.
To say that the string of articles has proved to be a major embarrassment for the Modi team is perhaps an understatement. For the past two years, the Gujarat CM and his core group have been trying to spruce up his image as a man of development to appeal to both middle-class Indians as well as potential investors in the West. Banking on their disappointment with the slowdown of the economy under Congress rule, the managers in Modi’s group had gone on a publicity overdrive to offer him as a viable alternative for India. But the strong anti-Modi commentaries in the western media clearly show that there are large sections not only in India but even outside who do not wish to see him as the country’s next prime minister.
These apprehensions and reservations are expressed by many in Delhi’s diplomatic circles, especially those from western countries. And this despite the European Union breaking its decade-long moratorium against him two years back and the regular stream of foreign delegations since to meet him, especially after the BJP nominated him as their prime ministerial candidate. But this does not mean they are not bothered about dealing with an India when Modi is prime minister.
“It will be foolish on our part not to engage with Modi. But our engagement should not be seen as an endorsement for him,” says a senior western diplomat.
However, irrespective of whether it is Modi or someone else who becomes the PM come May 16, many commentators in the West feel that the real challenge for the Indian leadership will be its ability to deliver change. “The revolution of expectations among India’s aspiring masses means the hardest task confronting India’s politicians will not be winning power. It will be meeting the surging demand for change,” writes Daniel Twining, the celebrated American commentator. Now, who’s up to that task?
How desperate can you guys get, quoting some Pakistani journalists and “the West” to bash Modi (The West: A New Scepticism, Apr 21). Who’ve you lined up next to counsel India? Mullah Omar?
Radhanath Varadan, Hanoi
White or Black, in this global economic arena, every other country would be eagerly waiting for the results of the Indian elections.
R.V. Subramanian, Gurgaon
The ‘anglosphere’ always wants the Gandhi family to rule India. Perhaps they feel comfortable with “one of them” holding the reins. India is finally growing up and they don’t like it.
M.K. Saini, Delhi
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
If the western media will only accept European, christian, corrupt, women as our leaders, it is high time we dont respect its dangerous wishes.
modi has spent so much money on lobby groups(Read bribed senators, congressmen and UK MPs) via apco, still has not been able whitewash his true image.
[[This was actually what poor Salman Khan tried saying, but Moditards are too dumb to understand allusions.]]
But I thought it was the Jihadi-turds like you who were baying for Salman's blood for saying so? But then, who has ever accused Jihadis of possessing brains?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT