PANDEMONIUM, predictably, was the fall-out in the assembly when Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu decided to do away with the state's 'dry law'. High-voltage drama prevailed in the Opposition benches. NTR's widow and TDP faction leader, Lakshmi Parvati, broke down. Fourteen members of the CPM—the ruling TDP's closest ally—were suspended. Walkouts were staged and marshals got into their act against trouble-makers. But the Bill—AP Prohibition Act, 1997—was passed. While 212 favoured it, the lone member left in the House to express his token protest was the Majlis Bachao Tehrik (MBT) leader, Mohammud Ama-nullah Khan. And Governor Krishan Kant consequently gave his assent to it.
As finance minister in N.T. Rama Rao's government, Naidu had argued along his leader's lines that total prohibition was a 'social commitment' and could not be measured in terms of revenue loss. When he took over the reins from NTR after the August 1995 crisis in the ruling TDP, Naidu had declared total prohibition, even withdrawing the health permits. He also amended the AP Prohibition Act, 1995, introduced by his predecessor in January that year.
Now Naidu is forced to backtrack as the state exchequer is deep in the red. The budgetary deficit this year is Rs 960 crore, 32.20 per cent of the annual budget outlay of Rs 2,980 crore, and the Reserve Bank has twice threatened to withdraw the overdraft facility. Prohibition Minister Nettem Raghuram admitted that his government had failed to implement the much-trumpeted policy effectively. "The government made earnest efforts and took a series of steps to enforce prohibition. Despite its best efforts, prohibition-related offences, particularly illicit distillation and smuggling, have been steadily increasing," he said.
More than a dozen TDP legislators, including the late Yerra Satyam from Mahabubnagar district, have been accused of patronising bootleggers in their respective constituencies. Complains P. Janardhana Reddy, Congress Legislature Party leader: "Naidu has shown no interest in disciplining his legislators. Instead, he allowed them a free hand. Even his brother, N. Ramamurthy Naidu, indulged in bootlegging to amass wealth in his native Chittoor district." Naidu, conceding the Opposition demand, has now ordered a probe against his brother for allegedly patronising smuggling of liquor. Says pro-prohibitionist Malladi Subbamma: "The government lacked sincerity in implementing total prohibition. This was evident from the reluctance of the authorities to book the ruling partymen."
The political interest in total prohibition had come about after women voters held an epoch-making agitation in Dubagunta, Nellore, during the regime of the then chief minister Kotla Vijayabhaskara Reddy, demanding a ban on all liquor. In a bid to bounce back to power, NTR incorporated the demand of the women—a stronghold of his party's votebank—in the TDP election manifesto. And consequently secured a massive mandate—224 of the 294 seats in the assembly. The expected revenue loss from 'total prohibition' was, at the time, put at a staggering Rs 600-700 crore.
The resultant financial crisis was not eased despite Naidu increasing taxes to the tune of Rs 2,500 crore, and raising the cost of subsidised rice (a vote-catching scheme that was very dear to NTR) to Rs 3.50. Then came the amendment to the Prohibition Act, allowing sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, to bring in Rs 1,000 crore as revenue to the exchequer annually. The modalities of implementing the new AP Prohibition Act, worked out by a Cabinet sub-committee, is based on the Delhi model. Some aspects:
Meanwhile, the Opposition continues to demand Naidu's scalp. Says Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy, a senior Congress MP: "Naidu has no moral right to continue in office, he has watered down all his party's electoral promises. Naidu has betrayed the people's confidence." And in Nellore, the birth place of the women's anti-arrack movement, there are reports of growing unrest.
To justify his government's decision, Naidu may have to score a point by taking up development activities such as power generation and establishing law and order in Naxalite areas. Despite accusations of deviating from NTR's ideals, this could turn out to be Naidu's chance to rid himself of the politics of populism and finally get on to the path of hard ground realities.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT