The fact is, Priyanka has it. Rahul doesn't. The most vivid demonstration of this was that famous photograph taken when India won the one-day international cricket match in Pakistan. Indians erupted in joy and the magic moment was symbolised by Priyanka with her hands thrown up into the air, an ecstatic smile stretching from ear to ear. Rahul stood alongside, face impassive, applauding politely. Priyanka was all there. Rahul was not there at all. Like many American women who have bad hair days, it could just be that it was Rahul's bad day. But so far, there is very little to suggest that Rahul has charisma.
No doubt, Rahul attracts huge crowds in the Gandhi family pocketboroughs. That has more to do with dynastic loyalties and the uncanny resemblance to his father who was loved dearly by Amethi voters. And like his Dad, Rahul seems a decent, likeable person. But charisma is something totally different. It's a strange alchemy of inner spirit, energy, fire, radiance, enthusiasm, spontaneity. It's genuine and springs from deep within. It can't be faked. It's the spark that charges you while energising others around you. Priyanka has it.
She is the Congress party's best and sole weapon to take on the BJP. Charisma is the most powerful component in politics. It breaks through all barriers, difficulties and logic. And Priyanka is the only one in the Congress party to have charisma. Besides, she belongs to India's First Family. She has an all-India appeal. She connects instinctively and instantly with voters. She rejuvenates party workers. And she is young. None of the scions of political families in the fray come anywhere close to Priyanka's charisma. She could easily capture the imagination of India's women and youth.
If only she wanted. If only her mother would let her. If only the Congress would be savvy enough. But so far, Priyanka has remained a sheathed weapon. She will hit the campaign trail soon, but at least as far as this election is concerned, it is already too little too late to bring about a dramatic shift in Congress' dwindling fortunes. She is charismatic, but after all, she is also only human.
But with potential. With India shining and all, Hindutva has given way to good governance and we are witnessing the morphing of BJP hawks into doves. Unleashing Priyanka would be like setting the cat among the pigeons. We'd see many fuddy duddys scurrying for cover, many firebrands getting hysterical again and hurling new and shop-soiled abuses once more. When threatened, the BJP tends to become more aggressive. Besides, Priyanka is a natural fighter and even if she doesn't mean to, she brings out the fighter in others. Remember how hysterical Mayawati got when Priyanka commiserated with a Dalit in her backyard!
The trouble is that when it comes to fights and accusations, Sonia Gandhi is always on the backfoot. She is defensive due to a combination of circumstances and personality. In politics, to be defensive is to lose. Attack first or be slaughtered is the credo, especially of the Right, be it in India or America. And we have seen over the last few years how brilliantly the BJP attacks and how pathetically the Congress gets slaughtered. Fair or unfair, Sonia is vulnerable to slander, jokes and criticism regarding her origins. And she is un-Indian in many ways. She is un-Indian in the way she has restrained her children from entering politics. Look at how leaders of all parties have feudalistically pushed their sons into the fray. She remains an enigma in many difficult situations unlike Mayawati, Maneka, Mamata or Jayalalithaa, all of whom have shown their penchant and flair for histrionics and street politics. Sonia is neither clever nor crafty and that is again so un-Indian. Above all, her speech is too stilted and her body language too stiff to be Indian. Unlike charisma, physical attributes are genetic. To have that inborn Indian feminine gait and grace, women in your family tree had to have carried clay pots of water on their heads for 5,000 years.
Priyanka has plenty of Indian genes—in fact, amidst the dominance of her Indira matrix, it's hard to detect her Italian genes. So the main BJP complaint against Sonia flounders against Priyanka. But the Hindutvawadis can be counted on to dredge accusations and they may even reopen her grandma's closet to dig out skeletons. But they would certainly need something more than phrases like Rome Rajya or high-tech spin-doctoring to counter her.
So far, Priyanka has chosen to remain an untested commodity in Indian politics. Her platform surfaces organically simply because she is born into the right family. Her birth has enabled her to draw aces effortlessly. But her trumpcard is her charisma. We saw from the crowd reception during the cricket match how Pakistan has already fallen under Priyanka's spell. If Pakistanis could vote in our election, Priyanka would be the next prime minister! But it's our election and it's our birthright to be difficult, demanding and dodgy. Nothing is simple or linear in our complex land. Still, there is a public craving for charisma, for political excitement, for dynastic glamour, for freshness, youth and vitality—all of which Priyanka embodies. If she, her mother and the confused Congress party play it right, Indians could easily come under her spell.
(The author can be reached at email@example.com.)
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
"Sonia...In politics, to be defensive is to lose"
Sonia has been winning in the past decade.
When compared to Rahul Priyanka is a nothing but a wife of a shady businessman. Rahul is broughtdown by priyanka and her supporters. Rahul is highly educated while priyanka is uneducated. Rahul works hard and priyanka parties hard. Rahul is sincere and hardworking while priyanka is hardly working. Rahul sacrificed his personal life for India while priyanka sacrificed India for personallife. Rahul opposes corruption while priyanka and her husband are embodiment of corruption. what else can we expect from closet modi supporters like Anita Pratap.
And she is an AAP Candidate now.. For those who argued that AAP is not a B team of CON party, do you really need more proof?
Anita Pratap writes: "Priyanka could easily capture the imagination of India's women and youth. ..."
Anita Pratap writes: "Priyanka could easily capture the imagination of India's women and youth. ..."
Its that sisterhood thinking again.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT