Away from the breathless excitement and nail-biting tension of the India-Pakistan semi-final match, the mood inside the Long Room at the Mohali cricket ground was remarkably different—warm, poetic and contemplative. An encounter of another kind was afoot here, a meeting over dinner between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart, Yousuf Raza Gilani. Flanked by Congress president Sonia Gandhi and her son, Rahul, Manmohan Singh recited an Urdu couplet to welcome Gilani and his entourage. It set the mood for the two sides to partake of the lavish spread—and for informal parleys. Gilani too responded with a couplet and profusely thanked the Indian PM for hosting him as also creating the opportunity for the two countries to interact at the highest political level.
Manmohan spoke extempore at the dinner. A senior Indian official present at the meeting told Outlook, “He spoke straight from the heart, but it wasn’t all emotion.” He acknowledged the many difficulties in establishing normal and cordial relations, but stressed that this goal both India and Pakistan “owed to themselves and their people”. Striking a protagonistic vein, he said it was for the leaders to take the initiative to improve ties, instead of waiting for outsiders to nudge them towards it. Gilani, in turn, emphasised his country’s commitment to have good relations with India and hoped that all outstanding issues between them would be resolved through the dialogue process agreed upon in Thimphu, where the foreign secretaries had met on the sidelines of SAARC.
It could well be said that March 30 was a day of triumph both for cricket and diplomacy, the two often consciously brought together from the time of Jawaharlal Nehru. These attempts in the past have, at best, resulted in temporary improvement in Indo-Pak relations, so is Manmohan’s invitation to Gilani any different? “Each such invitation is different because the context is always different,” says Congress MP Shashi Tharoor. “Coming after two-and-a-half years of suspended dialogue following 26/11, this invitation is particularly significant. It accelerates a process of normalisation that the Indian government had for a while been reluctant to commence.”
Before Mohali, mandarins in the foreign office had understood the need to give a political push to the decision for resuming the Indo-Pak dialogue process. Yet there was a catch—Manmohan couldn’t travel to Islamabad, or invite Gilani to New Delhi for a summit meet unless there were concrete achievements to flaunt, particularly on the issue of terrorism. Worse, the volatile public mood post-26/11 precluded the possibility of registering a breakthrough in Indo-Pak ties. The semi-final, therefore, became an alibi for the two PMs to meet officially and take a step forward to normalise relations.
Equally surprised were the Pakistanis, who couldn’t have turned down Manmohan’s invitation as it would have showed the country in a poor light and portrayed its leaders as cussed. Islamabad communicated the decision to Gilani, who was on an official trip to Samarkand in Uzbekistan, and once he expressed his willingness to travel to India (after his return), his acceptance was formally transmitted to New Delhi.
Manmohan’s cricket diplomacy had elements of a subcontinental batsman’s deft touch. Pilloried in the media on the issue of corruption, he exploited the excitement preceding the match to bag for himself, quite unexpectedly, some favourable news coverage. For a good many days, people were speculating on the outcome of it all, wondering about its efficacy and perhaps a tad apprehensive about the reactions. In the end, though, Manmohan’s political instincts were proved right—there were loud cheers from the Mohali crowd for the Pakistani national anthem, indicating that at least at a popular level there still remains a lot of goodwill for that country.
“I see it as a very welcome gesture,” says author Urvashi Butalia, who has close contacts with people across the border and has written a book on the trauma of Partition. “There is nationalism when India and Pakistan play but this time it was not that high as everybody wanted to see a good match.” Butalia feels such gestures will help strengthen people-to-people contact, paving the way for regular and frequent travels across the border. Agrees journalist Kumar Ketkar, “Any opportunity for India and Pakistan to come together should always be taken. Cricket is a religion common to both countries. It not only brings the two nations closer but also helps in healing existing wounds and releasing tensions.”
We are family.. A banner seen at the Mohali semi-final match. (Photograph by Biplab Banerjee/Asian Age)
Such sentiments, obviously, aren’t shared by the Indian intelligence agencies. At least two journalists who came from Pakistan to cover the match were evicted from their hotel rooms once their nationalities became known. Hotels were under pressure from police to refuse accommodation to visiting Pakistani scribes. One of them, Zahid Malik, told Outlook, “What’s the use of making all these announcements at the level of the prime ministers if at the ground level this is what the officials do?” Another Pakistani journalist spoke about his harassment at the hands of an Indian intelligence agency whose officials barged into his hotel room and grilled him for over 30 minutes with “aggressive questions” on why he was in India.
Amidst the horror stories there were also redeeming ones. Like the retired army officer who gave journalist Ehsan Qureshi a room in his house after the latter couldn’t find a place in any of the city hotels. The officer had been wounded in Kashmir during the 1965 war against Pakistan. Says Qureshi, “He treated me like a brother, let me stay in his house and was willing to invite any other Pakistani journalist who didn’t have a place to stay.”
Much will obviously depend on the prime minister’s ability to consolidate the gains accruing from this impromptu ‘peace’. Says a senior Indian diplomat, “It is the PM’s personal conviction and deeply held faith that India and Pakistan can live peacefully and lead a normal relationship like many other neighbours.” Yet Manmohan’s ability to translate his conviction into reality is dependent on two factors. For one, can his government, beset by corruption charges, focus on the complicated elements of Indo-Pak relations? Political analyst Mahesh Rangarajan says Opposition leaders, including BJP leader L.K. Advani, have felt compelled to welcome the cricket diplomacy, albeit cautiously. “But we will go back to dal-roti politics from Saturday, after the finals in Mumbai,” Rangarajan adds.
The second factor is Pakistan’s behaviour. Should India witness a terror incident, the Mohali spirit would likely melt overnight. Sources fear such an attack could occur in Afghanistan, where voice intercepts suggest an ISI conspiracy to yet again target the Indian mission in Kabul. For the moment, the Mohali spirit has buoyed Indian officials who seem affected by the PM’s optimism. But they have their feet grounded. As one of them said, “It is said that God took seven days to create the world. It doesn’t need second-guessing to say it will take much longer to mend India-Pakistan relations.” Diplomacy, even that inspired by cricket, we all know, can’t be a one-day affair.
By Pranay Sharma in Delhi, with Rohit Mahajan in Chandigarh
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
I had already regretted
>> @DINESH - Cricket deplomacy is a good thing that took place, in recent years, between India and Pakistan relationship. It is evident in the statements made by Pakistani cricket captain after team's return at their home.
Please don't be so naive. The Pakistani cricket captain gave a praising statement about India. There is no change of heart. After a wwek, his real feelings came out.
Look athis ...
>> "In my opinion, if I have to tell the truth, they (Indians) will never have hearts like Muslims and Pakistanis. I don't think they have the large and clean hearts that Allah has given us,
>> It is a very difficult thing for us to live with them (Indians) or to have long-term relationship with them. Nothing will come out of talks.
He did not mean Indians as paraphrased by TOI. He meant Hindus. They want to drag religion into every thing. Look at what he says: they won't have hearts like Muslims and Pakistanis. So in that content, only Hindus of India are left.
At first, he had few good words about Indians. He thought if plays nice card with Indian media, Pakis can get into IPL amd make millions. When it did not work, he went back to Hate card.
I don't know when our idiotic PMs will keep falling for this BS of Pukes. Vajpayee was like this. MMS is like this. IK Gujral was like this. Only Indira Gandhi, PVNR were smart enough to know the real nature of Pukes. Why can't we learn from history? Or is it a strategy of Indian PMs to keep Pukes in good humour through such gestures. But the SCUM Pakis never changed and will never change.
Donot be overjoy.Priminister Gilani is puppet of Army of Pakistan.Relation betwwen India and Pakistan will in hand of army.Army donot want any settlement between two countries.Bread and butter of army depend on hate of India. If both countries make comprase what can Pakistan`s army do?
I regret for my comment on cricket deplomacy after reading in Times of India what Afridi had said about Indians.
Cricket deplomacy is a good thing that took place, in recent years, between India and Pakistan relationship. It is evident in the statements made by Pakistani cricket captain after team's return at their home. But UPA especially MMS and SoniaG have lost all the faith in people's heart. Indian public now puts them in the place of corrupts, immorals, liars and traitors etc, etc. Now it is definite, every deal they made be it relating to purchase of weapons, fighter aircrafts, nuclear power plants, incrase in FDI limit were signed after taking bribe. And all these deals facilitate them to accept bribe in foreign countries. No hawala. Even this cricket diplomacy is suspected as an act to woo the muslim voters in 5 states that are going in to poll.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT