Shailendra Gaikwad: Owns the Rendezvous group of hotels Sanjay Gaikwad: MD of UFO Moviez
Vivek Venugopal: of Elite Group of Kerala
Dilip Mehta: Rosy Blue Diamonds, a big jewellery outfit
Mehul Patel: of Anchor Earth, electrical goods manufacturer
Mukesh Patel: of ship-breaking company Shri Ram Vessels
Anand Shah Real estate mogul
When the Indian Premier League went casting its line, looking for 9th and 10th cities to retail its annual fare of tamasha cricket, Kochi heeded the call with a stupendous cheque of $333.33 million (Rs 1,500 crore). Everyone was surprised. Kochi in Kerala, after all, isn’t writ large on the sports consciousness as a cricketing city; most IPL teams are believed to be in the red in the third year of their operations, even though they were bought at much lower prices. Is it really a viable investment for the buyers of the Kochi IPL franchise?
But Kerala abounds with contradictions that clamour for attention—a bastion of the Left, which is currently in power, it is also said to be India’s No. 1 consumer state. It’s full of lavish spenders of money, desperately seeking housing; the urban-rural divide doesn’t exist, it’s an integrated market, a marketing man’s dream. With only 3.7 per cent of the Indian population, Kerala accounts for 12 per cent of the Indian consumer market, fuelled by steady remittances from its Gulf expats.
At an annual orgy before the god of consumerism, Kerala treats money like the abundant water it’s been blessed with. In the recent Grand Kerala Shopping Festival, for instance, economists estimate shoppers spent over Rs 1,000 crore in 45 days in December-January—this despite the state supposedly reeling under the ripple effects of the economic bust-up in Dubai. A second-tier city ranking below the metros, Kochi, the commercial capital of the state, also faces an acute housing shortfall despite a spurt in construction. A report prepared by the Confederation of Indian Industry and Institute for Competitiveness states that Kochi ranks among cities with the worst house-cost and availability parameters. A housing boom beckons.
There is a clear link between this and the IPL acquisition. Four partners of the Rendezvous consortium—buyers of the Kochi IPL franchise—have interest in the real estate market and one, Rosy Blue Diamond, is eyeing the Kerala market, which seems to have an unquenchable thirst for jewellery.
Cricket aficionados watch Sreesanth at the IPL in a TV showroom in Kochi
They like cricket too, actually. It is the No. 2 sport in the state after football, and when Malayalam movie superstar Mohanlal pulled out of the bidding to buy an IPL team earlier in March, there was widespread disappointment, soon replaced by elation that Kochi would have an IPL team, after all. It’s a matter of great pride—many people Outlook talked with were full of it. They mentioned Kochi boy S. Sreesanth as a potential No. 1 fast bowler of India, they recalled Tinu Yohannan as the first Kerala player to represent India; they also claimed partial proprietary rights on players with Kerala connections in other state teams like Robin Uthappa and Abhishek Nayar, and former India bowler Abey Kuruvilla. “Tamil Nadu has a team, Karnataka has a team in the IPL,” say MBA-hopefuls Sharath and Pavitra. “Now we too have one, we too have something to cheer for.”
“It’s recognition of Kochi as the economic capital of Kerala,” says Kochi-based economist Ajit Kumar. “The average Malayali is a very emotional and competitive person, and it satisfies his ego to have a team in the IPL.” He also mentions a more compelling reason for the presence of the IPL in Kochi—fiscal fluidity and demand for housing. “I’ve estimated that by the end of the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-2012), there would be a demand for 1,20,000 housing units in Kochi alone,” he says. “At present, 50,000 units are available—the shortfall is massive, and that’s why so many builders are among the Kochi owners.” They want to build a brand through the IPL and lure customers to future housing projects.
One of the owners is Vivek Venugopal of the Elite Group of Thrissur, which has interests in the food and construction industry. Venugopal—the only Malayali co-owner of the team—told Outlook that all team owners of the Kochi franchise are friends, and that the idea of owning an IPL team was born last year. “Initially at the bidding, we didn’t come forward because the preconditions were daunting,” he said. “Later, when the preconditions were changed (removal of the clause requiring the potential franchisee to demonstrate a net worth of $1 billion, and requiring the winning bidder to pay an advance guarantee of $100 million), we decided to bid for Kochi, on the advice of Union minister Shashi Tharoor.”
The marketing opportunities Kerala presented was the motive for the co-owners. “Kerala has great potential for us because it’s a small, literate, high-density state, the fan base is integrated and easily accessible, there’s a strong, significant nri influence, and there exist strong entertainment possibilities,” says Venugopal. “Kerala’s got a mammoth consumer market—all FMCG companies are here because it’s a huge market for them.”
Guiding spirit Shashi Tharoor in action at a friendly match in New Delhi
It’s still not clear whether cricket itself would rake in much money at the gates. The Kerala Cricket Association stadium won’t be ready before 2012; the Nehru Stadium, under renovation, has held one-dayers in the past before packed crowds. The IPL has assured Kochi of an alternate “home” stadium if their own venue isn’t ready by next year. Dr Kumar, once part of the Association, says even though IPL is not really serious cricket, initially there would be some following due to curiosity. “The stadium would be full, I think, for the first few games,” he says. “But I don’t expect much money from gate collection—during the one-day matches, from sell-out crowds, we could manage only Rs 65 lakh! The tickets can’t be priced high, do you think the very unions we have here would agree? No chance.” He says that, as a cricket administrator too, he does not see the economics of IPL working, unless rules are changed and more money is shared by the IPL from the TV rights; the notional gains, though, would accrue to the franchise owners, like brand-building and prestige. “And that’s the reason they’re here.”
Most people are confident that the city and the state would gain too. S.A. Manzoor of the Kerala Chamber of Commerce and Industry says the IPL would boost tourism and allied industries. “The ecosystem for that sort of an effect is already in place, and things can only improve,” he says.
Nothing’s wrong in the reduction of cricket into business, says award-winning Malayali and English writer K.L. Mohana Varma, who has written a novel on cricket. “W.G. Grace, when once dismissed early, batted on, telling the bowler, ‘people have come to watch me bat, not you bowl!’” Varma laughs. “From then on, organised cricket was not about people playing to enjoy—from a players’ game, it became a viewers’ game.” Varma, like so many others, believes IPL is not cricket but just a reality TV show. “But the viewer is happy,” he says, “which is better than getting happiness by getting drunk.”
Kerala, which had been parched under a partial spell of prohibition in the not-distant past, might get drunk on cricket next year on. At what cost to the game and consumer, there would be time enough in future to reckon.
So this is it—a hotelier-moviemaker from Maharashtra, a big diamond seller, an electrical goods manufacturer from Gujarat, a ship-breaker from Gujarat, a real estate moghul from Gujarat and a medium-scale hotelier from Kerala have acquired the Kerala ipl team. Big money will be generated, the lowest being from cricket (The Cochin Critters, Apr 5). Kochi will have added one more tumour, yet another source of disproportionate money supply, choked roads and non-existent water supply/waste disposal system. K.S.C. Nair, Indianapolis
I concede that locals are proud that Kerala finally has an ipl team. But, as a T20 sceptic, I ask if this is really cricket that is played in the ipl. As an Indian, I am embarrassed at the gargantuan amounts doled out by Sahara and Rendezvous Sports for their successful bids for the Pune and Kochi teams. Of course, this signifies business ventures, but the vulgarity of wealth on display—isn’t it a slap on the face of over 300 million poor people? Can someone please put a stop to all this unproductive money-making from the national time-waster that is instant cricket. Col R.D. Singh, Ambala Cantt
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT