As Assam DGP K. Harishkeshan took the line that "there is sufficient evidence to prove that Tata Tea is funding militants in the state", senior Tata Tea officials were put through the wringer. Its outgoing managing director R.K. Krishna Kumar and Mumbai-based official K. Sridhar secured anticipatory bail in Mumbai, but two other senior officers—executive director S.K. Kidwai and general manager S. Dogra—were grilled in marathon sessions in Guwahati. They were quizzed about the involvement of the company in financing and abetting ULFA militants.
The nexus was unearthed following the arrest of Pranati Deka, the outfit's cultural secretary, in Mumbai, along with two other members on August 23. Documents recovered from their possession apparently reveal that the tea company had not only picked up her maternity bills in Mumbai's Jaslok Hospital, but also paid for her two-way air passage twice this year. According to the DGP, the total expenses borne by the tea giant "run into lakhs."
Deka, member of ULFA's central committee, the outfit's highest decision-making body, is the wife of Chitraban Hazarika, who is the finance secretary of the organisation. She and two escorts, Kamal Baruah and Phanindra Medhi, have been brought to Guwahati and remanded to judicial custody. Deka's less-than-a-month-old baby has been handed over to a relative.
The police has now launched a search for Brajen Gogoi, Tata Tea's manager, community development and social welfare, who apparently escorted Deka to Mumbai. The police claims it has seized letters written by one of Tata Tea's Mumbai-based officers to the Jaslok authorities as to why Deka was not provided with an A-class cabin as sought.
Gogoi is believed to be somewhere in the United States and the state government might approach the CBI so that it can get in touch with Interpol and trace him. Gogoi is said to have also accompanied top ULFA leaders to Switzerland for a meeting of the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples' Organisations—a trip funded by Tata Tea. Another damaging charge is that it recently made a huge payment in foreign currency to the banned outfit in London.
Shaken by the revelations, Tata Tea has come up with a rather vague defence. In a note issued from its Calcutta headquarters, the company said members of the banned outfit may have availed of medical treatment under its welfare scheme. But it did not specifically rebut the charges of picking the tab for the two-way air fare of the ULFA members. The press note issued by the company's executive director, Kidwai, said: "The company pays money directly to the hospitals for actual treatment of the patients under the scheme and it does not pay any amount directly to beneficiaries. Some persons apparently belonging to the ULFA have apparently availed of this scheme. " The police is not buying this argument. "How does the company explain the payments for air travel and the fact that one of its senior officers accompanied the ULFA members to Mumbai?" asks a senior police officer.
Although reports that tea companies siphon off funds to militant groups as protection money have always made the rounds, there has never been any proof. Since the early '90s when the ULFA made its presence felt for the first time, and the Bodo militancy also gathered steam, the Rs 2,000-crore Assam tea industry has been at the receiving end. At least a dozen managers and senior planters have been killed over the last seven years and several others have been kidnapped and then released for undisclosed ransom amounts. The most prominent of the killings took place in June 1990 when Surendra Paul, owner of the Apeejay group and brother of UK-based Swraj Paul, was gunned down by the ULFA in Upper Assam. Paul's killing and a spate of kidnappings over the next few years was enough to send the over-a-century-old tea industry scurrying for cover.
The industry stepped up its 'social welfare' activities to counter the propaganda that it does very little for the state and also persuaded the government to set up a security force exclusively for vulnerable tea gardens. The Assam branch of the Indian Tea Association (ITA), an influential tea body, has spent at least Rs 6 crore on various welfare measures since 1989. Individual tea companies like Williamson Magor and even Tata Tea have also stepped up their welfare activities. Williamson Magor, for instance, has instituted a literary award carrying Rs 1 lakh in cash and a citation. Besides, it has set up a football academy to train budding players. Tata Tea has set up a Rs 7-crore referral hospital and has recently commissioned a vocational training centre at Rowta, deep inside the Bodo-dominated area. The change in the tea industry's attitude came after an ITA-commissioned survey conducted by IMRB in the early '90s which revealed, among other things, the following points:
AWARE of the threats to its senior managers and planters, the ITA funded the Assam Tea Plantation Security Force. Drawn from the existing battalions of home guards, 2,000 personnel of this force are deployed in 80 gardens. But with 850 gardens spread across the state, the force strength is hardly sufficient. Hence, as a senior planter said on condition of anonymity: "There is no other way but to 'buy peace' with the militants." While the general reaction in tea circles is of shock, many seasoned executives are not surprised that Tata Tea took the route of "funding" militants. "With 19 of its 46 major gardens in Assam and an annual production of 25 million kg, Tata perhaps took the easy way out," says a tea veteran. Tata may not acknowledge paying off militants but another company, Goodricke, showed a large amount as 'ransom payment' in one of its annual reports.
The other tea major, Williamson Magor, is also said to be under scrutiny following the recovery of audited account books of another banned outfit, the National Democratic Front of Bodoland, earlier known as the Bodo Security Force. The books reveal that Magor had paid huge sums to the Bodo out-fit. Magor has not reacted to the allegation. Most companies toe Tata Tea's line since it offers them a respite from the militants.
But Assam chief secretary V.S. Jaffa is not convinced. "Whosoever abets or aids in waging a war, whether an editor (referring to Ajit Bhuyan, editor of an Assamese daily arrested recently for alleged links to the ULFA and the Sanjoy Ghose murder) who does it with his pen or an industrialist who does it with his money should be dealt with equal severity." Strong words, signalling the state government's relief in having found someone else to blame.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT