The savage greed of the civilized stripped naked its own unashamed inhumanity’
The savage greed of the civilized stripped naked its own unashamed inhumanity’
—Africa, Rabindranath Tagore
Delhi Law Minister and Aam Aadmi Party leader Somnath Bharti’s midnight raid in Khirki village, during which he ordered policemen to search and enter houses, arrest people without warrants, and allegedly said that “black people, who are not like you and me, break laws”—strips naked the unashamed inhumanity of the Aam Aadmi Party regime’s moral posturing. Underneath the holier-than-thou mask of that moral posture lies the unmistakably horrible sneer of the ordinary racist thug. This is the real face of Somnath Bharti. I hope it is a face that the Aam Aadmi Party can turn itself away from.
When Arvind Kejriwal, makes the mistake of trying to defend Somnath Bharti, denying all charges of racism (just as Narendra Modi denies all charges of communalism) he is exposing himself either as a liar (who knows what racism is but is in denial about it) or as a man of very limited political intelligence (who, like most racists, does not understand what racism is when he is confronted with it). In either circumstance, we cannot trust him, or his party, should they persist in this folly, to be the custodians of our city. In order to regain the trust that they are rapidly losing, they have to apologize, not just to the city’s African residents, but to everybody (because racism offends every human being) and pending the results of an enquiry, suspend Somnath Bharti.
Protesters at sit-in against racism, Jantar Mantar, Sunday, January 19, 2014
Should such an enquiry reveal that Bharti did indeed make racist comments he and any other leader found to be making racist and misogynist remarks, (evidence is mounting, for instance against Kumar Vishwas as well) should be expelled immediately by the Aam Aadmi Party. If the Aam Aadmi Party does not take the corruption of racism and misogyny within its ranks seriously, why should we believe that now that it is in power, it will take any other form of corruption seriously? There are many sensible, sensitive and intelligent people who have joined the AAP, in the hope that it represents a real political alternative. It is up to them now to initiate a real debate within AAP and to cleanse their own stable.
Had even a small fraction of what happened, (cavity searches, public humiliation, name calling) to a few Africans in Khirki that night happened to a few Indian women elsewhere in the world, we would have heard no end of it on television by now. Every Indian satrap worth his salt, from Kejriwal to Modi to Rahul Gandhi to Akhilesh Yadav and Sitaram Yechury would have been screaming ‘Racism’ at the top of their lungs. Much air time and op-ed space would have been taken up in righteous and fulsome indignation, marches would have been held, and the foreign ministry would have hauled up the resident diplomats of those countries. and rightly so, because racism is racism. But racism is racism regardless of whether its object is an Indian or Pakistani student in Melbourne, or an Ugandan or Russian woman in Delhi . In all likelihood, in the event that such incidents were to take place, say in Melbourne, some poker faced Australian politician or official from those countries would have said, on record, that the attacks were not ‘racist’ in nature, exactly as Kejriwal, is doing today in Delhi. The Chief Minister of Delhi was handed an occasion to demonstrate his sensitivity on a platter, but he has, as of now blown that opportunity away, and exactly as on an earlier occasion where he had shown that the lives and opinions of Kashmiri people do not matter to him when weighed against the fetish of national interest, so too this time, he has shown us that when it comes to weighing the interests and machismo of his self-righteous constitutency against the safety and security of African women in the city, he would rather be with the ordinary racist (in denial of the explicit and implicit racism of the episode) than stand in solidarity with the ordinary victim of ordinary racism.
During this infamous raid, as is now well known, the crowd of Aam Aadmi Party vigilantes accompanying Somnath Bharti kept some Ugandan women residents of Khirki village confined in a car for several hours, abused them and forced one of them to urinate in public. Later urine samples were obtained from them under duress at a hospital. The mob believed that these samples would show that they had consumed drugs. Incidentally, the medical tests proved that the urine samples contained no traces of prohibited narcotic substances. Apparently, they also believed that the women were prostitutes and drug peddlers. Reports also indicate that intoxicated by their self-righteousness the AAP posse then went on to harass, humiliate and abuse some local transgender individuals they found on the streets.
So what if some of the African women and the transgendered locals were sex workers? (It does not matter to me whether they were or were not, because I believe that sex workers, like all other kinds of workers, are just as entitled to dignity as anyone else). Does the mere suspicion that some people may be sex workers entitle a group of aam aadmis to manhandle and humiliate them, or any one else who they think fits the description of what they think is a sex worker way past midnight on the streets. Is the moral fibre of anti-corruption crusaders so fragile as to require strengthening through the enactment of sadistic rituals on the bodies of convenient others ? Can it be accidental that such ‘others’ just happen to be racial and sexual minorities ?
Perhaps this is what Rabindranath Tagore had in mind when he invoked ‘the savage greed of the civilized’ in his poem ‘Africa’. Now that Africa has been called out in the streets of Delhi, we need to recognize the heart of darkness that lurks within this city. This is the darkness of racial prejudice, that every ‘North Eastern’, Burmese and African inhabitant of Delhi knows well, it is the stain of bigotry that every Afghan or Kashmiri Muslim young man or woman faces when looking for a house to rent, it is the slur, the snide remark, that shadows every trans or queer person. This is the real face of the so called ‘moral code’ that Somnath Bharti and his vigilantes are trying to force down our throats. This is why, unless something is done to prevent it now, AAP (Aam Aadmi Party) will rapidly turn into KHAP (Khas Aadmi Party).
Following the recent regrettable rape of a Danish tourist in Central Delhi, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had made a statement that linked sexual crime in the city to drugs and prostitution. As we know well by now, sexual assault takes place everywhere—from the confines of families and in the home, in schools, ashrams, army encampments and during festivals that claim to celebrate debate and intellectual activity. In fact, the statistical incidence of sexual assault within the ordinary middle class Indian family home is far greater than in drug-dens, allegedly run by African emigrants. And if the consumption of drugs can, in certain instances, be factors behind cases of sexual assault, so too can an overdoes of traditional family values, organized religion and even (as in the Tehelka episode) the right degree of glamorously liberal angst.
Curiously, these facts do not embolden Delhi’s Law Minister and his posse of vigilantes to raid homes in Malviya Nagar and Saket, (neighborhoods adjacent to Khirki village), the offices of major media houses, or temples and places of worship, or to obtain urine samples under duress from young Indian women and to berate policemen for standing by (for once, and for a change) the rights of people to be protected from undue harassment.
Like all racism, Bharti’s prejudice conceals at its heart, a repressed sexual secret—a shameful projection of anxieties about rape on to the bodies of racial others. Racist lynch mobs in the American South were often motivated by a wave of self-righteous rage about transgressions of sexual boundaries and rumors about rape (of white women by black men). In a curious twist of fate, the lynch mob that Somnath Bharti leads and Arvind Kejriwal endorses seems to seek recompense for the rape of a white and brown woman in Delhi by enacting the humiliation of black women, who have nothing to do with the attacks on any woman, anywhere in the city. If that is not racism, then I do not know what is. It is racism, and it is misogyny. I do not know what can be worse than this combination of prejudices.
Many young people from the arts communities, especially young women who live and/or work in Khirki village, and have to walk through its streets on the way to or from work have always told me that they feel safe in Khirki because of the very public presence of young African women, even late into the night. If some residents of Khirki and Malviya Nagar feel threatened by the African presence in their midst, equally there are some who actually feel reassured and comforted by that very presence. If anything, it is the solidarity that many in Khirki feel with its African inhabitants that is more in keeping with this city’s long history.
Somnath Bharti, has violated a long history that Delhi has of being hospitable to people from all parts of the world. By his actions he has demonstrated that it is not the Africans of Khirki, but he and his gang that do not really belong to the city and its traditions. There were African inhabitants in Delhi as long ago as in the 13th Century, and many of them may well have lived where Khirki village stands today. Razia Sultan, who reigned as Delhi’s queen from 1236 to 1240, and whose citadel was very close to Khirki, is rightly remembered with great fondness as one of the few just and compassionate rulers that this city has had in its long history. Raziya had an African consort, Jamal-ud-Din Yaqut, and she fought to protect the dignity of this man, whom she loved (it is rumored that she loved him and another female companion, both of whom had once been slaves) from the racial and sexual prejudices of her courtiers. In the popular imagination Raziya Sultan lost her throne, and her life, because she did not choose to abandon those she loved, regardless of their race, gender or sexual orientation, and that is what marks her out as one of the many heroes and martyrs of Delhi.
A few centuries later, we hear of Sidi Miftah, a Habshi (Abyssinian) noble man also known as Habsh (Dark) Khan in the service of Shahjahan, who later in life turned into a majzoob, (a passionate Sufi mystic) and whose memory is immortalized in the Phatak Habsh Khan, situated near Tilak Bazar, Fatehpuri, in the old city. There is even a Siddiyon Ka Masjid (an African mosque) near Filmistan Cinema, just off Karol Bagh. All of these facts are traces of the long African history of Delhi and if we have to find a ethical anchor for this city’s life, which has to be based on inclusivity, hospitality, cosmopolitanism and openness, I would much rather that we find it in the parable of Raziya Sultan’s love for an African man and in the passion of Sidi Miftah than in the moral cancer of Somnath Bharti’s xenophobic and sexist vigilantism.
Thankfully, many people in Delhi have a better sense of its traditions and history of hospitality than Somnath Bharti and his gang. Several young people, artists, performers, teachers, student activists of AISA from JNU, Delhi University and Jamia Millia Islamia, and women active with the AIPWA and other organizations and individuals came together yesterday at Jantar Mantar to protest against the racist attack in Khirki village. Also present were a few of the African citizens of Delhi. Kavita Krishnan, general secretary of the AIPWA, began the meeting by speaking out how racism and sexism feed off each other.
Aastha Chauhan, a young artist and cultural organizer who has been working in Khirki village for quite some time now, spoke of how over the past year of so, there had been several attempts by her and her friends (both African and Indian) to counter the racism and misogyny that had become a hallmark of daily life in Khirki and its vicinity. She spoke of how they had made several representations to the local police to take measures that ensures that young women and children of African descent could feel safe in their homes and on the streets in Khirki. She had talked about how their efforts were made in an attempt to counter a series of complaints from the local RWA members that listed the ‘African menace’ as consisting of the following—the fact that they played music, that their women wear shorts and baniyaan, (which, they said, might provoke ‘our’ daughters into wanting to start wearing shorts) that their food smells awful, that they smoke marijuana, that they are prostitutes (for which they had no evidence, barring a ‘sting’ by a local TV channel) , and that they have live-in partners, which is contrary to Indian culture.
Aastha spoke of how her efforts had actually begun bearing some fruit when a sympathetic police officer in the local thana had actually decided to pursue an even handed course which, while it was sensitive to routine ‘law & order’ concerns, was not attentive to complaints against Africans that were based entirely on prejudices about life style and private conduct that had no bearing in law. It is this ‘neglect’ of prejudice that is now being touted as complicity with corruption by the Aam Aadmi Party and its leadership. She urged everyone present to being confronting racism in every small detail—to stand up to it in shops, when an African customer is insulted, on the streets and in work places.
After Aastha, Jason a young African man, asserted that the world, according to him is the home of all of humanity. And any human being should accordingly have the right to feel at home, anywhere in the world. He spoke of how Indians were accorded great respect in his native country, and he said that naturally, he expected that respect to be reciprocated in India. He said he was attracted to the idea of living here by what he saw in Indian films, and had a great love for Indian people and for the country, which was why he was at a loss to understand why some Indian people were so unwelcoming to him and others like him. He thanked the people who had come out in support of the African residents of Delhi and blessed them for their solidarity.
This was followed by two rounds of drumming by another young African person, and a brief burst of impromptu dancing and then more statements by other students, artists and activists.
If, as has been alleged, Somnath Bharti said that these people—meaning Africans—are ‘not like us’ or something to that effect, then he seems to have stumbled upon that a sudden realization that he and his followers are actually members of a species other than human. As far as human beings are concerned, it is a fact that ultimately we are all from Africa because that is where our common ancestors found their humanity. Our species became human in Africa, and that makes Africans of us all, regardless of where in Delhi, or in the world, we choose to anchor ourselves and our histories.
Except, perhaps for some aam aadmi in the city of Delhi who stumbled upon their aadmiyat (manhood) exactly at the point when they also lost their insaniyat (humanity). Unfortunately for Somnath Bharti and Arvind Kejriwal, that is not a process that can ordinarily be described as evolution.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
India is acountry of full of myths and is run around myths.One of them is Hindus are peace loving and all others are not.This explains why police hardly take any action against Hindu mobs who kill Muslims and Christians,rape theri women and burn their children.Rascism is built in societies through such myths as the aggressors are shown as aggreived ones.A deep sinister plot is hatched and assiduously followed for generations.
Besides blacks are looked down as uncivilized always in India.Norhtheners in India has similar notions about Southerners who are darker in complexion.One good example the way the TamilNadu people were portrayed in Chennai Express.
Racism exists in India and unless it is addressed honestly,injustices will galore.
> "When Arvind Kejriwal, makes the mistake of trying to defend Somnath Bharti, denying all charges of racism (just as Narendra Modi denies all charges of communalism) he is exposing himself either as a liar (who knows what racism is but is in denial about it) or as a man of very limited political intelligence (who, like most racists, does not understand what racism is when he is confronted with it)."
The phrase "limited political intelligence" may assume more significance as we go on. Although I hope not! And Modi of course has become the epitome of hypocritical deniers of vicious communalism.
Looks like the female organisations are more powerful than AAP, BJP and Congress combined.
The antimale media is hyper reporting their 'protests' as usual, deliberately ignoring the protests of the common man,
How to write like a Marxist.
"Like all racism, ...... a repressed sexual secret—a shameful projection of anxieties about rape on to the bodies of racial others. In a curious twist of fate, the lynch mob ........... seems to seek recompense for the rape of a white and brown woman in Delhi by enacting the humiliation of black women."
Thus, one can draw a force diagram. Whites metaphorically screw browns in Amreeka, so browns physically screw whites in Dilli. Guilty at violating whites, browns metaphorically ejaculate their fear into blacks, faithfully imitating their Masters in the American South.
I am surprised that this writer has a prejudice against darkness. See how he rants against "the heart of darkness in this city". Poor darkness had nothing to do with it. It follows brightness as night follows day! Of course such phrases have come to these columnists from White men like Joseph Conrad. Remember "Africa, the dark continent' ?
I tell you what the heart of the matter is with such writers. They get their ideas, thier phrases and their words from long-dead Europeans and eccentric failed ideologues like Che Guevara. They do not have a single original thought of their own.
In all these attacks by AAP and its supporters on Nigerian and Ugandan prostitutes and their pimps miss on one major point. These prostitutes don't put gun on any Delhites' head and force them to become their clients. AAP has rein of Delhi and (hopefully) high moral pedestall. They should use their power of persuasion to keep Delhites away from these prostitutes and the prostitutes will just go away.
By the way, Ram Lala, it is a strong requirement of Outlook that any article by any author has to include attack on Narendra Modi. Then and then the article would be considered for the publication.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT