This year, he says, he personally knows of 17 homeless people who died in Delhi between January 1 and 22, but the figure could be upwards of 100. He explains the Crime Records Bureau figures for the same period show 394 unidentified dead bodies—many of them are homeless who just die off quietly in some corner, with no one to ask after them.
Last year, 11,000 Delhiites got voter ID cards which gave their address as “homeless”. Indu and other activists worked for three years to make this possible. This year they are hopeful of an even more dramatic approach to the problem of those without a home in a megapolis. On December 29, the day after Kejriwal was sworn in, Indu got a call from Manish Sisodia who also has charge of the urban development ministry in the Delhi government. Sisodia was saying that something had to be done for the homeless.
Then on the first morning of the new year, Kejriwal himself called and said “we have to do something quickly”. That afternoon Indu met Kejriwal and his colleagues at the Delhi Secretariat. Lots of plans were talked about, such as “immediately” setting up Portacabin shelters. One of the AAP ministers present asked, “We are not occupying the ministerial bungalows, why not house some of the homeless in them?”
Kejriwal would later give orders that Indu describes as simply “radical”. The new shelters should come up in the places where people sleep on pavements. The people must not be pushed out to other places by the police and administration, something that happened all the time during the reign of the Sheila Dikshit government.
But then nothing moves quickly in government, the AAP novices had to learn. As January draws to a close, the Portacabin shelters are still to be delivered. Still, in the first two weeks of the year, 50 extra plastic sheet shelters have come up across the city.
One of the more innovative ideas of the AAP regime was to use abandoned buses as shelters. Seven such buses were picked up by cranes and delivered to specific spots. Four stand outside the aiims hospital now, where patients and families look for any spot to curl up on cold nights. At 1.30 am, on January 21, when the Outlook team reached, the buses were packed with sleeping people.
At the heart of the concern for the city’s most unfortunate ones is Kejriwal’s own past as an activist. He has engaged with the issue of homelessness since 2000, has in fact even trained people on how to use RTI to get them their rights. Advocate and AAP core committee member Prashant Bhushan has been the lawyer in several significant cases dealing with this issue.
One can only speculate whether this sort of engagement also shapes Kejriwal’s attitude to the policemen on Delhi’s streets. For certainly it is the homeless and the urban poor in the slums who face the brunt of the anarchy of constant police harassment. For them, this is no orderly world.
Across the road, under a tree near the Hanuman mandir lives Pooja Sharma with her mother and brother. She is 23 now, but was married off at 14 in Agra. Her husband died, and she now survives under a plastic sheet near a busy Delhi road. Her two sons, five and six, live in a government halfway home. She is allowed to visit them on the first Saturday of every month. She eats food at the mandir, sells flowers, and pays Rs 10 to bathe in a public toilet some distance away.
But she is full of spunk and has become an outreach worker for the homeless (she’s given a supply of blankets to distribute among those who land up without one). She says she does not like living in shelters as people fight there and claim spaces. That said, she yearns for a home somewhere, anywhere.
Indeed, many families on the streets prefer the outdoors to shelters. It is only the daily-wage workers who want a covered spot after a hard day’s work. Karol Bagh is one of the industrial hubs of Delhi with small factories making jeans, garments and machine parts. Dev Nagar, near Liberty cinema, is a dwelling of the homeless workers. Many are rickshaw pullers from Bihar, UP, Madhya Pradesh, staying without their families.
There is a small tin shelter in Dev Nagar, but many are forced to sleep out in the open on the rickshaws. In the last two weeks, two plastic shelters were put up. Hemlata Kansotia, a social worker, who checks in on Dev Nagar once a day, points out how plastic is no protection against rain on winter nights. The sheets dip under the weight of water, the dhuree on rough stones is soaked. Portable toilets too have been provided but they are still to be connected to sewage lines. Since they can’t sleep on the wet floor, the inmates are told to bring their rickshaws into the shelter and sleep on them.
Near the Yamuna river, there is a row of shelters but they get packed so quick many sleep out in the open or under the flyovers. We counted 172 people under one near ISBT. Six people died in the past week at this very same spot. Many here are ragpickers, surviving on the edges.
Many of the shelters in the capital come under the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB). It has a CEO named Aman Nath, who had assured the high court on December 10 that no homeless would die in the city. After six died on one night, Indu sought criminal action against Aman Nath and sent an SMS to Kejriwal. He got a reply from the CM, which said they are looking for good officers in the bureaucracy.
Not far from the Yamuna river, there is a shelter run by Child Watch India, whose caretaker Nishu Tripathi says that Aman Nath visited and said that “people sleep out in the open only so that they can collect blankets”. He says the bureaucrats are just plain callous and don’t care if people live or die. Meanwhile, the clouds suddenly clear up. The moonlight reveals a row of bodies shivering under blankets on the banks of the Yamuna with only the sky over their heads.
By Saba Naqvi
Photographs: Narendra Bisht
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Making false promises, is wrong. But making false accusations in the media is even more so.
Just what does the media expect from Kejriwal?
To change the bureacracy, full of inefficient and corrupt officers, into acting efficiently and quickly?
181homeless have already died on Delhi roadsides due to cold waves since Kejriwal took oath of office. How selectively Saba ignores (hides) the truth. Old habits die hard. No?
How come Modi was not blamed for this?? I am surprised.
> "it is the homeless and the urban poor in the slums who face the brunt of the anarchy of constant police harassment."
This certainly may explain Kejriwal's antipathy for the police.
//Famines don’t occur in democracies, Amartya Sen observes, but eradicating preventable winter mortality seems to ask for more than political democracy.//
The First World-Problem(s)
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT