Indian cricket has hit a trough; the men of steel are in steep, embarrassing decline, the boys who come in their wake are callow yet. Fans are lamenting and switching off their TVs. Just over two years after becoming the No. 1 Test team, the dream has soured. India have now lost seven Tests in a row away from home, in England and Australia. It stings like a scorpion bite—is it death?
Perhaps we’d still not be too bad at home—wolves if not lions. As England slumped to 192 in their first innings against Pakistan in Dubai, it comforted some in India. Isn’t every Test team fallible away from home? But while India has lost abroad before, the difference is that even in the worst of times, India didn’t seem like the “minnow” it does now. So here are ten ways in which India can revive Test cricket and improve its performance abroad.
Player earnings in 2011
Pitches: Make lively pitches for domestic cricket so that players can bat well overseas. We need hard and bouncy wickets, wickets with grass, wickets which help bowlers—the kind we got in England in July-August and in Australia now. “We’d get used to playing in those conditions if we start keeping our wickets uncovered in domestic cricket,” says Sarkar Talwar, former Haryana spinner. “There was some talk of implementing this, but it wasn’t done.”
Talwar says that technically incorrect batsmen will never survive on such tracks. In the current Ranji Trophy, an astounding 154 centuries and 345 half-centuries have been scored before the final. In the Ranji Trophy league phase alone, 92 batsmen scored centuries, but only 16 bowlers took over 20 wickets. But this mountain of runs is largely irrelevant if you can’t provide batsmen and bowlers with technique to win abroad. Pitches are the first step—and Indian cricket has refused to take it for decades. It’s now or never.
“IPL has people who are hired to speak good of it...it’s poison for cricket. Supporting it for money is like selling cocaine for a living.”Tarak Sinha, Coach, who worked with the Rajastahan Cricket Association Succession plan: Our top batsmen are at the end of their tether all at once, which means a massive hole in the team when they go. The batsmen are rightly being criticised for their failures, but someone else deserves greater blame for not planning for transition. About the Indian selectors, Ian Chappell, former Australian captain, says, “They thought, ‘We’re not going to worry about the mess we’re going to leave.’ The fact is that the Indian selectors were not prepared, and now they’re paying the price.” Former Test player and commentator Sanjay Manjrekar says, “There’s no other way, you have to get young players in. Sure, Yuvraj and Raina looked out of place in England, but perhaps we gave the wrong youth opportunity in Test cricket. Were we influenced by their odi performance?”
Top players in Ranji Trophy: Ranji Trophy would become more competitive if our best players are there. But in 23 years since his first class debut, Tendulkar has played only 33 Ranji matches. Anil Kumble has never ever bowled to him in a domestic match. In 15 seasons of first-class cricket, Harbhajan Singh has played only 29 Ranji Trophy matches. How is the mountain of runs going to be judged if the best cricketers of the land aren’t playing?
Home improvements: The domestic first-class competitions are sinking into oblivion and need to be cared for. Take scheduling, for instance. As Aakash Chopra notes in his new book, Out of Blue, “What’s the point of having the domestic T20 tournament in October when you have to prepare for the longer format? Why have the T20 tournament, then the Ranji Trophy group stage, then the final stage of the T20 tournament just around the IPL?”
Another change that must be made is to make teams go for a victory. You get five points for an outright victory, three if you take the first innings lead. “The difference is just two points, and taking wickets isn’t easy, so most often teams are satisfied with the first innings lead and this defensive mindset is ingrained in our players,” says Talwar.
Reward good show in Ranji: From the eight teams in this year’s Ranji Trophy, numbering some 120 players, only four players have a central BCCI contract—all four from Tamil Nadu. The best players of the domestic circuit need to be groomed for the future, and the centrepiece to this should be A team tours to the most challenging venues—Australia, England and South Africa. Excellence in domestic cricket should be recognised—if an Ashok Dinda is the top wicket-taker, he should be given a chance.
Promote Tests: England markets Test cricket with carnivals at city centres, contests and coaching clinics to lure the young. India is aggressively marketing Twenty20 cricket, but not Test matches. Crowds still flock into the seven traditional Test centres. So why hold a Test in Nagpur, 18 km outside the city, and then sell only the season tickets? Only by reviving interest in Tests can you get the young to value the long-format game.
Regulate T20: It’s anti-Test cricket. It could be exciting, though repetitive, to watch, but it hurts technique. Coaches—the ones who’re not on the make—believe juniors shouldn’t play T20s at all. Punjab plans to ban it for Under-21 players. “All states must do the same,” says Tarak Sinha, the respected Delhi coach, who has worked with the Rajasthan Cricket Association.
Curtail IPL: The IPL this year would see 75 matches over 54 days. That’s clearly an excess, hurtful to India’s Test hopes. “Even our great batsmen are technically weaker because of it,” Sinha says. “Young players are chasing IPL contracts rather than working on their technique.” He says the former cricketers who are defending the IPL now are doing it because they’ve been “bought”. “IPL has people who are hired to speak good of it,” he says. “It’s poison for cricket.... Supporting it for money is like selling cocaine to make a living.” He suggests curtailing IPL’s duration, and making playing for India and in the Ranji Trophy more financially lucrative than the IPL. “Else the future is dark,” he predicts.
Empower India coach: When he coached England, current Indian coach Duncan Fletcher conceptualised the central contract system, wherein country came before county. Thus Andy Flower, the England coach, can withhold players from domestic cricket if he thinks it’s in the national team’s interest. England have too much T20 at the domestic level, but a player like Graeme Swann plays around eight matches a year, including the ones for England, because the interests of the country come first, not that of Nottinghamshire. Fletcher needs to be given the freedom to implement this in India.
“Defenders of IPL cite David Warner as a T20 player who’s done well in Test cricket,” says Sinha. “But in Australia, each team plays just seven T20 games, and the money isn’t obscene (Big Bash has a total team salary cap of $1 million, which Bill Hilfenhaus alone gets in IPL). Test cricket is still more important for them.”
End conflict of interest in BCCI: The previous three changes could occur only if the BCCI thinks of India first, and that is possible only if no board official stands to gain from the IPL. In gentler and more innocent times, BCCI had a clause that said “no administrator shall have, directly or indirectly, any commercial interest in the matches or events conducted by the Board”. This was changed in 2008, making conflict of interest institutional in the BCCI. The most blatant case is that of BCCI president N. Srinivasan owning an IPL team, K. Srikkanth being a national selector and brand ambassador of Chennai Superkings, and Anil Kumble being KSCA president, Royal Challengers Bangalore mentor and heading a player agent company. Now the selectors are paid salaries, in an attempt to professionalise the system. Says Bishen Singh Bedi, “But professionalism is an attitude, they can’t simply become professional just because they’re paid. Dravid and Laxman have done magnificent service for India. What have the administrators done? Why are they sticking to honorary positions for donkey’s years, without accountability?”
Australia has taken giant strides on the road to redemption in Test cricket after swiftly accepting the recommendations of an extensive review. India needs something similar, and quickly.
Web version edited on Jan 25, 2012 to fix Mr Tarak Sinha's designation which had been wrongly mentioned in print.
Apropos The Devil Betwixt Bat & Pad (Jan 30), the BCCI should use its financial clout to decree that the BCCI XI (the so-called Indian cricket team) shall be automatically declared a Test win up over the opposition before a series even begins. It’s our only hope. That way, at least the BCCI XI will never be “whitewashed”.
Biswapriya Purkayastha, Shillong
Of your 10 ways to improve cricket, only one—the “succession plan”—is likely to be implemented. That too on soft targets like V.V.S. Laxman.
Krishna Pavan, Vijayawada
Rubbish article on Sachin. I am surprised at Outlook.
G.M. Gulati, Adipur
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Best of all: let the BCCI use its financial clout to decree that the BCCI XI (the so-called Indian cricket team) shall be automatically declared to be a test win up over the opposition before the series even begins. In limited-over tournaments, the BCCI XI shall be put stright into the finals while the other teams slog it out to qualify. That way the BCCI XI will never be whitewashed and it will also always be at least Number Two and everyone's happy.
(Note: I despise cricket. Personally, while the above is satire, I hope Indian cricket continues sliding to the lower depths so that real sports finally get the chance to shine.)
The goal of any team game should be the achievement of team objectives rather than building up records in the Guinness book!
9 out of the TEN ways, mentioned, cannot be implemented unless there are "THE HEADS" in BCCI who are concerned more about money than Cricket.Only one way, "Succession Plan", can be expected to be implemented, that too on soft targets like Laxman.
Krishna Pavan, Vijayawada, India.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT