Vinglish film hit film. One critic said if he saw two films this year it means he watched Vinglish twice. A good critic, not easy to find. Can give life-long free passes for him and family. But I not happy, one hit film too many copycats. Everyone wants same kind of film. Sent me scripts ‘Hindi Vindi’, ‘Kannada Vannada’, ‘Telugu Velugu’, ‘Bengali Vengali’, and more. One Sridevi to make so many such films? Chaalbaaz, two Sridevis Vinglish movies? Twenty roles, ha, steal formula from Mr India, invisible and disappear. Kamalahaasan suggested new version of Chaalbaaz, he play two girls, I play Vinglish speaking cabbie. No big deal, told him off.
Many questions to answer. Vinglish permanent comeback? Daughters in films? What about Mr India II? Competition tough, RGV making same film, formula adulterated by villain (played by Amitabh) and those who touched it turned into dogs. Ugh, Amitji ignore such roles but learnt already rehearsing barks for the movie! Dog eat dog competition in Bollywood. My Mr India sequel, bad guy Mogambo conquered only by heroine who can let loose a torrent of Vinglish!
Changes in 15 years? For heroes, no acting. Only muscles and empty heads. For women, little acting, no clothes. TV same, watched dance show, Jhalak Dikhla Ja, almost nude dancing or jumping around, doing gymnastics. Gosh, old rival Madhuri a judge! What a fall! Why leave US, drag a successful handsome doctor hubby to dirty Mumbai and compete for movie roles?
Rat Race would be ideal Bollywood movie? No, no movies for daughters, whatever Boney says. Look at Esha. Star parents, yes, but made more flop movies than even Abhishek B, then got married. Good lesson. Will take daughters’ horoscopes, go to Matunga, consult leading vadhyars and settle marriages typical south Indian style. No, Boney, sorry, no Dilwale dulhaniya kind of Punju wedding for daughters.
Good news to end secret diary. Just signed Hindi-Vindi version of Chaalbaaz. Anju will speak English, Manju Vinglish. Location shooting in Stratford-upon-Avon, Lake district, Daffodil land. Made for international market, world release and so on. Also an intellectual TV serial with Aamir Khan probing our social conscience on issue of downtrodden rural masses. Phew!
The Mumbai-based satirist is the creator of ‘Trishanku’; E-mail your secret diarist: vgangadhar70 AT gmail.com
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
The only thing 'laughable' about this piece, is the amusing 'Tamlish' used by the author.
Which is a shame, since it seeks to poke fun at a certain people in general.
Other than that, will the author not get trapped in the feminist propaganda, and kindly note that the gender equivalent of a 'hero' in the other sex is 'heroine' ( and not 'hero') ?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT