Mahesh Bhupathi's statement on All India Tennis Association (AITA)
Thank you all for coming, over the last 2 days I have repeatedly been asked to make a statement regarding the ban/disciplinary action taken against Rohan [Bopanna] and me by the AITA. I refrained from saying anything in haste, as I did not want my response to be coming from an angry frame of mind.
In the 18 years that I have represented India my integrity and patriotism has never been questioned, hence I have called this press conference today after much thought and with an agenda to share a sequence of events that should bring to light facts that I believe you are unaware of, and with an intent to stand up against what I believe strongly is detrimental administration for the growth of tennis in India.
With regard to the Olympic tennis fiasco, I have attached with this statement a trail of correspondence between Rohan, myself and the AITA from the beginning of this year, which shows how we did everything to reach out to them to make sure the process was transparent from the very beginning. From the correspondence you will clearly see how the Association was sympathetic early on in their communication, promising to take the input of all the players concerned but then, when there were two weeks to go till the deadline, started acting unilaterally without ever giving us a proper explanation.
I am not here to list my achievements. Rather, I am here to detail episodes of the personal vendetta the AITA and its dictatorial rule have carried out against me over the last decade.Tennis has given me everything I am today and by god’s grace I am able to give back a lot to my sport, be it running tennis events, building tennis courts, raising money for talented kids and even opening academies across the country. However, at every step of the way the establishment has put a spokes in the wheel. So much so that they changed the constitution to make sure we are not able to run any event in India without them being a part of it.
Over the years, funding for programs that I had started to train elite juniors becoming champions was suddenly shunned and multiple roadblocks were created for the kids themselves. I can go on and on with instances but I was willing to deal with all these hurdles along the way on the pretext that the cream will always rise to the top. A lot of the times kids from our program were not given entries but despite all this even today the best junior in the country is Sumit Nagal who comes from our stable.
It has got to the point where nothing they do or say surprises me anymore. As far as that establishment goes I have become thick skinned. Tennis is in my blood and I will continue to do what I can for the sport in the country and if I have to prove myself from scratch again I will. When they crossed the line and imposed this ban on us a few days ago, I could no longer continue to sit and let it pass like I did all these years. My family have spent everything they had and given everything they have to get me to where I am today and at the twilight of my career to face a ban from playing for the county and termed a traitor is unacceptable to me.
Anil Khanna has enjoyed the rift between Leander and me as no other. He has re-defined the term divide and rule and at this year’s Olympics, used Leander's shoulder to fire the gun against me multiple times. Unfortunately the media terms this a Bhupathi-Paes rift and the true underbelly is left unquestioned.
If I am to stand trial after what I have achieved in my sport over the last 18 years, I am willing to, but I need to know who will ask the establishment questions?
Over 80 percent of members of the executive committee have sat there for close to twenty years if not more and they are yet to produce one professional tennis player. The Krishnans,the Amritrajs, Zeeshan, Leander, Sania, Rohan, Somdev, Yuki and even Sumit have not benefited from their system. Yet they continue to hold their positions and go about their jobs in the name of Indian tennis. Over the past few days I have got calls from the Indian tennis fraternity all over the world sympathizing against the Associations actions, each one of them continue to have their story of challenges to tell about the AITA. The association has taken full advantage of the situation knowing that we as players have no authority to question them or to make any stand in our defense. It seems that I have no choice left but to accept this ban and since all of you today are willing to hear what I have to say I will use this platform to ask who has the authority to take this association to task? Either way I am certain every one in the tennis and sports fraternity, past, present and future will be proud of the step I have taken today.
To conclude, I do feel really bad for my friend and partner Rohan who has been caught in the cross fire of dirty politics. As far as I'm concerned I was always banned by the AITA, they never supported anything I did for the sport, only when they couldn't do without me and they needed the doubles point in Davis Cup, I got the e-mail. They continue to misuse the power they have to try and teach me a lesson only because they feel I am able to do a lot more for the sport than they do and in the midst of all this not only did we as players suffer but so did the sport and in turn the country. Question is who is going to take them to trial, for the nations’ sake someone needs to.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Even though there are many parts of his story i do not agree with, the part about Anil Khanna and his cronies is very true. Before Anil , his father had control of AITA AND NOW ITS THE SONS TURN. I had sent my son to train at the academy run by AITA and it turned out to be big farce with net result I lost a lot of money and had to withdraw my son after 3months as there was less training and more politics etc. Its high time the government intervened and takes charge to run it in a professional and transparent manner. Right now its run as a personal fiefdom of Mr khanna and his yes men.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT